Literature DB >> 28042590

Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI.

Hui Li1, William A Weiss1, Milica Medved1, Hiroyuki Abe1, Gillian M Newstead1, Gregory S Karczmar1, Maryellen L Giger1.   

Abstract

A three-dimensional breast density estimation method is presented for high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MR imaging. Twenty-two patients were recruited (under an Institutional Review Board--approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant protocol) for high-risk breast cancer screening. Each patient received standard-of-care clinical digital x-ray mammograms and MR scans, as well as HiSS scans. The algorithm for breast density estimation includes breast mask generating, breast skin removal, and breast percentage density calculation. The inter- and intra-user variabilities of the HiSS-based density estimation were determined using correlation analysis and limits of agreement. Correlation analysis was also performed between the HiSS-based density estimation and radiologists' breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) density ratings. A correlation coefficient of 0.91 ([Formula: see text]) was obtained between left and right breast density estimations. An interclass correlation coefficient of 0.99 ([Formula: see text]) indicated high reliability for the inter-user variability of the HiSS-based breast density estimations. A moderate correlation coefficient of 0.55 ([Formula: see text]) was observed between HiSS-based breast density estimations and radiologists' BI-RADS. In summary, an objective density estimation method using HiSS spectral data from breast MRI was developed. The high reproducibility with low inter- and low intra-user variabilities shown in this preliminary study suggest that such a HiSS-based density metric may be potentially beneficial in programs requiring breast density such as in breast cancer risk assessment and monitoring effects of therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SENSE acceleration; breast cancer screening and diagnosis; breast density measurement; echo planar spectroscopic imaging; high spatial and spectral resolution MRI

Year:  2016        PMID: 28042590      PMCID: PMC5193119          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.044507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  68 in total

1.  Uptake of a superparamagnetic contrast agent imaged by MR with high spectral and spatial resolution.

Authors:  G S Karczmar; X Fan; H A Al-Hallaq; M Zamora; J N River; C Rinker-Schaeffer; M Zaucha; K Tarlo; K Kellar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.

Authors:  A S Tagliafico; G Tagliafico; F Cavagnetto; M Calabrese; N Houssami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A representation for mammographic image processing.

Authors:  R Highnam; M Brady; B Shepstone
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Studying mammographic density: implications for understanding breast cancer.

Authors:  C Byrne
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.

Authors:  J Kaufhold; J A Thomas; J W Eberhard; C E Galbo; D E González Trotter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fast bilateral breast coverage with high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) MRI at 3T.

Authors:  Milica Medved; Hui Li; Hiroyuki Abe; Deepa Sheth; Gillian M Newstead; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Maryellen L Giger; Gregory S Karczmar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Whole Breast Sound Speed Measurement from US Tomography Correlates Strongly with Volumetric Breast Density from Mammography.

Authors:  Mark Sak; Peter Littrup; Rachel Brem; Neb Duric
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2020-07-17

3.  Mechanics Based Tomography: A Preliminary Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Yue Mei; Sicheng Wang; Xin Shen; Stephen Rabke; Sevan Goenezen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Using Whole Breast Ultrasound Tomography to Improve Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: A Novel Risk Factor Based on the Quantitative Tissue Property of Sound Speed.

Authors:  Neb Duric; Mark Sak; Shaoqi Fan; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Peter J Littrup; Michael S Simon; David H Gorski; Haythem Ali; Kristen S Purrington; Rachel F Brem; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.