Literature DB >> 26002523

Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

Benjamin David Godwin1, Vlad Valentin Simianu, Frederick Thurston Drake, Manjiri Dighe, David Flum, Puneet Bhargava.   

Abstract

While computed tomography (CT) remains the most accurate and widely used modality for appendicitis imaging, ultrasound has developed its own niche role, especially in the pediatric population and in premenopausal women. Ultrasound is commonly used as the initial imaging test when available, with indeterminate or clinically equivocal cases proceeding to CT.To avoid the radiation and time and cost of CT, ultrasound needs to be improved. While previous studies have focused on improving the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound through better patient selection and technique, relatively little attention has been brought to the ultrasound report, which often serves as the sole mode of communication between the radiologist and the clinician.Standardization of reporting and terminology has been found to improve patient outcomes and management in breast imaging. A standardized report for appendicitis has the potential to decrease confusion and increase accuracy. A potential format could include a standardized list of the presence or absence of imaging findings associated with appendicitis, with a final summary or score indicating the likelihood of appendicitis being present. Aggregation of data over time through use of a common format could help guide radiologist recommendations based on which imaging findings are present. Overall, a standardized report could help increase the value of ultrasound, leading to improved radiologist-clinician communication, better patient outcomes, and decreased costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26002523      PMCID: PMC4524520          DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.657


  21 in total

1.  Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; Z Protopapas; F Hooper; H Ghebrekidan; M Scanlon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; Ramon Sanchez; Maria F Ladino-Torres; Deepa R Pai; Peter J Strouse
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-09

3.  Medical imaging data reconciliation, part 4: Reconciliation of radiology reports and clinical outcomes data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Shiva A Seetahal; Oluwaseyi B Bolorunduro; Trishanna C Sookdeo; Tolulope A Oyetunji; Wendy R Greene; Wayne Frederick; Edward E Cornwell; David C Chang; Suryanarayana M Siram
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective.

Authors:  F M Grieve; A A Plumb; S H Khan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Reassessment of CT images to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and an equivocal preoperative CT interpretation.

Authors:  Hyun Cheol Kim; Dal Mo Yang; Sang Won Kim; Seong Jin Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan Krajewski; Jacqueline Brown; P Terry Phang; Manoj Raval; Carl J Brown
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Naresh Ramarajan; Nancy E Wang; Beverley Newman; Erika Rubesova; Claudia M Mueller; Richard A Barth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Suzanne Schuh; Carina Man; Adam Cheng; Amanda Murphy; Arun Mohanta; Rahim Moineddin; George Tomlinson; Jacob C Langer; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Gregory J Jurkovich; Steve Kwon; Zeila Schmidt; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rentea; Shawn D St Peter; Charles L Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Improving ultrasound for appendicitis through standardized reporting of secondary signs.

Authors:  Kristin N Partain; Adarsh U Patel; Curtis Travers; Heather L Short; Kiery Braithwaite; Jonathan Loewen; Kurt F Heiss; Mehul V Raval
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.545

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.