Literature DB >> 10541082

Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists.

B Reiner1, E Siegel, Z Protopapas, F Hooper, H Ghebrekidan, M Scanlon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine the impact of filmless operation on the relative frequency of in-person consultations in the radiology department between radiologists and clinicians.
CONCLUSION: The transition to filmless operation at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center was associated with an 82% reduction in the in-person consultation rate for general radiography and a 44% reduction for cross-sectional imaging despite an increase in the volume of studies. The major reason for this decrease was the convenient access to current and prior images provided by the PACS (picture archiving and communication system). Radiology departments contemplating a transition to filmless operation should prepare for communication with clinicians to shift from being mostly in person to being conducted more and more through electronic forms of communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541082     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  22 in total

Review 1.  Understanding financing options for PACS implementation. Picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspective.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Eliot L Siegel; Khan Siddiqui
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Establishing benchmarks for creation of a pro-forma economic model to evaluate filmless PACS operation.

Authors:  B Reiner; E Siegel; D Bradham; H Saunders; B Johnson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Demystifying occupational stress and fatigue through the creation of an adaptive end-user profiling system.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Do clinicians read our reports? Integrating the radiology information system with the electronic patient record: experiences from the first 2 years.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne Borthne; Fredrik A Dahl; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Introducing PACS to the late majority. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne Borthne; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication. Part 1: challenges and heightened expectations.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication : part 4: quality assurance and education.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication : part 2: using visual imagery for enhanced and standardized communication.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

Authors:  Benjamin David Godwin; Vlad Valentin Simianu; Frederick Thurston Drake; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.