Literature DB >> 22193372

Reassessment of CT images to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and an equivocal preoperative CT interpretation.

Hyun Cheol Kim1, Dal Mo Yang, Sang Won Kim, Seong Jin Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify CT features that discriminate individuals with and without acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings, and to assess whether knowledge of these findings improves diagnostic accuracy.
METHODS: 53 patients that underwent appendectomy with an indeterminate preoperative CT interpretation were selected and allocated to an acute appendicitis group or a non-appendicitis group. The 53 CT examinations were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus to identify CT findings that could aid in the discrimination of those with and without appendicitis. In addition, two additional radiologists were then requested to evaluate independently the 53 CT examinations using a 4-point scale, both before and after being informed of the potentially discriminating criteria.
RESULTS: CT findings found to be significantly different in the two groups were; the presence of appendiceal wall enhancement, intraluminal air in appendix, a coexistent inflammatory lesion, and appendiceal wall thickening (P < 0.05). Areas under the curves of reviewers 1 and 2 significantly increased from 0.516 and 0.706 to 0.677 and 0.841, respectively, when reviewers were told which CT variables were significant (P = 0.0193 and P = 0.0397, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of the identified CT findings was found to improve diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. KEY POINTS: • Numerous patients with clinically equivocal appendicitis do not have acute appendicitis • Computed tomography (CT) helps to reduce the negative appendectomy rate • CT is not always infallible and may also demonstrate indeterminate findings • However knowledge of significant CT variables can further reduce negative appendectomy rate • An equivocal CT interpretation of appendicitis should be reassessed with this knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22193372     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2362-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; C J McCabe; J N Lawrason; D L Berger; R Sacknoff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  CT diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Presence or absence of gas in the appendix: additional criteria to rule out or confirm acute appendicitis--evaluation with US.

Authors:  T Rettenbacher; A Hollerweger; P Macheiner; L Rettenbacher; R Frass; B Schneider; N Gritzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Thomas De Perrot; Francois Sarasin; Elisabeth Andereggen; Olivier Rutschmann; Elise Dupuis-Lozeron; Thomas Perneger; Pascal Gervaz; Christoph D Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings.

Authors:  Caroline P Daly; Richard H Cohan; Isaac R Francis; Elaine M Caoili; James H Ellis; Bin Nan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis.

Authors:  M J Weyant; S R Eachempati; M A Maluccio; D E Rivadeneira; S R Grobmyer; L J Hydo; P S Barie
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Diagnostic performance of CT in the detection of intestinal ischemia associated with small-bowel obstruction using maximal attenuation of region of interest.

Authors:  Kyung Mi Jang; Kwangseon Min; Min Jeong Kim; Sung Hye Koh; Eui Yong Jeon; In-Gyu Kim; Dongil Choi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  The equivocal appendix at CT: prevalence in a control population.

Authors:  Emily M Webb; Zhen J Wang; Fergus V Coakley; Liina Poder; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-07-14

9.  The role of computed tomography in clinically-suspected but equivocal acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A C C Poh; M Lin; H S Teh; A G S Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT.

Authors:  D Choi; H Park; Y R Lee; S-H Kook; S K Kim; H J Kwag; E C Chung
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  14 in total

1.  A novel reporting system to improve accuracy in appendicitis imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin D Godwin; Frederick T Drake; Vlad V Simianu; Jabi E Shriki; Daniel S Hippe; Manjiri Dighe; Sarah Bastawrous; Carlos Cuevas; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

Authors:  Benjamin David Godwin; Vlad Valentin Simianu; Frederick Thurston Drake; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.657

3.  Predictors of appendicitis on computed tomography among cases with borderline appendix size.

Authors:  Atalie C Thompson; Eric W Olcott; Peter D Poullos; R Brooke Jeffrey; Matthew O Thompson; Jarrett Rosenberg; Lewis K Shin
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  The Reliability of a Standardized Reporting System for the Diagnosis of Appendicitis.

Authors:  Vlad V Simianu; Anna Shamitoff; Daniel S Hippe; Benjamin D Godwin; Jabi E Shriki; Frederick T Drake; Ryan B O'Malley; Suresh Maximin; Sarah Bastawrous; Mariam Moshiri; Jean H Lee; Carlos Cuevas; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02

5.  The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT.

Authors:  Miguel Cabarrus; Yee-Li Sun; Jesse L Courtier; Joseph W Stengel; Fergus V Coakley; Emily M Webb
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-09-21

6.  Added value of ultrasound re-evaluation for patients with equivocal CT findings of acute appendicitis: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Ji Ye Sim; Hyuk Jung Kim; Jae Woo Yeon; Byoung Sun Suh; Ki Ho Kim; Young Rock Ha; So Ya Paik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic performance of CT for pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis in various clinical settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Hee Mang Yoon; Jeong-Yong Lee; Jung Heon Kim; Ah Young Jung; Jin Seong Lee; Young Ah Cho
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-07-12

Review 8.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Takafumi Machimoto; Yoshio Kadokawa; Toshiyuki Hata; Tatsuo Ito; Shigeru Kato; Daiki Yasukawa; Yuki Aisu; Yusuke Kimura; Maho Sasaki; Yuichi Takamatsu; Taku Kitano; Shigeo Hisamori; Tsunehiro Yoshimura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Acute appendicitis in overweight patients: the role of preoperative imaging.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Sauvain; Sandra Tschirky; Michael A Patak; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser; Markus K Muller
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-05-17

10.  Intra-Appendiceal Air at CT: Is It a Useful or a Confusing Sign for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis?

Authors:  Hye-Suk Hong; Hyun Suk Cho; Ji Young Woo; Yul Lee; Ik Yang; Ji-Young Hwang; Han Myun Kim; Jeong Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.