Literature DB >> 20828717

Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected appendicitis.

Suzanne Schuh1, Carina Man, Adam Cheng, Amanda Murphy, Arun Mohanta, Rahim Moineddin, George Tomlinson, Jacob C Langer, Andrea S Doria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of diagnostically inaccurate ultrasound scanning for suspected appendicitis. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective emergency department cohort study of 263 previously healthy children 4 to 17 years of age undergoing ultrasound scanning. Ultrasound scanning results were interpreted as positive, negative, or equivocal for appendicitis and classified as diagnostically accurate and inaccurate. The main outcome measure was association between inaccurate ultrasound scanning and age, sex, body mass index percentiles, pain duration, white blood cell count, Faces Pain Score-Revised, clinical probability of appendicitis, and ultrasound scanning operator.
RESULTS: Of the 263 patients, 95 ultrasound scanning examinations were read as positive, 76 as negative, and 92 were equivocal. A total of 162 (61.6%) ultrasound scanning examinations were accurate (TP86, TN76), and 101 (38.4%) ultrasound scanning examinations were inaccurate (FP88, FN13). Children with body mass index percentiles ≥ 85 and clinical probability of appendicitis ≤ 50% had 58.1% probability of inaccurate ultrasound scanning examination (odds ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-2.78). In lean children, diagnostic accuracy of the screening ultrasound scanning examination with second ultrasound scanning or clinical reassessment was 93% versus 83% in the obese children (95% confidence interval of the difference, 1-19%).
CONCLUSION: Screening ultrasound scanning for pediatric appendicitis has suboptimal accuracy, particularly in obese children with a low likelihood of appendicitis who should not routinely undergo ultrasound scanning. However, when followed by a second ultrasound scanning or a clinical reassessment, it offers high diagnostic accuracy in lean children.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20828717     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  25 in total

1.  A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; Ramon Sanchez; Maria F Ladino-Torres; Deepa R Pai; Peter J Strouse
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-09

2.  Performance of ultrasound in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Manoj K Mittal; Peter S Dayan; Charles G Macias; Richard G Bachur; Jonathan Bennett; Nanette C Dudley; Lalit Bajaj; Kelly Sinclair; Michelle D Stevenson; Anupam B Kharbanda
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

Authors:  Benjamin David Godwin; Vlad Valentin Simianu; Frederick Thurston Drake; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.657

4.  Use and accuracy of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Meera Kotagal; Morgan K Richards; David R Flum; Stephanie P Acierno; Robert L Weinsheimer; Adam B Goldin
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Quantifying Image Quality Improvement Using Elevated Acoustic Output in B-Mode Harmonic Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Gregg E Trahey; Clare M Haystead; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rentea; Shawn D St Peter; Charles L Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Pediatric appendiceal ultrasound: accuracy, determinacy and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Larry A Binkovitz; Kyle M L Unsdorfer; Prabin Thapa; Amy B Kolbe; Nathan C Hull; Shannon N Zingula; Kristen B Thomas; James L Homme
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-08-18

8.  Rate of and factors affecting sonographic visualization of the appendix in asymptomatic children.

Authors:  Joseph Junewick; Kimberly Dombrowski; Linda Woolpert; Sarah Vandop; Margaret Schreiner; Patricia Sutton; Corinne Horness; Melissa Vandermeulen
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-10-18

9.  Evaluating the Benefit of Elevated Acoustic Output in Harmonic Motion Estimation in Ultrasonic Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Mark L Palmeri; Ned C Rouze; Clare M Haystead; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Utility of CT after sonography for suspected appendicitis in children: integration of a clinical scoring system with a staged imaging protocol.

Authors:  Abhay Srinivasan; Sabah Servaes; Andrès Peña; Kassa Darge
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.