Literature DB >> 21421095

Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample.

Shiva A Seetahal1, Oluwaseyi B Bolorunduro, Trishanna C Sookdeo, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Wendy R Greene, Wayne Frederick, Edward E Cornwell, David C Chang, Suryanarayana M Siram.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy remains one of the most common emergency surgical procedures encountered throughout the United States. With improvements in diagnostic techniques, the efficiency of diagnosis has increased over the years. However, the entity of negative appendectomies still poses a dilemma because these are associated with unnecessary risks and costs to both patients and institutions. This study was conducted to show current statistics and trends in negative appendectomy rates in the United States.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the National Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2007. Adult patients (>18 y) having undergone appendectomies were identified by the appropriate International Classification of Diseases 9th revision codes. Patients with incidental appendectomy and those with appendiceal pathologies, also identified by relevant International Classification of Diseases 9th revision codes, were excluded. The remaining patients represent those who underwent an appendectomy without appendiceal disease. The patients then were stratified according to sex, women were classified further into younger (18-45 y) and older (>45 y) based on child-bearing age. The primary diagnoses subsequently were categorized by sex to identify the most common conditions mistaken for appendiceal disease in the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2007, there were 475,651 cases of appendectomy that were isolated. Of these, 56,252 were negative appendectomies (11.83%). There was a consistent decrease in the negative appendectomy rates from 14.7% in 1998 to 8.47% in 2007. Women accounted for 71.6% of cases of negative appendectomy, and men accounted for 28.4%. The mortality rate was 1.07%, men were associated with a higher rate of mortality (1.93% vs .74%; P < .001). Ovarian cyst was the most common diagnosis mistaken for appendicitis in younger women, whereas malignant disease of the ovary was the most common condition mistaken for appendiceal disease in women ages 45 and older. The most common misdiagnosis in men was diverticulitis of the colon.
CONCLUSIONS: There has been a consistent decline in the rates of negative appendectomy. This trend may be attributed to better diagnostics. Gynecologic conditions involving the ovary are the most common to be misdiagnosed as appendiceal disease in women.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21421095     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  47 in total

1.  Re: Male gender is a risk factor for recurrent appendicitis following nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Federico Coccolini; Michele Pisano; Fausto Catena; Elio Jovine; Gregorio Tugnoli; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A novel reporting system to improve accuracy in appendicitis imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin D Godwin; Frederick T Drake; Vlad V Simianu; Jabi E Shriki; Daniel S Hippe; Manjiri Dighe; Sarah Bastawrous; Carlos Cuevas; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

Authors:  Benjamin David Godwin; Vlad Valentin Simianu; Frederick Thurston Drake; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.657

4.  Can platelet indices be used as predictors of complication in subjects with appendicitis?

Authors:  Bahadır Ceylan; Turan Aslan; Ahmet Çınar; Ayşe Ruhkar Kurt; Yasemin Akkoyunlu
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Histological characterization of appendectomy specimens with intraoperative appearance of vascular injection.

Authors:  Marty Zdichavsky; Hannes Gögele; Gregor Blank; Miriam Kraulich; Tobias Meile; Maximilian von Feilitzsch; Dörte Wichmann; Alfred Königsrainer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  MRI features associated with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Marjolein M N Leeuwenburgh; Sebastiaan Jensch; Jan W C Gratama; Aart Spilt; Bart M Wiarda; H Wouter Van Es; Lodewijk P J Cobben; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Marja A Boermeester; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Pediatric appendicitis: state of the art review.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rentea; Shawn D St Peter; Charles L Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of emergency physician performed graded compression ultrasound study in acute appendicitis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marzieh Fathi; Seyyed Abbas Hasani; Mohammad Amin Zare; Marzieh Daadpey; Nader Hojati Firoozabadi; Daniyal Lotfi
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-09-14

9.  Can new inflammatory markers improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis?

Authors:  Manne Andersson; Marie Rubér; Christina Ekerfelt; Hanna Björnsson Hallgren; Gunnar Olaison; Roland E Andersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Improvement in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; David Reed Flum
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.