Rebecca Smith-Bindman1, Michelle Moghadassi1, Nicole Wilson1, Thomas R Nelson1, John M Boone1, Christopher H Cagnon1, Robert Gould1, David J Hall1, Mayil Krishnam1, Ramit Lamba1, Michael McNitt-Gray1, Anthony Seibert1, Diana L Miglioretti1. 1. From the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California-San Francisco, 350 Parnassus Ave, Suite 307C, San Francisco, CA 94143-0336 (R.S.B., M.M., N.W., R.G.); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Calif (R.S.B.); Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (T.R.N., D.J.H.); Department of Radiology (J.M.B., R.L., A.S.) and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences (D.L.M.), University of California-Davis, Davis, Calif; Department of Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (C.H.C., M.M.G.); Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, Calif (M.K.); and Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Wash (D.L.M.).
Abstract
PURPOSE: To summarize data on computed tomographic (CT) radiation doses collected from consecutive CT examinations performed at 12 facilities that can contribute to the creation of reference levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the collaborating institutions and was compliant with HIPAA. Radiation dose metrics were prospectively and electronically collected from 199 656 consecutive CT examinations in 83 181 adults and 3871 consecutive CT examinations in 2609 children at the five University of California medical centers during 2013. The median volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and effective dose, along with the interquartile range (IQR), were calculated separately for adults and children and stratified according to anatomic region. Distributions for DLP and effective dose are reported for single-phase examinations, multiphase examinations, and all examinations. RESULTS: For adults, the median CTDIvol was 50 mGy (IQR, 37-62 mGy) for the head, 12 mGy (IQR, 7-17 mGy) for the chest, and 12 mGy (IQR, 8-17 mGy) for the abdomen. The median DLPs for single-phase, multiphase, and all examinations, respectively, were as follows: head, 880 mGy · cm (IQR, 640-1120 mGy · cm), 1550 mGy · cm (IQR, 1150-2130 mGy · cm), and 960 mGy · cm (IQR, 690-1300 mGy · cm); chest, 420 mGy · cm (IQR, 260-610 mGy · cm), 880 mGy · cm (IQR, 570-1430 mGy · cm), and 550 mGy · cm (IQR 320-830 mGy · cm); and abdomen, 580 mGy · cm (IQR, 360-860 mGy · cm), 1220 mGy · cm (IQR, 850-1790 mGy · cm), and 960 mGy · cm (IQR, 600-1460 mGy · cm). Median effective doses for single-phase, multiphase, and all examinations, respectively, were as follows: head, 2 mSv (IQR, 1-3 mSv), 4 mSv (IQR, 3-8 mSv), and 2 mSv (IQR, 2-3 mSv); chest, 9 mSv (IQR, 5-13 mSv), 18 mSv (IQR, 12-29 mSv), and 11 mSv (IQR, 6-18 mSv); and abdomen, 10 mSv (IQR, 6-16 mSv), 22 mSv (IQR, 15-32 mSv), and 17 mSv (IQR, 11-26 mSv). In general, values for children were approximately 50% those for adults in the head and 25% those for adults in the chest and abdomen. CONCLUSION: These summary dose data provide a starting point for institutional evaluation of CT radiation doses.
PURPOSE: To summarize data on computed tomographic (CT) radiation doses collected from consecutive CT examinations performed at 12 facilities that can contribute to the creation of reference levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the collaborating institutions and was compliant with HIPAA. Radiation dose metrics were prospectively and electronically collected from 199 656 consecutive CT examinations in 83 181 adults and 3871 consecutive CT examinations in 2609 children at the five University of California medical centers during 2013. The median volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and effective dose, along with the interquartile range (IQR), were calculated separately for adults and children and stratified according to anatomic region. Distributions for DLP and effective dose are reported for single-phase examinations, multiphase examinations, and all examinations. RESULTS: For adults, the median CTDIvol was 50 mGy (IQR, 37-62 mGy) for the head, 12 mGy (IQR, 7-17 mGy) for the chest, and 12 mGy (IQR, 8-17 mGy) for the abdomen. The median DLPs for single-phase, multiphase, and all examinations, respectively, were as follows: head, 880 mGy · cm (IQR, 640-1120 mGy · cm), 1550 mGy · cm (IQR, 1150-2130 mGy · cm), and 960 mGy · cm (IQR, 690-1300 mGy · cm); chest, 420 mGy · cm (IQR, 260-610 mGy · cm), 880 mGy · cm (IQR, 570-1430 mGy · cm), and 550 mGy · cm (IQR 320-830 mGy · cm); and abdomen, 580 mGy · cm (IQR, 360-860 mGy · cm), 1220 mGy · cm (IQR, 850-1790 mGy · cm), and 960 mGy · cm (IQR, 600-1460 mGy · cm). Median effective doses for single-phase, multiphase, and all examinations, respectively, were as follows: head, 2 mSv (IQR, 1-3 mSv), 4 mSv (IQR, 3-8 mSv), and 2 mSv (IQR, 2-3 mSv); chest, 9 mSv (IQR, 5-13 mSv), 18 mSv (IQR, 12-29 mSv), and 11 mSv (IQR, 6-18 mSv); and abdomen, 10 mSv (IQR, 6-16 mSv), 22 mSv (IQR, 15-32 mSv), and 17 mSv (IQR, 11-26 mSv). In general, values for children were approximately 50% those for adults in the head and 25% those for adults in the chest and abdomen. CONCLUSION: These summary dose data provide a starting point for institutional evaluation of CT radiation doses.
Authors: I Pantos; S Thalassinou; S Argentos; N L Kelekis; G Panayiotakis; E P Efstathopoulos Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Eric Johnson; Choonsik Lee; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael Flynn; Robert T Greenlee; Randell L Kruger; Mark C Hornbrook; Douglas Roblin; Leif I Solberg; Nicholas Vanneman; Sheila Weinmann; Andrew E Williams Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Francis R Verdun; Daniel Gutierrez; John Paul Vader; Abbas Aroua; Leonor Trinidad Alamo-Maestre; François Bochud; François Gudinchet Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-04-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Yifei Wang; Thomas R Yellen-Nelson; Michelle Moghadassi; Nicole Wilson; Robert Gould; Anthony Seibert; John M Boone; Mayil Krishnam; Ramit Lamba; David J Hall; Diana L Miglioretti Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: David T Tzou; Samuel Zetumer; Manint Usawachintachit; Kazumi Taguchi; Seth K Bechis; Brian D Duty; Jonathan D Harper; Ryan S Hsi; Mathew Sorensen; Roger L Sur; Shalonda Reliford-Titus; Helena C Chang; Dylan Isaacson; David B Bayne; Zhen J Wang; Marshall L Stoller; Thomas Chi Journal: J Endourol Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Samuel J Weisenthal; Les Folio; William Kovacs; Ari Seff; Vana Derderian; Ronald M Summers; Jianhua Yao Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Madan M Rehani; Kai Yang; Emily R Melick; John Heil; Dušan Šalát; William F Sensakovic; Bob Liu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Madan M Rehani; Emily R Melick; Raza M Alvi; Ruhani Doda Khera; Salma Batool-Anwar; Tomas G Neilan; Michael Bettmann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.315