Walter Huda1, Dennise Magill, Wenjun He. 1. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To generate effective dose per unit dose length product (E/DLP) conversion factors incorporating ICRP Publication 103 tissue weighting factors. METHODS: Effective doses for CT examinations were obtained using the IMPACT Dosimetry Calculator using all 23 dose data sets that are offered by this spreadsheet. CT examinations were simulated for scans performed along the patient long axis for each dosimetry data set using a 4 cm beam width ranging from the upper thighs to top of the head. Five basic body regions (head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis), as well as combinations of the regions (head/neck, chest/abdomen, abdomen/ pelvis, and chest/abdomen/pelvis) and whole body CT scans were investigated. Correction factors were generated that can be applied to convert E/DLP conversion factors based on ICRP 60 data to conversion factors that are valid for ICRP 103 data (i.e., E103/E60). RESULTS: Use of ICRP 103 weighting factors increase effective doses for head scans by approximately 11%, for chest scans by approximately 20%, and decrease effective doses for pelvis scans by approximately 25%. Current E/DLP conversion factors are estimated to be 2.4 microSv/mGy cm for head CT examinations and range between 14 and 20 microSv/mGy cm for body CT examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Factors that enable patient CT doses to be adjusted to account for ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors are provided, which result in E/DLP factors that were increased in head and chest CT, reduced in pelvis CT, and showed no marked change in neck and abdomen CT.
PURPOSE: To generate effective dose per unit dose length product (E/DLP) conversion factors incorporating ICRP Publication 103 tissue weighting factors. METHODS: Effective doses for CT examinations were obtained using the IMPACT Dosimetry Calculator using all 23 dose data sets that are offered by this spreadsheet. CT examinations were simulated for scans performed along the patient long axis for each dosimetry data set using a 4 cm beam width ranging from the upper thighs to top of the head. Five basic body regions (head, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis), as well as combinations of the regions (head/neck, chest/abdomen, abdomen/ pelvis, and chest/abdomen/pelvis) and whole body CT scans were investigated. Correction factors were generated that can be applied to convert E/DLP conversion factors based on ICRP 60 data to conversion factors that are valid for ICRP 103 data (i.e., E103/E60). RESULTS: Use of ICRP 103 weighting factors increase effective doses for head scans by approximately 11%, for chest scans by approximately 20%, and decrease effective doses for pelvis scans by approximately 25%. Current E/DLP conversion factors are estimated to be 2.4 microSv/mGy cm for head CT examinations and range between 14 and 20 microSv/mGy cm for body CT examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Factors that enable patient CT doses to be adjusted to account for ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors are provided, which result in E/DLP factors that were increased in head and chest CT, reduced in pelvis CT, and showed no marked change in neck and abdomen CT.
Authors: Sue C Kaste; Samuel L Brady; Brian Yee; Valerie J McPherson; Robert A Kaufman; Catherine A Billups; Najat C Daw; Alberto S Pappo Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael Pienn; Gabor Kovacs; Maria Tscherner; Alexander Avian; Thorsten R Johnson; Peter Kullnig; Rudolf Stollberger; Andrea Olschewski; Horst Olschewski; Zoltán Bálint Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Michelle Moghadassi; Nicole Wilson; Thomas R Nelson; John M Boone; Christopher H Cagnon; Robert Gould; David J Hall; Mayil Krishnam; Ramit Lamba; Michael McNitt-Gray; Anthony Seibert; Diana L Miglioretti Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter K T Hui; Hyun Woo Goo; Jing Du; Janice J K Ip; Suzu Kanzaki; Young Jin Kim; Supika Kritsaneepaiboon; Oktavia Lilyasari; Suvipaporn Siripornpitak Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2017-04-24