| Literature DB >> 25984738 |
Pedro T Pisa1, Titilola M Pedro2, Kathleen Kahn3,4,5, Stephen M Tollman6,7,8, John M Pettifor9, Shane A Norris10.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify and describe the diversity of nutrient patterns and how they associate with socio-demographic and lifestyle factors including body mass index in rural black South African adolescents. Nutrient patterns were identified from quantified food frequency questionnaires (QFFQ) in 388 rural South African adolescents between the ages of 11-15 years from the Agincourt Health and Socio-demographic Surveillance System (AHDSS). Principle Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to 25 nutrients derived from QFFQs. Multiple linear regression and partial R2 models were fitted and computed respectively for each of the retained principal component (PC) scores on socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics including body mass index (BMI) for age Z scores. Four nutrient patterns explaining 79% of the total variance were identified: PCI (26%) was characterized by animal derived nutrients; PC2 (21%) by vitamins, fibre and vegetable oil nutrients; PC3 (19%) by both animal and plant derived nutrients (mixed diet driven nutrients); and PC4 (13%) by starch and folate. A positive and significant association was observed with BMI for age Z scores per 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in PC1 (0.13 (0.02; 0.24); p = 0.02) and PC4 (0.10 (-0.01; 0.21); p = 0.05) scores only. We confirmed variability in nutrient patterns that were significantly associated with various lifestyle factors including obesity.Entities:
Keywords: Agincourt health and demographic surveillance system; South Africa; adolescents; nutrient patterns; rural; transition
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25984738 PMCID: PMC4446762 DOI: 10.3390/nu7053464
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Scree plot of Eigen values after Principal Components Analysis.
Figure 2Plotted loadings (all > 0.4) for principal components(1–4).
Principal Components (PC) loading matrix and explained variances for the first four nutrient patterns identified by PCA in rural black South African adolescents: Agincourt.
| Nutrients | PC1 (Animal Driven Nutrients) | PC2 (Vitamins, Fibre and Vegetable Oil Nutrients) | PC3 (Mixed Diet Driven Nutrients) | PC4 (Starch and Folate Driven) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Animal Protein | 0.599 | −0.032 | 0.565 | −0.019 |
| Plant protein | 0.127 | 0.255 | 0.744 | 0.249 |
| SFA | 0.404 | 0.205 | 0.716 | 0.179 |
| MUFA | 0.356 | 0.326 | 0.682 | 0.191 |
| PUFA | 0.298 | 0.425 | 0.573 | 0.25 |
| Cholesterol | 0.839 | −0.005 | 0.371 | 0.115 |
| Starch | 0.207 | 0.235 | 0.165 | 0.923 |
| Sugars | 0.12 | 0.531 | 0.276 | 0.364 |
| Dietary fibre | 0.115 | 0.406 | 0.705 | 0.152 |
| Thiamine | 0.184 | 0.053 | 0.727 | 0.002 |
| Riboflavin | 0.459 | 0.105 | 0.636 | 0.058 |
| Vitamin B6 | 0.344 | 0.261 | 0.768 | 0.174 |
| Folate | 0.316 | 0.329 | 0.558 | 0.471 |
| Vitamin B12 | 0.528 | 0.059 | 0.27 | 0.089 |
| Vitamin C | 0.04 | 0.638 | 0.402 | 0.089 |
| Beta-carotene | 0.083 | 0.944 | 0.136 | 0.081 |
| Retinol | 0.919 | 0.211 | -0.007 | 0.157 |
| Vitamin E | 0.243 | 0.444 | 0.381 | 0.277 |
| Vitamin D | 0.537 | 0.205 | 0.359 | 0.148 |
| Calcium | 0.307 | 0.33 | 0.699 | 0.118 |
| Phosphorus | 0.349 | 0.163 | 0.851 | 0.092 |
| Iron | 0.31 | 0.253 | 0.782 | 0.116 |
| Potassium | 0.239 | 0.323 | 0.837 | 0.172 |
| Magnesium | 0.128 | 0.308 | 0.797 | 0.043 |
| Zinc | 0.403 | 0.172 | 0.79 | 0.129 |
| Explained variance (%) | 26 | 21 | 19 | 13 |
| Cumulative explained variance (%) | 26 | 47 | 66 | 79 |
Multiple regression derived coefficients (β) and standard errors (SE) of specified predictors for the four nutrient pattern scores.
| Variables | PC1 (Animal Driven Nutrients) | PC2 (Vitamins, Fibre and Vegetable Oil Nutrients) | PC3 (Mixed Diet Driven Nutrients) | PC4 (Starch and Folate Driven) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | SE | β | SE | β | SE | β | SE | |||||
| Age (years) of adolescent | −0.027 | 0.036 | 0.46 | −0.046 | 0.036 | 0.21 | 0.033 | 0.022 | 0.14 | 0.007 | 0.037 | 0.84 |
| BMI | 0.024 | 0.016 | 0.15 | −0.009 | 0.016 | 0.58 | −0.005 | 0.1 | 0.64 | 0.001 | 0.017 | 0.98 |
| Log (Energy) | 0.607 | 0.132 | <0.0001 | 0.601 | 0.132 | <0.0001 | 2.127 | 0.08 | <0.0001 | 0.665 | 0.135 | <0.0001 |
| Sex | ||||||||||||
| Female | 0.235 | 0.11 | 0.03 | −0.052 | 0.11 | 0.64 | −0.046 | 0.067 | 0.5 | 0.147 | 0.112 | 0.19 |
| Male (Ref) | ||||||||||||
| Maternal Education level | ||||||||||||
| Primary school | −0.041 | 0.13 | 0.75 | 0.09 | 0.131 | 0.49 | −0.07 | 0.079 | 0.38 | −0.16 | 0.133 | 0.24 |
| Secondary and higher education | −0.147 | 0.138 | 0.29 | 0.171 | 0.138 | 0.22 | −0.109 | 0.084 | 0.2 | −0.57 | 0.141 | 0.69 |
| None (Ref) | ||||||||||||
| Physical activity of adolescent | ||||||||||||
| Walking to and from school (min week−1) | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.62 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.74 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.01 | −0.001 | 0.001 | 0.05 |
| Tanner stage | ||||||||||||
| Mid | −0.067 | 0.151 | 0.66 | 0.343 | 0.151 | 0.02 | −0.045 | 0.092 | 0.62 | 0.014 | 0.154 | 0.93 |
| Early (Ref) | ||||||||||||
| Marital Status of mother | ||||||||||||
| Never in union | 0.231 | 0.121 | 0.05 | 0.196 | 0.121 | 0.11 | −0.108 | 0.703 | 0.14 | 0.106 | 0.124 | 0.4 |
| Ever in union ended | 0.017 | 0.183 | 0.93 | 0.104 | 0.183 | 0.57 | 0.051 | 0.11 | 0.65 | 0.001 | 0.187 | 0.99 |
| Ever in union current (Ref) | ||||||||||||
| Maternal age (years) | ||||||||||||
| 15–24 | 0.289 | 0.975 | 0.77 | 0.966 | 0.978 | 0.32 | −0.257 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.406 | 0.996 | 0.68 |
| 25–34 (Ref) | ||||||||||||
| 35–49 | 0.264 | 0.115 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.115 | 0.95 | −0.09 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 0.048 | 0.117 | 0.68 |
| >50 | −0.251 | 0.178 | 0.161 | 0.188 | 0.179 | 0.29 | 0.117 | 0.108 | 0.28 | 0.076 | 0.182 | 0.68 |
| SES status of mother (based on SES Wealth Index) | ||||||||||||
| lowest tertile | −0.336 | 0.134 | 0.01 | −0.098 | 0.134 | 0.46 | 0.166 | 0.081 | 0.04 | −0.06 | 0.136 | 0.67 |
| middle tertile | −0.11 | 0.132 | 0.4 | −0.207 | 0.133 | 0.12 | 0.071 | 0.08 | 0.39 | −0.07 | 0.135 | 0.62 |
| highest tertile (Ref) | ||||||||||||
PC scores had means of 0 but standardized to unit variance; PC scores calculated from QFF derived intake of 25 nutrients, n = 388; SES, socio-economic status socio-economic status; BMI, body mass index; Ref, reference group in the regression after creating dummy variables (categorical coding in regression analysis).
p-Values of F-test on type III sum of squares estimate.
| Variable | DF# | PC1 (Animal Driven Nutrients) | PC2 (Vitamins, Fibre and Vegetable Oil Nutrients) | PC3 (Mixed Diet Driven Nutrients) | PC4 (Starch and Folate Driven) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partial | % | Partial | % | Partial | % | Partial | % | ||||||
| Age | 1 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.57 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.48 | 0.009 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.51 |
| BMI | 1 | 0.013 | 1.3 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.64 | 0.003 | 0.3 | 0.28 | 0.006 | 0.6 | 0.12 |
| Log(Energy) | 1 | 0.065 | 6.5 | <0.0001 | 0.06 | 6 | <0.0001 | 0.666 | 66.6 | <0.0001 | 0.067 | 6.7 | <0.0001 |
| Sex | 1 | 0.026 | 2.6 | <0.0001 | 0 | 0 | 0.85 | 0.005 | 0.5 | 0.17 | 0.004 | 0.4 | 0.23 |
| Maternal education | 2 | 0.059 | 5.9 | <0.0001 | 0.006 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.002 | 0.2 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 | 0.84 |
| Physical activity (Walking to and from school (min week−1) | 1 | 0.005 | 0.5 | 0.17 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.013 | 1.3 | 0.02 |
| Tanner Stage | 1 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.65 | 0.011 | 1.1 | 0.04 | 0.002 | 0.2 | 0.33 | 0.002 | 0.2 | 0.41 |
| Marital status of mother | 2 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.51 | 0.008 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.57 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.61 |
| Maternal age | 3 | 0.002 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.55 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.59 | 0.001 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| SES status of mother (based on SES Wealth Index) | 2 | 0.013 | 1.3 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 1 | 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 0.84 | 0.005 | 0.5 | 0.23 |
PC scores had means of 0 but standardized to unit variance; PC scores calculated from QFF derived intake of 25 nutrients, n = 388, # degrees of freedom; socio-economic status socio-economic status.
Regression coefficients for BMI for Age Z scores for 1 SD increase in PC 1 (Animal driven nutrients) and PC4 (Starch and folate driven) scores in rural black South African adolescents.
| Nutrient pattern | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (95% CI) | B (95% CI) | B (95% CI) | B (95% CI) | |||||
| 0.129 (0.018–0.239) | 0.02 | 0.137 (0.025; 0.248) | 0.02 | 0.118 (0.005; 0.230) | 0.04 | 0.120 (−0.005; 0.245) | 0.06 | |
| Physical activity | 2.191×10−5 (−0.001; 0.001) | 0.95 | 0.0 (−0.001; 0.001) | 0.78 | 6.67×10−5 (−0.001; 0.001) | 0.87 | ||
| low tertile | −0.331 (−0.601; −0.060) | 0.02 | −0.346 (−0.672; −0.020) | 0.04 | ||||
| middle tertile | 0.009 (−0.262; 0.280) | 0.95 | 0.144 (−0.172; 0.46) | 0.37 | ||||
| highest tertile (ref) | ||||||||
| Total number of years of schooling | 0.026 (0.0; 0.053) | 0.05 | ||||||
| 0.103 (−0.008; 0.213) | 0.05 | 0.092 (−0.022; 0.206) | 0.12 | 0.087 (−0.026; 0.201) | 0.13 | 0.011 (−0.117;0.138) | 0.87 | |
| Physical activity | 2.74× 10−5 (−0.001; 0.001) | 0.94 | 0.0 (−0.001; 0.001) | 0.75 | 7.59×10−6 (−0.001; 0.001) | 0.99 | ||
| low tertile | −0.361 (−0.629; −0.092) | 0.01 | −0.407 (−0.729; −0.085) | 0.01 | ||||
| middle tertile | 0.002 (−0.269; 0.273) | 0.98 | 0.103 (−0.212; 0.418) | 0.52 | ||||
| highest tertile (ref) | ||||||||
| Total number of years of schooling | 0.028 (0.002; 0.05) | 0.04 | ||||||
M1: (crude); M2: (adjusted for physical activity); M3: (adjusted for M2 plus socio-economic status of mother); M4: (adjusted for M3 plus educational level of mother); M1, model 1; M2, model 2; M3, model 3; M4 model 4. Ref, reference group in the regression after creating dummy variables (categorical coding in regression analysis).