| Literature DB >> 22933647 |
Kathleen Kahn1, Mark A Collinson, F Xavier Gómez-Olivé, Obed Mokoena, Rhian Twine, Paul Mee, Sulaimon A Afolabi, Benjamin D Clark, Chodziwadziwa W Kabudula, Audrey Khosa, Simon Khoza, Mildred G Shabangu, Bernard Silaule, Jeffrey B Tibane, Ryan G Wagner, Michel L Garenne, Samuel J Clark, Stephen M Tollman.
Abstract
The Agincourt health and socio-demographic surveillance system (HDSS), located in rural northeast South Africa close to the Mozambique border, was established in 1992 to support district health systems development led by the post-apartheid ministry of health. The HDSS (90 000 people), based on an annual update of resident status and vital events, now supports multiple investigations into the causes and consequences of complex health, population and social transitions. Observational work includes cohorts focusing on different stages along the life course, evaluation of national policy at population, household and individual levels and examination of household responses to shocks and stresses and the resulting pathways influencing health and well-being. Trials target children and adolescents, including promoting psycho-social well-being, preventing HIV transmission and reducing metabolic disease risk. Efforts to enhance the research platform include using automated measurement techniques to estimate cause of death by verbal autopsy, full 'reconciliation' of in- and out-migrations, follow-up of migrants departing the study area, recording of extra-household social connections and linkage of individual HDSS records with those from sub-district clinics. Fostering effective collaborations (including INDEPTH multi-centre work in adult health and ageing and migration and urbanization), ensuring cross-site compatibility of common variables and optimizing public access to HDSS data are priorities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22933647 PMCID: PMC3429877 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Epidemiol ISSN: 0300-5771 Impact factor: 7.196
Figure 1Research themes supported by the Agincourt HDSS, South Africa
Features of cohorts nested within the Agincourt HDSS
| Cohort description | Sample | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort name | Aim | Size | Type | Assessments to date Frequency of follow-up | Inclusion criteria | Sampling unit | |
| To measure metabolic disease risk in adolescent girls | 600 | Closed | Cohort recruited in 2007 Follow-up 2009 and 2012 | Boys and girls aged 7/8, 11/12 and 14/15 years | Individual | ||
| To measure HIV and non-communicable disease prevalence and their risk factors | 7428 | Closed | Baseline in 2010/2011 Repeat planned for 2013 | Men and women 15 years and older Permanent residents | Individual | ||
| To assess health status, well-being and health seeking behaviour of older persons | 4509 | Open | Baseline in 2006 Follow-up in 2010 Repeat planned in 2013 | Population 50 years and older Permanent residents | Individual | ||
| To understand the burden of epilepsy, pattern of seizures, and excess mortality in persons with epilepsy | 310 | Closed | Nine rounds completed Follow-up every 3 months | All ages diagnosed with epilepsy following screening in 2008 | Individual | ||
| To examine (i) household income, resource use, response to shocks on household livelihoods, (ii) how livelihood capital migration and use of natural resources shape household resilience and (iii) how poverty influences child nutrition | 590 individuals and their households | Closed | Round 1—2010 Round 2—2011 Round 3—2012 | Sample stratified by gender and age Four individuals selected per age/gender group in nine villages | Individual (households interviewed) | ||
| Cluster randomized trial to test school-based interventions to promote social and emotional wellbeing of children 10–12 years | 988 individuals in 10 schools | Closed | Cohort recruited in 2009 Post-intervention follow-up end-2010 Next follow-up in 2013 | Boys and girls in grades 5 and 6 | Schools | ||
| Randomized trial to determine whether young women who receive cash transfers conditional on school attendance have a lower incidence of HIV and HSV2 infection over time | 2900 | Closed | Cohort recruited in 2011/2012 Annual follow-up for 3 years | Young women aged 13–20 years, in school grades 8–11, one girl per household | Individual | ||
Figure 2(a) Location of Agincourt HDSS and sub-district within South Africa, near the Mozambique border. (b) Boundary of the Agincourt HDSS study site adjacent to the Kruger National Park, South Africa. (c) Agincourt HDSS study site and sub-district indicating positions of villages and health and education facilities
Features of the Agincourt HDSS population, South Africa
| Feature at 1 July 2011 | No. or % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | ||||
| de facto population (permanent residents) | 66 876 | |||
| de jure population (permanent residents + temporary migrants resident <6 months/year) | 90 036 | |||
| Sex ratio (male:female) | ||||
| de facto population | 0.77 | |||
| de jure population | 0.92 | |||
| At birth | 1.01 | |||
| Percentage under 5 years | ||||
| de facto population | 13.74 | |||
| de jure population | 11.81 | |||
| Percentage under 15 years | ||||
| de facto population | 40.49 | |||
| de jure population | 33.59 | |||
| Percentage 65 years and over | ||||
| de facto population | 5.95 | |||
| de jure population | 4.65 | |||
| Mean household size (based on de jure population) | ||||
| Total households | 16 121 | |||
| Mean no. of members | 5.58 | |||
| Percentage temporary migrants (no. of temporary migrants/de jure
population) | ||||
| Male | 32.67 | |||
| Female | 19.31 |
aThis reflects disproportionately high male labour migration.
bMostly labour migrants working in towns and cities, in the mining sector or on large agricultural estates.
Variables collected during annual resident status and vital events update, Agincourt HDSS
| Main data item | Specific information |
|---|---|
| Village number; dwelling number | |
| Name, surname and gender | Recorded for each individual |
| Date of birth | Noted if estimate |
| Mother’s identification and location | Vital status and where she lives |
| Father’s identification and location | Vital status and where he lives |
| Relationship of individual to household head | |
| Nationality/refugee status | If Mozambican, when arrived in sub-district |
| Months resident in last year | Number of months resided in rural household |
| Residence status | Migrant (<6 months in area over past year) |
| Permanent (>6 months in area over past year) | |
| Visitor (not member of household) | |
| Education status | Highest level completed |
| Pregnancy status | Currently pregnant or not; expected delivery month |
| Type of grant | Non-contributory social grants received (includes old age, child support) |
| National ID number | |
| Antenatal clinic attendance | Number of visits |
| Contraceptive use before/after pregnancy | |
| Delivery | Date, location, name hospital, birth attendant and complications |
| Outcome | Live birth, stillbirth, abortion and multiple births |
| Duration pregnancy | |
| Infant | Gender, birthweight, breastfeeding and birth registration |
| Date of death | Noted if estimate |
| Location of death | Home, clinic, health centre, hospital (+name) and accident site |
| Maternal death | Death during pregnancy or delivery or within 42 days |
| Death registration | |
| Details of in- or out-migrants | Name, national ID |
| Move date | Noted if estimate |
| Place migrated from and to | |
| Main reason for migration | |
| Sector of work for job-related moves | |
| Full childbirth history of all women | Information on each child not listed in household roster |
| Record of all marriages/unions | Partners’ details, union start/end dates, civil registration, traditional/civil ceremony, reason for union ending |
Add-on modules and status observations included in update rounds, Agincourt HDSS, 1992–2012
Figure 3Population pyramids of the Agincourt HDSS population: 1994, 2006 and 2011. (a) de jure population, 1 July 1994; population = 66 405. (b) de jure population, 1 July 2006; population = 72 715. (c) de jure population, 1 July 2011; population = 90 036
Indicators of cardiometabolic risk across the life course 2002–07, Agincourt sub-district, South Africa
All figures given as % except for body mass index.
aAt 1 year.
bAt 2 years.
c14–15 years.
d18–20 years.
eAssessed at Tanner Stage 5: pubertal self-rating scale defined by male genital development and female breast development.
fAbdominal obesity: waist circumference >102 cm in males and >88 cm in females (adults), and ≥94 cm in males and ≥80 cm in females (adolescents).
gABI ≤ 0.9 is associated with other cardiovascular disease indicators such as angina pectoris and carotid stenosis.