OBJECTIVES: To explore the role of nutrient patterns in the etiology of breast cancer (BC) among Uruguayan women. METHODS: A principal component analysis was conducted. The study included 442 newly diagnosed cases of BC and 442 hospitalized controls. RESULTS: Two dietary patterns derived from factor analysis and were labeled as high-meat and antioxidants patterns. Whereas the high-meat pattern was directly associated with BC risk (OR for the highest versus the lowest quartile = 3.50, 95 % CI 1.94-6.30, p-value for trend <0.0001), the antioxidants pattern displayed a protective effect (OR=0.44, 95 % CI 0.27-0.74). Its negative association was stronger for postmenopausal than for premenopausal women (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.79 vs. OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.50-1.56, respectively). Both strata were heterogeneous (p=0.004). The high-meat pattern was more associated with BC risk among patients with family history of BC compared with participants without it, but results did not differ by histology. In contrast, the antioxidants pattern was more associated with non-ductal cancers (OR=0.50 [95 % CI 0.35-0.69]) than with ductal cancers (OR=0.72, 95 % CI 0.58-0.88, heterogeneity p-value=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results support an association between the high-meat and antioxidant dietary patterns and BC risk. Furthermore, findings suggest that gene-environmental interactions may be important in BC etiology.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the role of nutrient patterns in the etiology of breast cancer (BC) among Uruguayan women. METHODS: A principal component analysis was conducted. The study included 442 newly diagnosed cases of BC and 442 hospitalized controls. RESULTS: Two dietary patterns derived from factor analysis and were labeled as high-meat and antioxidants patterns. Whereas the high-meat pattern was directly associated with BC risk (OR for the highest versus the lowest quartile = 3.50, 95 % CI 1.94-6.30, p-value for trend <0.0001), the antioxidants pattern displayed a protective effect (OR=0.44, 95 % CI 0.27-0.74). Its negative association was stronger for postmenopausal than for premenopausal women (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.79 vs. OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.50-1.56, respectively). Both strata were heterogeneous (p=0.004). The high-meat pattern was more associated with BC risk among patients with family history of BC compared with participants without it, but results did not differ by histology. In contrast, the antioxidants pattern was more associated with non-ductal cancers (OR=0.50 [95 % CI 0.35-0.69]) than with ductal cancers (OR=0.72, 95 % CI 0.58-0.88, heterogeneity p-value=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Results support an association between the high-meat and antioxidant dietary patterns and BC risk. Furthermore, findings suggest that gene-environmental interactions may be important in BC etiology.
Authors: Natalia Tumas; Camila Niclis; Laura R Aballay; Alberto R Osella; María del Pilar Díaz Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Christiana A Demetriou; Andreas Hadjisavvas; Maria A Loizidou; Giorgos Loucaides; Ioanna Neophytou; Sabina Sieri; Eleni Kakouri; Nicos Middleton; Paolo Vineis; Kyriacos Kyriacou Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Pedro T Pisa; Titilola M Pedro; Kathleen Kahn; Stephen M Tollman; John M Pettifor; Shane A Norris Journal: Nutrients Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Aurelie Moskal; Pedro T Pisa; Pietro Ferrari; Graham Byrnes; Heinz Freisling; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Claire Cadeau; Laura Nailler; Andrea Wendt; Tilman Kühn; Heiner Boeing; Brian Buijsse; Anne Tjønneland; Jytte Halkjær; Christina C Dahm; Stephanie E Chiuve; Jose R Quirós; Genevieve Buckland; Esther Molina-Montes; Pilar Amiano; José M Huerta Castaño; Aurelio Barricarte Gurrea; Kay-Tee Khaw; Marleen A Lentjes; Timothy J Key; Dora Romaguera; Anne-Claire Vergnaud; Antonia Trichopoulou; Christina Bamia; Philippos Orfanos; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; Maria Santucci de Magistris; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Marga C Ocké; Joline W J Beulens; Ulrika Ericson; Isabel Drake; Lena M Nilsson; Anna Winkvist; Elisabete Weiderpass; Anette Hjartåker; Elio Riboli; Nadia Slimani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carolina Bonilla; Bernardo Bertoni; Pedro C Hidalgo; Nora Artagaveytia; Elizabeth Ackermann; Isabel Barreto; Paula Cancela; Mónica Cappetta; Ana Egaña; Gonzalo Figueiro; Silvina Heinzen; Stanley Hooker; Estela Román; Mónica Sans; Rick A Kittles Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Yunjun Xiao; Junjie Xia; Liping Li; Yuebin Ke; Jinquan Cheng; Yaojie Xie; Winnie Chu; Polly Cheung; Jean Hee Kim; Graham A Colditz; Rulla M Tamimi; Xuefen Su Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 6.466