Literature DB >> 25981785

Bi-component T2 * analysis of bound and pore bone water fractions fails at high field strengths.

Alan C Seifert1, Suzanne L Wehrli2, Felix W Wehrli1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis involves the degradation of the bone's trabecular architecture, cortical thinning and enlargement of cortical pores. Increased cortical porosity is a major cause of the decreased strength of osteoporotic bone. The majority of cortical pores, however, are below the resolution limit of MRI. Recent work has shown that porosity can be evaluated by MRI-based quantification of bone water. Bi-exponential T2 * fitting and adiabatic inversion preparation are the two most common methods purported to distinguish bound and pore water in order to quantify matrix density and porosity. To assess the viability of T2 * bi-component analysis as a method for the quantification of bound and pore water fractions, we applied this method to human cortical bone at 1.5, 3, 7 and 9.4 T, and validated the resulting pool fractions against micro-computed tomography-derived porosity and gravimetrically determined bone densities. We also investigated alternative methods: two-dimensional T1 -T2 * bi-component fitting by incorporation of saturation recovery, one- and two-dimensional fitting of Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) echo amplitudes, and deuterium inversion recovery. The short-T2 * pool fraction was moderately correlated with porosity (R(2)  = 0.70) and matrix density (R(2)  = 0.63) at 1.5 T, but the strengths of these associations were found to diminish rapidly as the field strength increased, falling below R(2)  = 0.5 at 3 T. The addition of the T1 dimension to bi-component analysis only slightly improved the strengths of these correlations. T2 *-based bi-component analysis should therefore be used with caution. The performance of deuterium inversion recovery at 9.4 T was also poor (R(2)  = 0.50 vs porosity and R(2)  = 0.46 vs matrix density). The CPMG-derived short-T2 fraction at 9.4 T, however, was highly correlated with porosity (R(2)  = 0.87) and matrix density (R(2)  = 0.88), confirming the utility of this method for independent validation of bone water pools.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; NMR; bi-component analysis; bone; bone water; bound water; pore water; relaxation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25981785      PMCID: PMC4478152          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  38 in total

Review 1.  Bone poroelasticity.

Authors:  S C Cowin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Comparison of optimized soft-tissue suppression schemes for ultrashort echo time MRI.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Jeremy F Magland; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging of cortical bone.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Michael Carl; Mark Bydder; Atsushi Takahashi; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone.

Authors:  J A Hopkins; F W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessed cortical porosity is highly correlated with μCT porosity.

Authors:  Won C Bae; Shantanu Patil; Reni Biswas; Shihong Li; Eric Y Chang; Sheronda Statum; Darryl D D'Lima; Christine B Chung; Jiang Du
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Clinically compatible MRI strategies for discriminating bound and pore water in cortical bone.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Daniel F Gochberg; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Multiple quantum filtered NMR studies of the interaction between collagen and water in the tendon.

Authors:  Uzi Eliav; Gil Navon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-03-27       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Adam Horch; Jeffry S Nyman; Daniel F Gochberg; Richard D Dortch; Mark D Does
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Water content measured by proton-deuteron exchange NMR predicts bone mineral density and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Maria A Fernández-Seara; Suzanne L Wehrli; Masaya Takahashi; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Risedronate reduces intracortical porosity in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Babul Borah; Tom Dufresne; Joe Nurre; Roger Phipps; Paula Chmielewski; Leigh Wagner; Mark Lundy; Mary Bouxsein; Roger Zebaze; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  19 in total

1.  Magnetization transfer imaging of cortical bone in vivo using a zero echo time sequence in mice at 4.7 T: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Magda Marcon; Markus Weiger; Daniel Keller; Moritz C Wurnig; Christian Eberhardt; Daniel Eberli; Andreas Boss
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Fast volumetric imaging of bound and pore water in cortical bone using three-dimensional ultrashort-TE (UTE) and inversion recovery UTE sequences.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Michael Carl; Yajun Ma; Hongda Shao; Xing Lu; Bimin Chen; Eric Y Chang; Zhihong Wu; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It?

Authors:  D M L Cooper; C E Kawalilak; K Harrison; B D Johnston; J D Johnston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging with tricomponent analysis for human cortical bone.

Authors:  Xing Lu; Saeed Jerban; Lidi Wan; Yajun Ma; Hyungseok Jang; Nicole Le; Wenhui Yang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.

Authors:  Mary Kate Manhard; Jeffry S Nyman; Mark D Does
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.012

6.  Trabecular bone imaging using a 3D adiabatic inversion recovery prepared ultrashort TE Cones sequence at 3T.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Yanjun Chen; Liang Li; Zhenyu Cai; Zhao Wei; Saeed Jerban; Hyungseok Jang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Fat suppression for ultrashort echo time imaging using a novel soft-hard composite radiofrequency pulse.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Saeed Jerban; Hyungseok Jang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Can ultrashort-TE (UTE) MRI sequences on a 3-T clinical scanner detect signal directly from collagen protons: freeze-dry and D2 O exchange studies of cortical bone and Achilles tendon specimens.

Authors:  Ya-Jun Ma; Eric Y Chang; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Measurement of bound and pore water T1 relaxation times in cortical bone using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones sequences.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Eric Y Chang; Michael Carl; Yajun Ma; Hongda Shao; Bimin Chen; Zhihong Wu; Jiang Du
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Evaluation of bound and pore water in cortical bone using ultrashort-TE MRI.

Authors:  Jun Chen; Shawn P Grogan; Hongda Shao; Darryl D'Lima; Graeme M Bydder; Zhihong Wu; Jiang Du
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.