Ya-Jun Ma1, Saeed Jerban1, Hyungseok Jang1, Eric Y Chang1,2, Jiang Du1. 1. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California. 2. Radiology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To design a soft-hard composite pulse for fat suppression and water excitation in ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging with minimal short T2 signal attenuation. METHODS: The composite pulse contains a narrow bandwidth soft pulse centered on the fat peak with a small negative flip angle (-α) and a short rectangular pulse with a small positive flip angle (α). The fat magnetization experiences both tipping-down and -back with an identical flip angle and thus returns to the equilibrium state, leaving only the excited water magnetization. Bloch simulations, as well as knee, tibia, and ankle UTE imaging studies, were performed to investigate the effectiveness of fat suppression and corresponding water signal attenuation. A conventional fat saturation (FatSat) module was used for comparison. Signal suppression ratio (SSR), defined as the ratio of signal difference between non-fat-suppression and fat-suppression images over the non-fat-suppression signal, was introduced to evaluate the efficiency of the composite pulse. RESULTS: Numerical simulations demonstrate that the soft-hard pulse has little saturation effect on short T2 water signals. Knee, tibia, and ankle UTE imaging results suggest that comparable fat suppression can be achieved with the soft-hard pulse and the FatSat module. However, much less water saturation is induced by the soft-hard pulse, especially for short T2 tissues, with SSRs reduced from 71.8 ± 6.9% to 5.8 ± 4.4% for meniscus, from 68.7 ± 5.5% to 7.7 ± 7.6% for bone, and from 62.9 ± 12.0% to 4.8 ± 3.2% for the Achilles tendon. CONCLUSION: The soft-hard composite pulse can suppress fat signals in UTE imaging with little signal attenuation on short T2 tissues.
PURPOSE: To design a soft-hard composite pulse for fat suppression and water excitation in ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging with minimal short T2 signal attenuation. METHODS: The composite pulse contains a narrow bandwidth soft pulse centered on the fat peak with a small negative flip angle (-α) and a short rectangular pulse with a small positive flip angle (α). The fat magnetization experiences both tipping-down and -back with an identical flip angle and thus returns to the equilibrium state, leaving only the excited water magnetization. Bloch simulations, as well as knee, tibia, and ankle UTE imaging studies, were performed to investigate the effectiveness of fat suppression and corresponding water signal attenuation. A conventional fat saturation (FatSat) module was used for comparison. Signal suppression ratio (SSR), defined as the ratio of signal difference between non-fat-suppression and fat-suppression images over the non-fat-suppression signal, was introduced to evaluate the efficiency of the composite pulse. RESULTS: Numerical simulations demonstrate that the soft-hard pulse has little saturation effect on short T2 water signals. Knee, tibia, and ankle UTE imaging results suggest that comparable fat suppression can be achieved with the soft-hard pulse and the FatSat module. However, much less water saturation is induced by the soft-hard pulse, especially for short T2 tissues, with SSRs reduced from 71.8 ± 6.9% to 5.8 ± 4.4% for meniscus, from 68.7 ± 5.5% to 7.7 ± 7.6% for bone, and from 62.9 ± 12.0% to 4.8 ± 3.2% for the Achilles tendon. CONCLUSION: The soft-hard composite pulse can suppress fat signals in UTE imaging with little signal attenuation on short T2 tissues.
Authors: Ya-Jun Ma; Xing Lu; Michael Carl; Yanchun Zhu; Nikolaus M Szeverenyi; Graeme M Bydder; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Shihong Li; Lanqing Ma; Eric Y Chang; Hongda Shao; Jun Chen; Christine B Chung; Graeme M Bydder; Jiang Du Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ya-Jun Ma; Wei Zhao; Lidi Wan; Tan Guo; Adam Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Amin Nazaran; Erik W Dorthe; Esther Cory; Michael Carl; Darryl D'Lima; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Lidi Wan; Adam C Searleman; Hyungseok Jang; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Ya-Jun Ma; Shujuan Fan; Hongda Shao; Jiang Du; Nikolaus M Szeverenyi; Ian R Young; Graeme M Bydder Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2020-06
Authors: Amir Masoud Afsahi; Sam Sedaghat; Dina Moazamian; Ghazaleh Afsahi; Jiyo S Athertya; Hyungseok Jang; Ya-Jun Ma Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 6.055
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Yajun Ma; Erik W Dorthe; Lena Kakos; Nicole Le; Salem Alenezi; Robert L Sah; Eric Y Chang; Darryl D'Lima; Jiang Du Journal: Bone Rep Date: 2019-08-02
Authors: Ya-Jun Ma; Saeed Jerban; Hyungseok Jang; Douglas Chang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Saeed Jerban; Douglas G Chang; Yajun Ma; Hyungseok Jang; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 5.555