Literature DB >> 25977467

Repeatability of Radiotracer Uptake in Normal Abdominal Organs with ¹¹¹In-Pentetreotide Quantitative SPECT/CT.

Steven P Rowe1, Esther Vicente1, Nadège Anizan1, Hao Wang1, Jeffrey P Leal1, Martin A Lodge1, Eric C Frey1, Richard L Wahl2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: With an increasing emphasis on quantitation of SPECT imaging and its use in dosimetry to guide therapies, it is desirable to understand the repeatability in normal-organ SPECT uptake values (SPECT-UVs). We investigated the variability of normal abdominal organ uptake in repeated (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT studies.
METHODS: Nine patients with multiple (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT/CT studies for clinical purposes were evaluated. Volumes of interest were drawn for the abdominal organs and applied to SPECT-UVs. The variability of those values was assessed.
RESULTS: The average SPECT-UV for the liver (1.7 ± 0.6) was much lower than for the kidneys (right, 8.0 ± 2.4; left, 7.5 ± 1.7). Interpatient and intrapatient variability was similar (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.40-0.59) for all organs. The average coefficients of variation for each organ for each patient were obtained and averaged across all patients (0.26 for liver, 0.22 for right kidney, and 0.20 for left kidney). The coefficients of variation for the organs across all scans were 0.33 (liver), 0.30 (right kidney), and 0.22 (left kidney).
CONCLUSION: Variability across all patients and all scans for the liver was higher than reported with (18)F-FDG PET, though left kidney variability was similar to PET liver variability and left kidney uptake may be able to serve as an internal metric for determining the quantifiability of an (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT study.
© 2015 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  111In-pentetreotide SPECT; SPECT-UV; dosimetry; quantitative SPECT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25977467      PMCID: PMC4493864          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.155358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  13 in total

1.  Relative impact of scatter, collimator response, attenuation, and finite spatial resolution corrections in cardiac SPECT.

Authors:  G El Fakhri; I Buvat; H Benali; A Todd-Pokropek; R Di Paola
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  A Monte Carlo and physical phantom evaluation of quantitative In-111 SPECT.

Authors:  Bin He; Yong Du; Xiyun Song; W Paul Segars; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A collimator optimization method for quantitative imaging: application to Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT.

Authors:  Xing Rong; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using CT-derived corrections.

Authors:  Kathy Willowson; Dale L Bailey; Clive Baldock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  An evidence-based review of quantitative SPECT imaging and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Dale L Bailey; Kathy P Willowson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Factors affecting the repeatability of gamma camera calibration for quantitative imaging applications using a sealed source.

Authors:  N Anizan; H Wang; X C Zhou; R L Wahl; E C Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

Authors:  Richard L Wahl; Heather Jacene; Yvette Kasamon; Martin A Lodge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Factors affecting the stability and repeatability of gamma camera calibration for quantitative imaging applications based on a retrospective review of clinical data.

Authors:  Nadège Anizan; Hao Wang; Xian C Zhou; Robert F Hobbs; Richard L Wahl; Eric C Frey
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.138

View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of Tumor Burden on Quantitative [68Ga] DOTATOC Biodistribution.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Heribert Hänscheid; Jeffrey P Leal; Mehrbod S Javadi; Takahiro Higuchi; Martin A Lodge; Andreas K Buck; Martin G Pomper; Constantin Lapa; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with 18F-DCFPyL: Variability in Normal-Organ Uptake.

Authors:  Xin Li; Steven P Rowe; Jeffrey P Leal; Michael A Gorin; Mohamad E Allaf; Ashley E Ross; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin A Lodge; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with [18F]DCFPyL: Intrapatient and Interpatient Variability of Normal Organ Uptake.

Authors:  Karine Sahakyan; Xin Li; Martin A Lodge; Rudolf A Werner; Ralph A Bundschuh; Lena Bundschuh; Harshad R Kulkarni; Christiane Schuchardt; Richard P Baum; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Pomper; Ashley E Ross; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Simplifying volumes-of-interest (VOIs) definition in quantitative SPECT: Beyond manual definition of 3D whole-organ VOIs.

Authors:  Esther M Vicente; Martin A Lodge; Steven P Rowe; Richard L Wahl; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Use of a digital phantom developed by QIBA for harmonizing SUVs obtained from the state-of-the-art SPECT/CT systems: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Tadaki Nakahara; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Yasushi Yamamoto; Takashi Iimori; Kazuyuki Miyagawa; Tomoya Okamoto; Yoshiki Owaki; Nobuhiro Yada; Koichi Sawada; Ryotaro Tokorodani; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.138

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.