Literature DB >> 25592130

Factors affecting the repeatability of gamma camera calibration for quantitative imaging applications using a sealed source.

N Anizan1, H Wang, X C Zhou, R L Wahl, E C Frey.   

Abstract

Several applications in nuclear medicine require absolute activity quantification of single photon emission computed tomography images. Obtaining a repeatable calibration factor that converts voxel values to activity units is essential for these applications. Because source preparation and measurement of the source activity using a radionuclide activity meter are potential sources of variability, this work investigated instrumentation and acquisition factors affecting repeatability using planar acquisition of sealed sources. The calibration factor was calculated for different acquisition and geometry conditions to evaluate the effect of the source size, lateral position of the source in the camera field-of-view (FOV), source-to-camera distance (SCD), and variability over time using sealed Ba-133 sources. A small region of interest (ROI) based on the source dimensions and collimator resolution was investigated to decrease the background effect. A statistical analysis with a mixed-effects model was used to evaluate quantitatively the effect of each variable on the global calibration factor variability. A variation of 1 cm in the measurement of the SCD from the assumed distance of 17 cm led to a variation of 1-2% in the calibration factor measurement using a small disc source (0.4 cm diameter) and less than 1% with a larger rod source (2.9 cm diameter). The lateral position of the source in the FOV and the variability over time had small impacts on calibration factor variability. The residual error component was well estimated by Poisson noise. Repeatability of better than 1% in a calibration factor measurement using a planar acquisition of a sealed source can be reasonably achieved. The best reproducibility was obtained with the largest source with a count rate much higher than the average background in the ROI, and when the SCD was positioned within 5 mm of the desired position. In this case, calibration source variability was limited by the quantum noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25592130      PMCID: PMC4437762          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/1325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  An activity quantification method based on registration of CT and whole-body scintillation camera images, with application to 131I.

Authors:  Katarina Sjögreen; Michael Ljungberg; Sven-Erik Strand
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Comparison of conventional, model-based quantitative planar, and quantitative SPECT image processing methods for organ activity estimation using In-111 agents.

Authors:  Bin He; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Recovery of total I-131 activity within focal volumes using SPECT and 3D OSEM.

Authors:  Kenneth F Koral; Anastasia Yendiki; Yuni K Dewaraja
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development of a calibration methodology for large-volume, solid ⁶⁸Ge phantoms for traceable measurements in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  B E Zimmerman; L Pibida; L E King; D E Bergeron; J T Cessna; M M Mille
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using CT-derived corrections.

Authors:  Kathy Willowson; Dale L Bailey; Clive Baldock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Quantitative accuracy of clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT using ordered-subset expectation maximization with 3-dimensional resolution recovery, attenuation, and scatter correction.

Authors:  Johannes Zeintl; Alexander Hans Vija; Amos Yahil; Joachim Hornegger; Torsten Kuwert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Absolute quantification in SPECT.

Authors:  Philipp Ritt; Hans Vija; Joachim Hornegger; Torsten Kuwert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography standardized uptake values in clinical practice and assessing response to therapy.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; James W Fletcher
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  Accurate dosimetry in 131I radionuclide therapy using patient-specific, 3-dimensional methods for SPECT reconstruction and absorbed dose calculation.

Authors:  Yuni K Dewaraja; Scott J Wilderman; Michael Ljungberg; Kenneth F Koral; Kenneth Zasadny; Mark S Kaminiski
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Calibration of Traceable Solid Mock (131)I Phantoms Used in an International SPECT Image Quantification Comparison.

Authors:  B E Zimmerman; L Pibida; L E King; D E Bergeron; J T Cessna; M M Mille
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2013-08-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification: An IAEA phantom study.

Authors:  Brian E Zimmerman; Darko Grošev; Irène Buvat; Marco A Coca Pérez; Eric C Frey; Alan Green; Anchali Krisanachinda; Michael Lassmann; Michael Ljungberg; Lorena Pozzo; Kamila Afroj Quadir; Mariella A Terán Gretter; Johann Van Staden; Gian Luca Poli
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.820

2.  Repeatability of Radiotracer Uptake in Normal Abdominal Organs with ¹¹¹In-Pentetreotide Quantitative SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Esther Vicente; Nadège Anizan; Hao Wang; Jeffrey P Leal; Martin A Lodge; Eric C Frey; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Analysis of quantitative [I-123] mIBG SPECT/CT in a phantom and in patients with neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Samuel L Brady; Barry L Shulkin
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2019-12-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.