Rudolf A Werner1,2,3, Heribert Hänscheid1, Jeffrey P Leal3, Mehrbod S Javadi3, Takahiro Higuchi1, Martin A Lodge3, Andreas K Buck1,2, Martin G Pomper3,4, Constantin Lapa1, Steven P Rowe5,6. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany. 2. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) Center of Excellence, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany. 3. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. 4. James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N. Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. srowe8@jhmi.edu. 6. James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. srowe8@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As has been previously reported, the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging agent [68Ga]-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotate ([68Ga]DOTATATE) demonstrates lower uptake in normal organs in patients with a high neuroendocrine tumor (NET) burden. Given the higher SSTR affinity of [68Ga] DOTATATE, we aimed to quantitatively investigate the biodistribution of [68Ga]-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide ([68Ga]DOTATOC) to determine a potential correlation between uptake in normal organs and NET burden. PROCEDURES: Of the 44 included patients, 36/44 (82 %) patients demonstrated suspicious radiotracer uptake on [68Ga] DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT). Volumes of interest (VOIs) were defined for tumor lesions and normal organs (spleen, liver, kidneys, adrenals). Mean body weight corrected standardized uptake value (SUVmean) for normal organs was assessed and was used to calculate the corresponding mean specific activity uptake (Upt: fraction of injected activity per kg of tissue). For the entire tumor burden, SUVmean, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and the total mass (TBM) was calculated and the decay corrected tumor fractional uptake (TBU) was assessed. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlations between normal organ uptake and tumor burden. RESULTS: The median SUVmean was 18.7 for the spleen (kidneys, 9.2; adrenals, 6.8; liver, 5.6). For tumor burden, the median values were SUVmean 6.9, SUVmax 35.5, TBM 42.6 g, and TBU 1.2 %. With increasing volume of distribution, represented by lean body mass and body surface area (BSA), Upt decreased in kidneys, liver, and adrenal glands and SUVmean increased in the spleen. Correlation improved only for both kidneys and adrenals when the influence of the tumor uptake on the activity available for organ uptake was taken into account by the factor 1/(1-TBU). TBU was neither predictive for SUVmean nor for Upt in any of the organs. The distribution of organ Upt vs. BSA/(1-TBU) were not different for patients with minor TBU (<3 %) vs. higher TBU (>7 %), indicating that the correlations observed in the present study are explainable by the body size effect. High tumor mass and uptake mitigated against G1 NET. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant impact on normal organ biodistribution with increasing tumor burden on [68Ga] DOTATOC PET/CT. Potential implications include increased normal organ dose with [177Lu-DOTA]0-D-Phe1-Tyr3-Octreotide and decreased absolute lesion detection with [68Ga] DOTATOC in high NET burden.
PURPOSE: As has been previously reported, the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging agent [68Ga]-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotate ([68Ga]DOTATATE) demonstrates lower uptake in normal organs in patients with a high neuroendocrine tumor (NET) burden. Given the higher SSTR affinity of [68Ga] DOTATATE, we aimed to quantitatively investigate the biodistribution of [68Ga]-labeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide ([68Ga]DOTATOC) to determine a potential correlation between uptake in normal organs and NET burden. PROCEDURES: Of the 44 included patients, 36/44 (82 %) patients demonstrated suspicious radiotracer uptake on [68Ga] DOTATOC positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT). Volumes of interest (VOIs) were defined for tumor lesions and normal organs (spleen, liver, kidneys, adrenals). Mean body weight corrected standardized uptake value (SUVmean) for normal organs was assessed and was used to calculate the corresponding mean specific activity uptake (Upt: fraction of injected activity per kg of tissue). For the entire tumor burden, SUVmean, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and the total mass (TBM) was calculated and the decay corrected tumor fractional uptake (TBU) was assessed. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlations between normal organ uptake and tumor burden. RESULTS: The median SUVmean was 18.7 for the spleen (kidneys, 9.2; adrenals, 6.8; liver, 5.6). For tumor burden, the median values were SUVmean 6.9, SUVmax 35.5, TBM 42.6 g, and TBU 1.2 %. With increasing volume of distribution, represented by lean body mass and body surface area (BSA), Upt decreased in kidneys, liver, and adrenal glands and SUVmean increased in the spleen. Correlation improved only for both kidneys and adrenals when the influence of the tumor uptake on the activity available for organ uptake was taken into account by the factor 1/(1-TBU). TBU was neither predictive for SUVmean nor for Upt in any of the organs. The distribution of organ Upt vs. BSA/(1-TBU) were not different for patients with minor TBU (<3 %) vs. higher TBU (>7 %), indicating that the correlations observed in the present study are explainable by the body size effect. High tumor mass and uptake mitigated against G1 NET. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant impact on normal organ biodistribution with increasing tumor burden on [68Ga] DOTATOC PET/CT. Potential implications include increased normal organ dose with [177Lu-DOTA]0-D-Phe1-Tyr3-Octreotide and decreased absolute lesion detection with [68Ga] DOTATOC in high NET burden.
Authors: Xin Li; Steven P Rowe; Jeffrey P Leal; Michael A Gorin; Mohamad E Allaf; Ashley E Ross; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin A Lodge; Martin G Pomper Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-12-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Steven P Rowe; Esther Vicente; Nadège Anizan; Hao Wang; Jeffrey P Leal; Martin A Lodge; Eric C Frey; Richard L Wahl Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jonathan Strosberg; Ghassan El-Haddad; Edward Wolin; Andrew Hendifar; James Yao; Beth Chasen; Erik Mittra; Pamela L Kunz; Matthew H Kulke; Heather Jacene; David Bushnell; Thomas M O'Dorisio; Richard P Baum; Harshad R Kulkarni; Martyn Caplin; Rachida Lebtahi; Timothy Hobday; Ebrahim Delpassand; Eric Van Cutsem; Al Benson; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; Marianne Pavel; Jaime Mora; Jordan Berlin; Enrique Grande; Nicholas Reed; Ettore Seregni; Kjell Öberg; Maribel Lopera Sierra; Paola Santoro; Thomas Thevenet; Jack L Erion; Philippe Ruszniewski; Dik Kwekkeboom; Eric Krenning Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Kratochwil; M Stefanova; E Mavriopoulou; T Holland-Letz; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss; A Afshar-Oromieh; W Mier; U Haberkorn; F L Giesel Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Christian Boy; Till A Heusner; Thorsten D Poeppel; Anja Redmann-Bischofs; Nicole Unger; Walter Jentzen; Wolfgang Brandau; Klaus Mann; Gerald Antoch; Andreas Bockisch; Stephan Petersenn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Alexander R Haug; Axel Rominger; Mona Mustafa; Christoph Auernhammer; Burkhard Göke; Gerwin P Schmidt; Björn Wängler; Paul Cumming; Peter Bartenstein; Marcus Hacker Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: L Bodei; J Mueller-Brand; R P Baum; M E Pavel; D Hörsch; M S O'Dorisio; T M O'Dorisio; T M O'Dorisiol; J R Howe; M Cremonesi; D J Kwekkeboom; John J Zaknun Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Rudolf A Werner; Christina Bluemel; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Takahiro Higuchi; Ken Herrmann Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Rudolf A Werner; Alexander Weich; Takahiro Higuchi; Jan S Schmid; Andreas Schirbel; Michael Lassmann; Vanessa Wild; Martina Rudelius; Theodor Kudlich; Ken Herrmann; Michael Scheurlen; Andreas K Buck; Saskia Kropf; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Constantin Lapa Journal: Theranostics Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Rudolf A Werner; Thorsten Derlin; Steven P Rowe; Lena Bundschuh; Gabriel T Sheikh; Martin G Pomper; Sebastian Schulz; Takahiro Higuchi; Andreas K Buck; Frank M Bengel; Ralph A Bundschuh; Constantin Lapa Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Aleksander Kosmala; Sebastian E Serfling; Niklas Dreher; Thomas Lindner; Andreas Schirbel; Constantin Lapa; Takahiro Higuchi; Andreas K Buck; Alexander Weich; Rudolf A Werner Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Rudolf A Werner; Sebastian E Serfling; Constantin Lapa; Niklas Dreher; Philipp E Hartrampf; Steven P Rowe; Takahiro Higuchi; Andreas Schirbel; Alexander Weich; Stefanie Hahner; Martin Fassnacht Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 3.484