| Literature DB >> 25970468 |
Xiao-Juan Wang1, Da-Chuan Shi2, Xin-Yu Wang1, Juan Wang2, Yong-Shuai Sun1, Jian-Quan Liu3.
Abstract
Eutrema salsugineum (= Thellungiella salsuginea Brassicaceae), a species growing in highly saline habitats, is a good model for use in salt-stress research. However, its evolutionary migrations and genetic variations within and between disjunct regions from central Asia to northern China and North America remain largely unknown. We examined genetic variations and phylogeographic patterns of this species by sequencing ITS, 9 chloroplast (cp) DNA fragments (4379 bp) and 10 unlinked nuclear loci (6510 bp) of 24 populations across its distributional range. All markers suggested the high genetic poverty of this species and the limited number of genetic variations recovered was congruently partitioned between central Asia, northern China and North America. Further modelling of nuclear population-genetic data based on approximate bayesian computation (ABC) analyses indicated that the long-distance dispersals after the recent origin of E. salsugineum may have occurred from central Asia to the other two regions respectively within 20000 years. The fast demographic expansions should have occurred in northern China in a more recent past. Our study highlights the importance of using ABC analyses and nuclear population genetic data to trace evolutionary migrations of the disjunct distributions of the plants in the recent past.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25970468 PMCID: PMC4430283 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Sampling sites and cpDNA chlorotype frequencies.
A. (The total region) and B. (Northern China). Sampling sites and cpDNA chlorotypes in each sampled population from E. salsugineum (1–24) and its relative species E. halophila (25) and E. botschantzevii (26). C. Network of the chlorotype. Circle size is proportional to chlorotype frequency. Pie charts indicate chlorotype frequency within each population.
Fig 2STRUCTURE analyses of the sampled populations.
24 sampled E. salsuginea populations and individuals based on nuclear loci. Bar plots showing the proportion of inferred co-ancestry from Bayesian population assignment tests. Results are shown for K = 1 to K = 7. Population numbers in the Group A, B and C referred to those in the Fig 1. These three groups were further used for ABC analyses.
Nucleotide variation, haplotype diversity for 10 nuclear loci and 9 cpDNA from E. salsuginea populations.
| Locus | N | L | S | θwt | πt | θwa | πa | θsil | πsil | Nh | Hd | Rm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 99 | 517 | 2 | 0.00085 | 0.00075 | 0 | 0 | 0.00129 | 0.00146 | 3 | 0.411 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 545 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 462 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 931 | 1 | 0.00021 | 0.00041 | 0.00037 | 0.00072 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.381 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 496 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 800 | 2 | 0.00048 | 0.00068 | 0 | 0 | 0.00060 | 0.00084 | 3 | 0.516 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 953 | 5 | 0.00102 | 0.00084 | 0.00052 | 0.00066 | 0.00291 | 0.00155 | 5 | 0.602 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 468 | 1 | 0.00041 | 0.00072 | 0 | 0 | 0.00079 | 0.00137 | 2 | 0.338 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 711 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 99 | 627 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Average | 99 | 651 | 1.1 | 0.00030 | 0.00034 | 0.00009 | 0.00014 | 0.00056 | 0.00052 | 2 | 0.225 | 0 |
| Aligned | 99 | 6510 | 11 | 0.00036 | 0.00042 | - | - | - | - | 9 | 0.856 | 1 |
|
| ||||||||||||
|
| 99 | 405 | 7 | 0.00345 | 0.00281 | 0 | 0 | 0.00393 | 0.00321 | 6 | 0.632 | 1 |
| Average | 99 | 486.6 | 0.78 | 0.00038 | 0.00031 | 0 | 0 | 0.00044 | 0.00036 | - | 0.070 | - |
| Aligned | 99 | 4379 | 7 | 0.00032 | 0.00026 | 0 | 0 | - | - | 6 | 0.632 | 1 |
N, sample size; L, length in base pairs; S, number of segregating sizes; π, nucleotide diversity (πt, πa and πsil are in total locus, nonsynonymous site and silent site respectively); θ, Watterson’s parameter (θwt, θwa and θsil are in total locus, nonsynonymous site and silent site respectively); Nh, number of haplotypes; He, Nei’ s haplotype diversity; Rm, minimum number of recombinant events
¶, no polymorphisms
-, no data
§, 8 cpDNA fragments with no variations (see S3 Table) were not shown.
Fig 3Results of the mismatch distribution analyses for four groups.
A. All examined populations. B. Populations from northern China and Buriatia. C. Seven populations excluding those occurring in northern China and Buriatia. D. Five populations from North America and Russia (equaling to Group C). Dotted lines refer to the distributions expected for an expanding population, while the continuous lines represent the observed distributions of pairwise differences among samples.
Demographic tests based on mismatch distribution and LAMARC.
| Group |
|
| SSD ( | RAG ( | Growth rate (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 populations | 0 | 4.659 | 0.026 (0.30) | 0.06 (0.385) | -547.7 |
| 17 populations | 0 | 99999 | 0.0141 (0.02) | 0.1336 (0.002) | 351.89 |
| 7 populations | 0 | 5.59 | 0.1135 (0.054) | 0.2978 (0.02) | -809 |
| 2 populations | - | - | - | - | - |
| 5 populations | 0.002 | 2.139 | 0.0768 (0.228) | 0.2131 (0.299) | -1838.185 |
θ 0 and θ 1 are pre-expansion and post-expansion populations sizes; SSD, sum of squared deviations; RAG, the Harpending’s Raggedness index
a, with populations from northern China and Buriatia (Group B)
b, without populations from northern China and Buriatia
c, with populations from Xinjiang and Altai, both of which have the same sequence (Group A)
d, with populations from Tuva,Yakutsk and Canada (Group C)
-, no data.
Fig 4Estimation of the relative likelihood of four scenarios for the origin of E. salsuginea.
The DIYABC graphs showed the four best supported scenarios tested together. For each scenario, different colors indicated corresponding population sizes (Ne). Graphs indicate the relative likelihoods of the four scenarios above compared by (A) direct approach, and (B) logistic regression on the 1% (41,000) and 400 closest simulated data sets, respectively. The graphs illustrated that Scenario 1 is the best.
Fig 5The migration history of E. salsugineum.
A. The mostly favored scenario (scenario 1). Groups A, B and C equal to those defined by STUCTURE (K = 3) analyses. Width of population bars is proportional to effective size (Ne) and the fluted patterns (pentagon) in Group B indicates the expansion. B. Migration routes of E. salsugineum from central Asia to northern China and North America. Pie charts shows population assignment to groups based on structure analyses (K = 3). C. Populations came from northern China.