| Literature DB >> 27083979 |
Qingxiang Han1, Hiroyuki Higashi2, Yuki Mitsui3, Hiroaki Setoguchi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The respective role and relative importance of natural selection and gene flow in the process of population divergence has been a central theme in the speciation literature. A previous study presented conclusive evidence that wild radish on Japanese islands comprises two genetically isolated lineages: the southern and northern groups. However, a general understanding of the lineage isolation with frequent seed flow of the coastal plant species is still unclear. We surveyed nucleotide polymorphisms over 14 nuclear loci in 72 individuals across the Japan-Ryukyu Islands Arc to address the demographic history of wild radish utilising the isolation-with-migration (IM) model. In addition, we investigated the flowering times of individuals in different wild radish lineages, with and without cold exposure, to assess their respective vernalisation responses.Entities:
Keywords: Demographic history; Gene flow; Isolation-with-migration model; Kuroshio Current; Lineage differentiation; Natural selection; Vernalisation; Wild radish
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27083979 PMCID: PMC4833902 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0655-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Map showing the sampling locations. The main routes of the Kuroshio Current in the present (black line) and during the LGM (grey line) are adapted from the graph of Ujiié & Ujiié [47]. The dotted line shows the location of Tokara Strait. Population codes correspond to those in all tables and figures
Summary of the nucleotide polymorphisms and neutrality tests of fourteen loci for wild radish
| Locus | Aligned size (bp) | No. of seqs. | Largest non-recombining blocks (bp) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Neutrality tests | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 473 | 140 | 149 | 8 | 5 | 0.00608 | 0.01008 | 4 | 0.610 | 1.32690 | 1.00882 | 1.31890 |
|
| 420 | 142 | 151 | 6 | 5 | 0.00599 | 0.01271 | 6 | 0.506 | 2.26059* | −0.09887 | 0.81392 |
|
| 480 | 134 | 236 | 2 | 6 | 0.00465 | 0.00669 | 7 | 0.635 | 0.94466 | 1.09653 | 1.23822 |
|
| 378 | 144 | 260 | 2 | 4 | 0.00278 | 0.00654 | 4 | 0.583 | 2.53131* | 0.91024 | 1.70217 |
|
| 415 | 134 | 347 | 2 | 3 | 0.00179 | 0.00339 | 4 | 0.537 | 1.52497 | 0.80285 | 1.21693 |
|
| 559 | 140 | 175 | 5 | 3 | 0.00311 | 0.00576 | 4 | 0.517 | 1.44525 | −0.65975 | 0.01794 |
|
| 441 | 140 | 441 | 0 | 5 | 0.00206 | 0.00527 | 4 | 0.658 | 3.16093** | 1.00882 | 2.04191** |
|
| 577 | 136 | 280 | 4 | 4 | 0.00325 | 0.00374 | 5 | 0.372 | 0.30524 | −1.19153 | −0.82014 |
|
| 357 | 140 | 135 | 6 | 4 | 0.00537 | 0.00361 | 4 | 0.459 | −0.61567 | −2.83513* | −2.48960* |
|
| 366 | 144 | 274 | 2 | 3 | 0.00198 | 0.00209 | 4 | 0.536 | 0.09504 | −0.66570 | −0.49647 |
|
| 317 | 142 | 196 | 2 | 3 | 0.00277 | 0.00498 | 4 | 0.708 | 1.34849 | 0.79831 | 1.14817 |
|
| 235 | 142 | 235 | 0 | 11 | 0.00847 | 0.00281 | 5 | 0.494 | −1.66219 | −3.50335** | −3.38634** |
|
| 406 | 132 | 242 | 5 | 9 | 0.00682 | 0.01042 | 5 | 0.696 | 1.26908 | 1.30095 | 1.53412 |
|
| 332 | 132 | 112 | 3 | 2 | 0.00327 | 0.00760 | 3 | 0.441 | 1.93184 | 0.66462 | 1.24454 |
| Mean | 411 | 139 | 231 | 3.4 | 4.8 | 0.00417 | 0.00612 | 4.5 | 0.554 | - | - | - |
R estimate of minimum number of recombination events, S number of polymorphic sites, θ w Watterson’s estimator of θ per base pair, π nucleotide diversity, N h number of haplotypes, H d haplotype diversity, D Tajima’D and Fu & Li’s D* and F*
Significant levels: *, 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01
Fig. 2Individual assignment per population, as given by structure analysis for K = 2. The population numbers are shown beneath the bars
Fig. 3Principal coordinate analysis of 24 populations of wild radish in Japan based on their genetic distances. N: northern lineage; S: southern lineage
Maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) and the 95 % highest posterior density (HPD) intervals of demographic parameters from pairwise IMa2 multi-locus analyses
|
|
|
|
|
| 2NNmN | 2NSmS |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-model | |||||||||
| MLE | 0.094 | 0.082 | 1.582 | 51 | 11 | 3.188 | 1.351 | 0.027 | 17859 |
| HPD95Lo | 0.030 | 0.026 | 0.914 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.006 | 4173 |
| HPD95Hi | 0.246 | 0.200 | 2.642 | 201 | 165 | 7.162 | 7.064 | 0.071 | 47237 |
| M-model 1 | |||||||||
| MLE | 0.094 | 0.078 | 1.574 | 45 | 15 | 3.710 | 2.828 | 0.026 | 17922 |
| HPD95Lo | 0.034 | 0.026 | 0.914 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.073 | 0.006 | 3865 |
| HPD95Hi | 0.242 | 0.202 | 2.634 | 201 | 157 | 7.237 | 6.365 | 0.072 | 50251 |
| M-model 2 | |||||||||
| MLE | 0.094 | 0.086 | 1.582 | 37 | 11 | 3.581 | 3.140 | 0.027 | 18846 |
| HPD95Lo | 0.030 | 0.026 | 0.930 | 0 | 0 | 0.095 | 0 | 0.007 | 4623 |
| HPD95Hi | 0.250 | 0.202 | 2.634 | 205 | 167 | 6.920 | 7.090 | 0.072 | 50850 |
| M-model 3 | |||||||||
| MLE | 0.094 | 0.082 | 1.590 | 57 | 11 | 3.013 | 1.351 | 0.029 | 20269 |
| HPD95Lo | 0.034 | 0.030 | 0.898 | 0 | 0 | 0.163 | 0 | 0.007 | 4623 |
| HPD95Hi | 0.246 | 0.206 | 2.654 | 199 | 171 | 7.313 | 7.625 | 0.070 | 49428 |
θ S θ N and θ A indicated the effective population size of the southern region, the northern region and the ancestral populations, respectively. The migration rate is indicated as backwards in time, e.g. migration parameter (m N>S) indicates migration from northern to southern population in coalescent time (i.e. from population southern to northern forward in time). 2N m population migration rate from southern to northern population, 2N m population migration rate from to northern to southern population. The divergence time (T) was scaled by geometric means of substation rates per locus (1.498 × 10−6)
Fig. 4Marginal distribution of the posterior probabilities of demographic parameters estimated by IMa2 analysis : (a) θ A, θ Sand θ N are the effective population sizes of ancestral, southern and northern populations, respectively; (b) m S>N and m N>S are the gene flow from northern to southern lineage and southern to northern lineage, respectively; (c) the divergence time between southern and northern linage
Tests of the nested demographic models
| Model | Log(P) | df | 2LLR |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7.405 | 1 | 10.38 | ** |
|
| 10.03 | 1a | 5.136 | * |
|
| 8.692 | 1a | 7.805 | ** |
|
| −2066 | 2a | 4157 | ** |
|
| 10.18 | 1 | 4.837 | * |
|
| 7.626 | 2 | 9.936 | ** |
|
| 6.952 | 2a | 11.28 | ** |
|
| 0.9607 | 2a | 23.27 | ** |
|
| −2084 | 3a | 4192 | ** |
|
| 3.166 | 1 | 18.86 | ** |
|
| 0.5361 | 2 | 24.12 | ** |
|
| −89.13 | 2a | 203.5 | ** |
|
| −148.7 | 2a | 322.5 | ** |
|
| −2723 | 3a | 5472 | ** |
|
| −11.45 | 1 | 48.1 | ** |
|
| −17.2 | 2 | 59.59 | ** |
|
| −227.4 | 2a | 480 | ** |
|
| −65.72 | 2a | 156.6 | ** |
|
| −3210 | 3a | 6445 | ** |
|
| −34.8 | 2 | 87.86 | ** |
|
| −42.18 | 3 | 102.6 | ** |
|
| −236.9 | 3a | 492.1 | ** |
|
| −171.5 | 3a | 361.2 | ** |
|
| −3238 | 4a | 6494 | ** |
24 nested models (no migration and equal population size) were compared to the full model (significant migration and different population size; θ A, θ S, θ N, mS and mN). ‘Log (P)’ is the posterior probability of the model given data; ‘2LLR’ = 2× (Log(P)nested model-Log(P)full model), ‘df’ is the difference in number of parameters between nested and full model except where marked with a (in which case models have distributions of 2LLR that are a mixture), ‘p-value’ is the probability of achieving the test statistic (2LLR) by chance under the null model. The models with p < 0.05 represent rejection of the models.*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01
θ A, θ S, θ N are the effective population sizes of ancestral population, southern population and northern populations, respectively. m S and m N are the gene flow from northern to southern lineage and southern to northern lineage, respectively
Fig. 5Variation in flowering time: (a) vernalised; (b) not vernalised. Each box represents the interquartile range, containing 50 % of the values and the median (horizontal line across the box). Significance levels: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Fig. 6Map of the minimum temperature of the coldest month in Japan: (a) LGM period; (b) in the present