Literature DB >> 25956478

Axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks: a safe and effective approach for implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.

Federico Migliore1, Mariachiara Siciliano, Manuel De Lazzari, Sonia Ferretto, Chiara Dalla Valle, Alessandro Zorzi, Domenico Corrado, Sabino Iliceto, Emanuele Bertaglia.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Axillary vein puncture is an effective method for pacemaker lead insertion with less complications compared with subclavian vein puncture; however, there are limited data on implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation with this technique. We reported our experience with a blind axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks consisting of the outer edge of the first rib and the body surface of the second rib for ICD lead implantation.
METHODS: The study population included 103 consecutive patients (mean age 59 ± 9 years) referred for ICD implantation using axillary vein puncture without contrast venography. An 18-gauge needle was advanced toward the outer edge of the fist rib below the clavicle or the body surface of the second rib. If the vein was not entered, the needle was withdrawn and the puncture was repeated with slight variations of needle direction for a maximum of four times, then contrast-guided vein puncture was performed.
RESULTS: The total implanted leads were 152 including 103 right ventricular leads, 35 right atrial leads, and 14 left ventricular epicardial leads. Blind axillary vein puncture was successful obtained in 96 (93.2 %) patients. The rate of success was higher using the body surface of the second rib compared with the outer edge of the first rib (88.7 vs. 100 %; p = 0.04).Contrast venography was required in seven (6.8 %) patients because of vein course abnormality (n = 5) or vasospasm (n = 2). No acute complications or device-related complications were recorded during a mean follow-up of 12 ± 5 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Axillary vein access using fluoroscopic landmarks, especially the body surface of the second rib, is an effective approach for ICD implantation and offers the potential to avoid complications usually observed with traditional subclavian vein approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956478     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-015-0011-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  26 in total

1.  Venogram-guided extrathoracic subclavian vein puncture.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar Dora; V K Ajith Kumar; Anil Bhat; Jaganmohan A Tharakan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

2.  Subclavian crush syndrome: a cause of pacemaker lead fracture.

Authors:  F Femenia; J C L Diez; M Arce; A Baranchuk
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.167

3.  Evaluation of an ultrasonically guided venepuncture technique for the placement of permanent pacing electrodes.

Authors:  A Nash; C J Burrell; N J Ring; A J Marshall
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Radiographic predictors of lead conductor fracture.

Authors:  Andrew D Krahn; Josée Morissette; Ryan Lahm; Tarek Haddad; Walt W Baxter; Rick McVenes; Eugene Crystal; Félix Ayala-Paredes; Doug Cameron; Atul Verma; Christopher S Simpson; Derek V Exner; David H Birnie
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-09-27

5.  Axillary vein technique for pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads implantation: a safe and alternative approach?

Authors:  Federico Migliore; Antonio Curnis; Emanuele Bertaglia
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.160

6.  Comparison of the axillary venous approach and subclavian venous approach for efficacy of permanent pacemaker implantation. 8-Year follow-up results.

Authors:  Ki-Hun Kim; Kyoung-Min Park; Gi-Byoung Nam; Dae-Kyeong Kim; Minkyung Oh; Hyungoh Choi; Taek Jong Hong; Bo-Min Park; Guang-Won Seo; Pil-Sang Song; Dong-Kie Kim; Sang-Hoon Seol; Doo-Il Kim; You-Ho Kim; Kee-Joon Choi
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.993

7.  A comparison of lead placement through the subclavian vein technique with fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein technique for permanent pacemaker insertion.

Authors:  Gautam Sharma; Nagendra Boopathy Senguttuvan; Ajit Thachil; Darryl Leong; Nitish Naik; Rakesh Yadav; Rajnish Juneja; Vinay K Bahl
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Blind extrathoracic subclavian venipuncture for pacemaker implant: a 3-year experience in 250 patients.

Authors:  A Gardini; G Benedini
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  A comparison of steep and shallow needle trajectories in blind axillary vein puncture.

Authors:  Meng Jiang; Xin-Rong Gong; Sheng-Heng Zhou; Jun Pu; Jia-Liang Mao; Ben He
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Percutaneous axillary vein approach in pediatric pacing: comparison with subclavian vein approach.

Authors:  Massimo Stefano Silvetti; Silvia Placidi; Rosalinda Palmieri; Daniela Righi; Lucilla Ravà; Fabrizio Drago
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of ultrasound-guided vascular access during cardiac implantable device placement.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lin; Graham Adsit; Anne Barnett; Matthew Tattersall; Michael E Field; Jennifer Wright
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary/subclavian venous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation: a randomized study.

Authors:  Mattia Liccardo; Pasquale Nocerino; Salzano Gaia; Carmine Ciardiello
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Cardiac resynchronization in the elderly is beneficial, but could we implant our devices in old patients safer?

Authors:  Evgeny N Mikhaylov; Dmitry S Lebedev
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Periprocedural complications of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in very elderly patients with cognitive impairment: A prospective study.

Authors:  Fu Guan; Jianjun Peng; Shu Hou; Lihui Ren; Yunan Yue; Guangping Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Case report: A rare complication after the implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device: Contralateral pneumothorax with pneumopericardium and pneumomediastinum.

Authors:  Shao-Wei Lo; Ju-Yi Chen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.