Literature DB >> 25262117

Radiographic predictors of lead conductor fracture.

Andrew D Krahn1, Josée Morissette2, Ryan Lahm2, Tarek Haddad2, Walt W Baxter2, Rick McVenes2, Eugene Crystal2, Félix Ayala-Paredes2, Doug Cameron2, Atul Verma2, Christopher S Simpson2, Derek V Exner2, David H Birnie2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lead fracture is a limiting factor in high voltage lead durability. Fractures noted with the Medtronic Fidelis leads provide an opportunity to examine factors captured on implant chest x-ray that correlate with risk for lead conductor fracture. We evaluated contributory factors in a large population of fractures. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study at 8 Canadian centers that routinely capture anterior posterior and lateral chest x-rays within 2 weeks of implant. Cases were patients that experienced confirmed Medtronic Fidelis 6949 lead fracture based on standard definitions, matched one-to-one to controls for date of implant, sex, and age with normally functioning Fidelis leads from the same center. Select chart data and x-rays were collected for all patients. Radiographic measurements by ≥2 individuals per case/control were blinded to patient status. The data were analyzed using a time to failure multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with stratification for each matched pair. X-ray pairs from 111 fracture patients were compared with 111 controls (age 61.5±12.8 years, 75% male, 221 model 6949 leads). Six parameters included in the statistical analysis were significantly associated with risk of fracture, including slack/tortuosity measures, pulse generator and superior vena cava coil location, and angle of lead exit from the pocket.
CONCLUSIONS: Pocket, intravascular and intracardiac lead characteristics on x-ray correlate with risk of lead conductor fracture. These observations may be useful to direct implant technique to optimize lead durability. Validation in larger populations and other lead models may inform the application of these results.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  defibrillators, implantable; radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25262117     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.001612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  6 in total

1.  Axillary vein puncture using fluoroscopic landmarks: a safe and effective approach for implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Federico Migliore; Mariachiara Siciliano; Manuel De Lazzari; Sonia Ferretto; Chiara Dalla Valle; Alessandro Zorzi; Domenico Corrado; Sabino Iliceto; Emanuele Bertaglia
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Caudal fluoroscopy to guide venous access for pacemaker device implantation: should this now be standard practice?

Authors:  Hitesh C Patel; Carl Hayward; Shane Nanayakkara; Archer Broughton; Justin A Mariani
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-03-08

Review 3.  The Future of Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Christine M Albert; William G Stevenson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Intermittent Pacemaker Malfunction Caused by Continuous Compression of the Lead by the Clavicle (Subclavian Crush Syndrome).

Authors:  Ardian Rizal; Evit Ruspiono; Dinarsari Hayuning Putri
Journal:  Eur J Case Rep Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-27

5.  Clinical and radiographic predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead failure at the time of initial implantation.

Authors:  Eun-Jeong Kim; Giovanni Davogustto; Shi Huang; George H Crossley; Jay A Montgomery
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-07

6.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of the In Vivo Motion of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads.

Authors:  Tamas Szili-Torok; Jens Rump; Torsten Luther; Sing-Chien Yap
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.495

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.