Literature DB >> 25956263

Assessment of aneuploidy formation in human blastocysts resulting from donated eggs and the necessity of the embryos for aneuploidy screening.

Ghassan Haddad1, Maimin Deng, Cassie T Wang, Craig Witz, Daniel Williams, Jason Griffith, Josh Skorupski, Jimmy Gill, Wei-Hua Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of aneuploidy in human blastocysts resulting from donated eggs and embryo implantation after transfer of normal euploid embryos. Also, to assess the necessity of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for embryos produced with donor eggs.
METHODS: Blastocysts from donor-recipient cycles were biopsied for PGS (PGS group) and the samples were analyzed with DNA microarray. Euploid blastocysts were transferred to the recipients, and both clinical pregnancy and embryo implantation were examined and compared with embryos without PGS (control group).
RESULTS: After PGS, 39.1 % of blastocysts were abnormal, including aneuploidy and euploid with partial chromosome deletion and/or duplication. Transfer of normal euploid blastocysts brought about 72.4 % of clinical pregnancy, 65.5 % of ongoing/delivery and 54.9 % of embryo implantation rates; these rates were slightly higher than those in the control group (66.7, 54.0 and 47.8 %, respectively), but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. By contrast, the miscarriage rate was higher in the control group (19.2 %) than in the PGS group (9.5 %), but no statistical difference was observed. Transfer of two or more embryos did not significantly increase the ongoing/delivery rates in both groups, but significantly increased the twin pregnancy rates (50.0 % in the PGS group and 43.8 % in the control group). CONCLUSION(S): High proportions of human blastocysts derived from donor eggs are aneuploid. Although pregnancy and embryo implantation rates were increased, and miscarriage rates were reduced by transfer of embryos selected by PGS, the efficiency was not significantly different as compared to the control, suggesting that PGS may be necessary only in some specific situations, such as single embryo transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956263      PMCID: PMC4491073          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0492-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  28 in total

1.  Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Mireia Sandalinas; Tomas Escudero; Carmen Márquez; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Standardization of grading embryo morphology.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Michael Vernon; Jacob Mayer; G David Ball; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; David Wininger; William Gibbons; Joseph Conaghan; Judy E Stern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Kathleen Ferry; Jing Su; Xin Tao; Katherine Scott; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jannie van Echten-Arends; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Johanna C Korevaar; Maas Jan Heineman; Fulco van der Veen; Sjoerd Repping
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 15.610

5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in women older than 37 years.

Authors:  Peter Platteau; Catherine Staessen; An Michiels; Andre Van Steirteghem; Inge Liebaers; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Kathleen M Upham; Nathan R Treff; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers.

Authors:  D K Gardner; P Vella; M Lane; L Wagley; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  [Transfer of only a single embryo in in-vitro fertilisation].

Authors:  N S Macklon; B C Fauser
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2003-07-05

9.  Increased rate of aneuploid embryos in young women with previous aneuploid conceptions.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Mireia Sandalinas; Cristina Magli; Luca Gianaroli; Jacques Cohen; Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  19 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic testing and chances of a healthy live birth amongst recipients of fresh donor oocytes in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra Roeca; Rachel Johnson; Nichole Carlson; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Euploid rates among oocyte donors: is there an optimal age for donation?

Authors:  Luis R Hoyos; Connie Y Cheng; Kathleen Brennan; Gary Hubert; Brandon Wang; Richard P Buyalos; Molly Quinn; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Contraction behaviour reduces embryo competence in high-quality euploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Xavier Viñals Gonzalez; Rabi Odia; Suzanne Cawood; Matthew Gaunt; Wael Saab; Svidrya Seshadri; Paul Serhal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies does not increase success rates in fresh oocyte donation cycles: a paired cohort study.

Authors:  Carolina Lumertz Martello; Marcos Iuri Roos Kulmann; Luiza Mezzomo Donatti; Adriana Bos-Mikich; Nilo Frantz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The effect of ovarian stimulation on aneuploidy of early aborted tissues and preimplantation blastocysts: comparison of the GnRH agonist long protocol with the GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Jing Zhang; Nan Zhao; Yuan Ma; Xiyi Wang; Xingqing Gou; Ying Ju; Hengde Zhang; Shuqiang Chen; Xiaohong Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Nicole Doyle; Michelle Gainty; Allison Eubanks; Joseph Doyle; Heidi Hayes; Michael Tucker; Kate Devine; Alan DeCherney; Michael Levy; Samad Jahandideh; Micah Hill
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients.

Authors:  Amy Kaing; Lindsay L Kroener; Robyn Tassin; Man Li; Lian Liu; Richard Buyalos; Gary Hubert; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Transfer the best and biopsy the rest? Blastocyst euploidy rates differ by morphology and day of biopsy.

Authors:  Katherine E McDaniel; Michael S Awadalla; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Influence of Trophectoderm Biopsy Prior to Frozen Blastocyst Transfer on Obstetrical Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael S Awadalla; Kristen E Park; Kyle R Latack; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady; Richard J Paulson
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.060

10.  Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for fresh donor oocyte cycles.

Authors:  Maria Facadio Antero; Bhuchitra Singh; Apoorva Pradhan; Megan Gornet; William G Kearns; Valerie Baker; Mindy S Christianson
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.