Literature DB >> 20532975

Standardization of grading embryo morphology.

Catherine Racowsky, Michael Vernon, Jacob Mayer, G David Ball, Barry Behr, Kimball O Pomeroy, David Wininger, William Gibbons, Joseph Conaghan, Judy E Stern.   

Abstract

Standardization of morphological assessment for embryo grading system was developed and is being implemented by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART). A recent European consensus conference of embryologists from Europe and America is working toward adopting an embryo classification system modeled similarly to that of SART which, if adopted, would produce a de facto international standard to aid cross border collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20532975      PMCID： PMC2941588          DOI： 10.1007/s10815-010-9443-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN： 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  7 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of human embryonic growth in vitro and the selection of high-quality embryos for transfer.

Authors:  Irene Boiso; Anna Veiga; Robert G Edwards
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Jihoon Kim; John D Biggers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Utility of the national embryo morphology data collection by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART): correlation between day-3 morphology grade and live-birth outcome.

Authors:  Michael Vernon; Judy E Stern; G David Ball; David Wininger; Jacob Mayer; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Judy E Stern; William E Gibbons; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; John D Biggers
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality.

Authors:  J M Cummins; T M Breen; K L Harrison; J M Shaw; L M Wilson; J F Hennessey
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1986-10

6.  Comparison of pronuclear zygote morphology and early cleavage status of zygotes as additional criteria in the selection of day 3 embryos: a randomized study.

Authors:  Christopher Chen; Suresh Kattera
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The graduated embryo score predicts the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies better than a single day 3 evaluation and achieves results associated with blastocyst transfer from day 3 embryo transfer.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Fisch; Geoffrey Sher; Mark Adamowicz; Levent Keskintepe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.329
  7 in total
  40 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Johnny Juhl Hindkjaer; Marie Louise Grøndahl; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Blastocyst expansion score and trophectoderm morphology strongly predict successful clinical pregnancy and live birth following elective single embryo blastocyst transfer (eSET): a national study.

Authors:  Stephanie Marshall Thompson; Ndidiamaka Onwubalili; Kelecia Brown; Sangita K Jindal; Peter G McGovern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  GnRH triggering may improve euploidy and live birth rate in hyper-responders: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Justin Tan; Chen Jing; Lisa Zhang; Jasmine Lo; Arohumam Kan; Gary Nakhuda
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A predictive model for high-quality blastocyst based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry.

Authors:  Cheng-He Yu; Ruo-Peng Zhang; Juan Li; Zhou-Cun A
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Blastulation timing is associated with differential mitochondrial content in euploid embryos.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Nabil Arrach; Katherine Rhodes-Long; Wael Salem; Lynda K McGinnis; Karine Chung; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Mitochondrial metabolic substrate utilization in granulosa cells reflects body mass index and total follicle stimulating hormone dosage in in vitro fertilization patients.

Authors:  Richard J Kordus; Akhtar Hossain; Henry E Malter; Holly A LaVoie
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Ryan J Heitmann; Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Alan H DeCherney; Eric A Widra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Judy E Stern; Sangita K Jindal; Catherine Racowsky; G David Ball
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The importance of the cleavage stage morphology evaluation for blastocyst transfer in patients with good prognosis.

Authors:  Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita C S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Transfer the best and biopsy the rest? Blastocyst euploidy rates differ by morphology and day of biopsy.

Authors:  Katherine E McDaniel; Michael S Awadalla; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.344
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.