Luis R Hoyos1, Connie Y Cheng2, Kathleen Brennan2, Gary Hubert2,3, Brandon Wang3, Richard P Buyalos2,3, Molly Quinn2, Mousa Shamonki2,3. 1. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Room 27-139 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. lhoyosmartinez@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Room 27-139 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. 3. Fertility and Surgical Associates of California, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine cycle blastocyst euploid rates among age subgroups of oocyte donors. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of ova donation in vitro fertilization cycles (OD-IVF) for which trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or next generation gene sequencing (NGS) was employed between January 2015 and December 2018 in a single high-volume fertility center. RESULTS: Compared to oocyte donors age 26-30, oocyte donors age ≤ 25 had similar cycle blastocyst euploid rates (80 [66.7, 87.5]%, vs. 75 [62.5, 87.5]%, median [IQR], p = 0.07), blastocyst formation rates (66.7 [50, 75]%, vs. 62.5 [52, 75]%, p = 0.55), and number of retrieved oocytes (29 [23, 37] vs. 27 [20, 35], p = 0.18). Age of oocyte donor from 18 to 34 was not correlated with cycle blastocyst euploid rate. CONCLUSION: Oocyte donors age ≤ 25 had similar cycle blastocyst euploid rates, blastocyst formation rates, and number of retrieved oocytes compared to donors age 26-30. There was no correlation between cycle blastocyst euploid rates and age of the oocyte donor from 18 to 34 years. Given the lack of significant age-related change in cycle blastocyst euploid rates, our data support existing practices which do not favor a specific age subgroup of young oocyte donors.
PURPOSE: To examine cycle blastocyst euploid rates among age subgroups of oocyte donors. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of ova donation in vitro fertilization cycles (OD-IVF) for which trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or next generation gene sequencing (NGS) was employed between January 2015 and December 2018 in a single high-volume fertility center. RESULTS: Compared to oocyte donors age 26-30, oocyte donors age ≤ 25 had similar cycle blastocyst euploid rates (80 [66.7, 87.5]%, vs. 75 [62.5, 87.5]%, median [IQR], p = 0.07), blastocyst formation rates (66.7 [50, 75]%, vs. 62.5 [52, 75]%, p = 0.55), and number of retrieved oocytes (29 [23, 37] vs. 27 [20, 35], p = 0.18). Age of oocyte donor from 18 to 34 was not correlated with cycle blastocyst euploid rate. CONCLUSION: Oocyte donors age ≤ 25 had similar cycle blastocyst euploid rates, blastocyst formation rates, and number of retrieved oocytes compared to donors age 26-30. There was no correlation between cycle blastocyst euploid rates and age of the oocyte donor from 18 to 34 years. Given the lack of significant age-related change in cycle blastocyst euploid rates, our data support existing practices which do not favor a specific age subgroup of young oocyte donors.
Authors: Kathleen H Hong; Jason M Franasiak; Marie M Werner; George Patounakis; Caroline R Juneau; Eric J Forman; Richard T Scott Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Rossella Mazzilli; Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Antonio Capalbo; Lisa Dovere; Erminia Alviggi; Ludovica Dusi; Carlo Foresta; Francesco Lombardo; Andrea Lenzi; Herman Tournaye; Carlo Alviggi; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2017-10-03 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Jennifer F Kawwass; Michael Monsour; Sara Crawford; Dmitry M Kissin; Donna R Session; Aniket D Kulkarni; Denise J Jamieson Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Maria Giulia Minasi; Elisabetta Cursio; Pier Francesco Greco; Paolo Barillari Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Maria Facadio Antero; Bhuchitra Singh; Apoorva Pradhan; Megan Gornet; William G Kearns; Valerie Baker; Mindy S Christianson Journal: F S Rep Date: 2020-12-09