Literature DB >> 29980895

Contraction behaviour reduces embryo competence in high-quality euploid blastocysts.

Xavier Viñals Gonzalez1, Rabi Odia2, Suzanne Cawood2, Matthew Gaunt2, Wael Saab3, Svidrya Seshadri3, Paul Serhal3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study is to investigate how blastocyst contraction behaviour affects the reproductive competence in high-quality euploid embryos.
METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-six high-quality blastocysts derived from 190 patients (mean age 38.05 (SD = 2.9) years) who underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) from January 2016 to October 2017 were included in this study. PGT-A results were reported as euploid or aneuploid. Aneuploid embryos were sub-classified into three categories: monosomy, trisomy and complex aneuploid. Retrospective studies of time-lapse monitoring (TLM) of those embryos were analysed and reproductive outcome of transferred embryos was collected.
RESULTS: A total of 234/896 were euploid (26.1%) whilst 662/896 (73.9%) blastocysts were proven to be aneuploid from which 116 (17.6%) presented monosomies, 136 (20.5%) trisomies and 410 (61.9%) were complex aneuploid. The most frequent chromosomal complements were trisomies affecting chromosome 21 and monosomies involving chromosomes 16 and 22. Data analysis showed a statistical difference in the number of contractions being reported greater in aneuploid when compared to euploid embryos (0.6 vs 1.57; p < 0.001). Analysis of the aneuploid embryos showed that monosomies present less number of contractions when compared to embryos affected with trisomies or complex aneuploidies (1.23 vs 1.53 and 1.40; p < 0.05). No difference was observed when comparing the latter two groups. Euploid embryos presenting at least one contraction resulted in lower implantation and clinical pregnancy rates when compared to blastocysts that do not display this event (47.6 vs 78.5% and 40.0 vs 59.0% respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Most aneuploid blastocysts diagnosed by PGT-A have complex aneuploidies, showing that aneuploid embryos can develop after genomic activation and reaching high morphological scores. It becomes clear that embryo contraction, despite being a physiological feature during blastulation, is conditioned by the ploidy status of the embryo. Furthermore, the presence of contractions may compromise implantation rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst contraction; Next-generation sequencing; Ploidy; Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies; Time-lapse monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29980895      PMCID: PMC6086804          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1246-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  27 in total

1.  Validation of next-generation sequencing for comprehensive chromosome screening of embryos.

Authors:  Allen Kung; Santiago Munné; Brandon Bankowski; Alison Coates; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Aishling Ahlström; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Thorir Hardarson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts.

Authors:  Tyl H Taylor; Jennifer L Patrick; Susan A Gitlin; J Michael Wilson; Jack L Crain; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.

Authors:  Belén Aparicio-Ruiz; Natalia Basile; Sonia Pérez Albalá; Fernando Bronet; José Remohí; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients.

Authors:  Amy Kaing; Lindsay L Kroener; Robyn Tassin; Man Li; Lian Liu; Richard Buyalos; Gary Hubert; Mousa Shamonki
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group.

Authors:  H Nadir Ciray; Alison Campbell; Inge Errebo Agerholm; Jesús Aguilar; Sandrine Chamayou; Marga Esbert; Shabana Sayed
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Arrested human embryos are more likely to have abnormal chromosomes than developing embryos from women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Shu-Tao Qi; Li-Feng Liang; Ye-Xing Xian; Jian-Qiao Liu; Weihua Wang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 4.234

Review 9.  Current status of comprehensive chromosome screening for elective single-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Ming-Yih Wu; Kuang-Han Chao; Chin-Der Chen; Li-Jung Chang; Shee-Uan Chen; Yu-Shih Yang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 10.  Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence?

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Antonio Capalbo; Giovanna Orlando; Fabio Sapienza; Silvia Colamaria; Antonio Palagiano; Carlo Bulletti; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  4 in total

1.  Spontaneous blastocyst collapse as an embryo marker of low pregnancy outcome: A Time-Lapse study.

Authors:  Romualdo Sciorio; K J Thong; Susan J Pickering
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-01-30

Review 2.  Time-Lapse Embryo culture: A better understanding of embryo development and clinical application.

Authors:  Silvana Márquez-Hinojosa; Luis Noriega-Hoces; Luis Guzmán
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-08-04

3.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19

4.  Associations between a new day 4 embryo grading system and implantation rates in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Authors:  Hongxing Li; Xiaojuan Xu; Yuanxue Jing; Lin Liu; Yiqing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.