Jason M Franasiak1, Eric J Forman2, Kathleen H Hong2, Marie D Werner2, Kathleen M Upham3, Nathan R Treff2, Richard T Scott2. 1. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick. Electronic address: jfranasiak@rmanj.com. 2. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick; Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Morristown, New Jersey. 3. Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Morristown, New Jersey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the age of the female partner and the prevalence and nature of human embryonic aneuploidy. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Academic. PATIENT(S): Trophectoderm biopsies. INTERVENTION(S): Comprehensive chromosomal screening performed on patients with blastocysts available for biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Evaluation of the impact of maternal age on the prevalence of aneuploidy, the probability of having no euploid embryos within a cohort, the complexity of aneuploidy as gauged by the number of aneuploid chromosomes, and the trisomy/monosomy ratio. RESULT(S): Aneuploidy increased predictably after 26 years of age. A slightly increased prevalence was noted at younger ages, with >40% aneuploidy in women 23 years and under. The no euploid embryo rate was lowest (2% to 6%) in women aged 26 to 37, was 33% at age 42, and was 53% at age 44. Among the biopsies with aneuploidy, 64% involved a single chromosome, 20% two chromosomes, and 16% three chromosomes, with the proportion of more complex aneuploidy increasing with age. Finally, the trisomy/monosomy ratio approximated 1 and increased minimally with age. CONCLUSION(S): The lowest risk for embryonic aneuploidy was between ages 26 and 30. Both younger and older age groups had higher rates of aneuploidy and an increased risk for more complex aneuploidies. The overall risk did not measurably change after age 43. Trisomies and monosomies are equally prevalent.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the age of the female partner and the prevalence and nature of humanembryonic aneuploidy. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Academic. PATIENT(S): Trophectoderm biopsies. INTERVENTION(S): Comprehensive chromosomal screening performed on patients with blastocysts available for biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Evaluation of the impact of maternal age on the prevalence of aneuploidy, the probability of having no euploid embryos within a cohort, the complexity of aneuploidy as gauged by the number of aneuploid chromosomes, and the trisomy/monosomy ratio. RESULT(S): Aneuploidy increased predictably after 26 years of age. A slightly increased prevalence was noted at younger ages, with >40% aneuploidy in women 23 years and under. The no euploid embryo rate was lowest (2% to 6%) in women aged 26 to 37, was 33% at age 42, and was 53% at age 44. Among the biopsies with aneuploidy, 64% involved a single chromosome, 20% two chromosomes, and 16% three chromosomes, with the proportion of more complex aneuploidy increasing with age. Finally, the trisomy/monosomy ratio approximated 1 and increased minimally with age. CONCLUSION(S): The lowest risk for embryonic aneuploidy was between ages 26 and 30. Both younger and older age groups had higher rates of aneuploidy and an increased risk for more complex aneuploidies. The overall risk did not measurably change after age 43. Trisomies and monosomies are equally prevalent.
Authors: Ehud Karavani; Or Zuk; Danny Zeevi; Nir Barzilai; Nikos C Stefanis; Alex Hatzimanolis; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Leonid Kruglyak; Gil Atzmon; Max Lam; Todd Lencz; Shai Carmi Journal: Cell Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Larysa Y Pylyp; Lyudmyla O Spynenko; Nataliya V Verhoglyad; Anna O Mishenko; Dmytro O Mykytenko; Valery D Zukin Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: T Adriaenssens; I Van Vaerenbergh; W Coucke; I Segers; G Verheyen; E Anckaert; M De Vos; J Smitz Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Nathan R Treff; Rebecca L Krisher; Xin Tao; Heather Garnsey; Chelsea Bohrer; Elena Silva; Jessica Landis; Deanne Taylor; Richard T Scott; Teresa K Woodruff; Francesca E Duncan Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Bettina Toth; Dunja Maria Baston-Büst; Hermann M Behre; Alexandra Bielfeld; Michael Bohlmann; Kai Bühling; Ralf Dittrich; Maren Goeckenjan; Katharina Hancke; Sabine Kliesch; Frank-Michael Köhn; Jan Krüssel; Ruben Kuon; Jana Liebenthron; Frank Nawroth; Verena Nordhoff; Germar-Michael Pinggera; Nina Rogenhofer; Sabine Rudnik-Schöneborn; Hans-Christian Schuppe; Andreas Schüring; Vanadin Seifert-Klauss; Thomas Strowitzki; Frank Tüttelmann; Kilian Vomstein; Ludwig Wildt; Tewes Wischmann; Dorothea Wunder; Johannes Zschocke Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Katherine A Green; Marie D Werner; Jason M Franasiak; Caroline R Juneau; Kathleen H Hong; Richard T Scott Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.412