Literature DB >> 33768514

Influence of Trophectoderm Biopsy Prior to Frozen Blastocyst Transfer on Obstetrical Outcomes.

Michael S Awadalla1, Kristen E Park2, Kyle R Latack2, Lynda K McGinnis3, Ali Ahmady3, Richard J Paulson3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine if trophectoderm biopsy prior to autologous frozen blastocyst transfer in programmed cycles is associated with gestational age at delivery, birth weight, or cesarean rate in viable singleton gestations. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients at a university-affiliated center that had viable singleton gestations after autologous frozen blastocyst transfer in programmed cycles. Obstetrical outcomes of 67 pregnancies after blastocyst trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing were compared to 78 pregnancies from unbiopsied blastocysts. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in terms of maternal age, BMI, or ethnicity. There were no differences in the preimplantation genetic testing cohort compared to the reference cohort for median gestational age at delivery (39.4 vs 39.4 weeks, p = 0.80), median birth weight (3420 vs 3430 g, p = 0.97), cesarean rate (51% vs 44%, p = 0.41), preterm delivery rate (12% vs 8%, p = 0.41), rate of low birth weight (12% vs 9%, p = 0.59), or rate of birth weight over 4000 g (13% vs 8%, p = 0.29). There were no differences in the primary outcomes with subgroup analysis based on fetal sex, single embryo transfer, gravidity, history of prior term birth, and maternal age < or ≥ 35 years. Trophectoderm biopsy prior to frozen blastocyst transfer in programmed cycles was not associated with adverse obstetrical outcomes related to gestational age at delivery, birth weight, or cesarean rate.
© 2021. Society for Reproductive Investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frozen embryo transfer; In vitro fertilization; Obstetrical outcomes; Programmed cycle

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33768514     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00552-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   3.060


  18 in total

Review 1.  Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Katherine L Scott; Kathleen H Hong; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Santiago Munné; Brian Kaplan; John L Frattarelli; Tim Child; Gary Nakhuda; F Nicholas Shamma; Kaylen Silverberg; Tasha Kalista; Alan H Handyside; Mandy Katz-Jaffe; Dagan Wells; Tony Gordon; Sharyn Stock-Myer; Susan Willman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Preimplantation genetic screening: what is the clinical efficiency?

Authors:  Richard J Paulson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure During Pregnancy: Effects on Postnatal Development and Life.

Authors:  Shayenthiran Sreetharan; Christopher Thome; Sujeenthar Tharmalingam; Devon E Jones; Adomas V Kulesza; Neelam Khaper; Simon J Lees; Joanna Y Wilson; Douglas R Boreham; T C Tai
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Assessment of aneuploidy formation in human blastocysts resulting from donated eggs and the necessity of the embryos for aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Ghassan Haddad; Maimin Deng; Cassie T Wang; Craig Witz; Daniel Williams; Jason Griffith; Josh Skorupski; Jimmy Gill; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy.

Authors:  Ashley W Tiegs; Xin Tao; Yiping Zhan; Christine Whitehead; Julia Kim; Brent Hanson; Emily Osman; Thomas J Kim; George Patounakis; Jacqueline Gutmann; Arthur Castelbaum; Emre Seli; Chaim Jalas; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Kathleen M Upham; Eric J Forman; Tian Zhao; Nathan R Treff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a national multicenter obstetric and neonatal follow-up study.

Authors:  Bjorn Bay; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Josephine Gabriela Lemmen; Birte Degn; Iben Anne Rasmussen; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Trophectoderm biopsy protocols can affect clinical outcomes: time to focus on the blastocyst biopsy technique.

Authors:  Patrizia Rubino; Lucia Tapia; Rafael Ruiz de Assin Alonso; Kohar Mazmanian; Lisa Guan; Lindsay Dearden; Alleson Thiel; Caroline Moon; Bradford Kolb; John M Norian; Jeffrey Nelson; John Wilcox; Tih Tan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Number of biopsied trophectoderm cells is likely to affect the implantation potential of blastocysts with poor trophectoderm quality.

Authors:  Shuoping Zhang; Keli Luo; Dehua Cheng; Yueqiu Tan; Changfu Lu; Hui He; Yifan Gu; Guangxiu Lu; Fei Gong; Ge Lin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of trophectoderm biopsy for PGT-A on live birth rate per embryo in good prognosis patients.

Authors:  Michael S Awadalla; Ravi Agarwal; Jacqueline R Ho; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.493

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.