| Literature DB >> 25955889 |
Ebtehal S Al-Abdullah1, Hanaa M Al-Tuwaijri2, Hanan M Hassan3, Monirah A Al-Alshaikh4, Elsayed E Habib5,6, Ali A El-Emam7.
Abstract
The reaction of 1-adamantyl isothiocyanate 4 with the various cyclic secondary amines yielded the corresponding N-(1-adamantyl)carbothioamides 5a-e, 6, 7, 8a-c and 9. Similarly, the reaction of 4 with piperazine and trans-2,5-dimethylpiperazine in 2:1 molar ratio yielded the corresponding N,N'-bis(1-adamantyl)piperazine-1,4-dicarbothioamides 10a and 10b, respectively. The reaction of N-(1-adamantyl)-4-ethoxycarbonylpiperidine-1-carbothioamide 8c with excess hydrazine hydrate yielded the target carbohydrazide 11, in addition to 4-(1-adamantyl)thiosemicarbazide 12 as a minor product. The reaction of the carbohydrazide 11 with methyl or phenyl isothiocyanate followed by heating in aqueous sodium hydroxide yielded the 1,2,4-triazole analogues 14a and 14b. The reaction of the carbohydrazide 11 with various aromatic aldehydes yielded the corresponding N'-arylideneamino derivatives 15a-g. The compounds 5a-e, 6, 7, 8a-c, 9, 10a, 10b, 14a, 14b and 15a-g were tested for in vitro antimicrobial activity against certain strains of pathogenic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and the yeast-like fungus Candida albicans. The compounds 5c, 5d, 5e, 6, 7, 10a, 10b, 15a, 15f and 15g showed potent antibacterial activity against one or more of the tested microorganisms. The oral hypoglycemic activity of compounds 5c, 6, 8b, 9, 14a and 15b was determined in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. Compound 5c produced significant reduction of serum glucose levels, compared to gliclazide.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25955889 PMCID: PMC6272754 DOI: 10.3390/molecules20058125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of the target N-(1-adamanty)carbothioamides 5a–e, 6, 7, 8a–c, 9, 10a and 10b.
Crystallization solvents, melting points, yield percentages, molecular formulae and molecular weights of compounds 5a–e, 6, 7, 8a–c, 9, 10a, 10b, 14a, 14b and 15a–g.
| Comp. No. | R | Cryst. Solv. | Mp (°C) | Yield (%) | Molecular Formula (Mol. Wt.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| C2H5 | EtOH | 150–152 | 77 | C17H29N3S (307.50) |
|
| COOC2H5 | EtOH | 121–123 | 68 | C18H29N3O2S (351.51) |
|
| C6H5 | EtOH | 174–176 | 91 | C21H29N3S (355.54) |
|
| 2-CH3OC6H4 | EtOH | 137–139 | 95 | C22H31N3OS (385.57) |
|
| C6H5CH2 | EtOH | 146–148 | 95 | C22H31N3S (369.57) |
|
| - | EtOH | 139–141 | 88 | C15H24N2OS (280.43) |
|
| - | EtOH | 175–177 | 74 | C15H24N2S (264.43) |
|
| H | EtOH | 145–147 | 78 | C16H26N2S (278.46) |
|
| C6H5 | EtOH | 137–139 | 90 | C22H30N2S (354.55) |
|
| COOC2H5 | EtOH | 166–168 | 78 | C19H30N2O2S (350.52) |
|
| - | EtOH | 147–149 | 88 | C20H26N2S (326.5) |
|
| H | DMF | 227–229 | 89 | C26H40N4S2 (472.75) |
|
| CH3 | DMF | 232–234 | 92 | C28H44N4S2 (500.81) |
|
| CH3 | EtOH | 200–202 | 38 | C19H29N5S2 (391.6) |
|
| C6H5 | DMF | >300 | 44 | C24H31N5S2 (453.67) |
|
| 2-OH | EtOH | 196–198 | 65 | C24H32N4O2S (440.6) |
|
| 3,4-Cl2 | EtOH/CHCl3 | 237–237 | 61 | C24H30Cl2N4OS (493.49) |
|
| 2,6-Cl2 | EtOH | 199–201 | 54 | C24H30Cl2N4OS (493.49) |
|
| 3,4-(OCH3)2 | EtOH | 154–156 | 48 | C26H36N4O3S (484.65) |
|
| 3,4,5-(OCH3)3 | EtOH | 128–130 | 43 | C27H38N4O4S (514.68) |
|
| 2-OH-5-OCH3 | EtOH/CHCl3 | 170–172 | 44 | C25H34N4O3S (470.63) |
|
| 3-OC2H5-4-OH | EtOH/CHCl3 | 194–196 | 58 | C26H36N4O3S (484.65) |
Scheme 2Synthesis of the target N-(1-adamanty)carbothioamides 14a,b and 15a–h.
Antimicrobial activity of compounds 5a–e, 6, 7, 8a–c, 9, 10a, 10b, 14a, 14b and 15a–g (200 μg/8 mm disc), the broad spectrum antibacterial drugs Gentamicin (100 μg/8 mm disc), Ampicillin (100 μg/8 mm disc) and the antifungal drug Clotrimazole (100 μg/8 mm disc) against Staphylococcus aureus IFO 3060 (SA), Bacillus subtilis IFO 3007 (BS), Micrococcus luteus IFO 3232 (ML), Escherichia coli IFO 3301 (EC), Pseudomonas aeuroginosa IFO 3448 (PA), and Candida albicans IFO 0583 (CA).
| Comp. No. | Clog | Diameter of Growth Inhibition Zone (mm) a | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 4.32 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 4.32 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 4.77 | 20 (8) b | 24 (2) b | 16 | 15 | 14 | - |
|
| 4.79 | 19 (4) b | 22 (4) b | 17 | 12 | - | - |
|
| 5.52 | 15 | 19 (8) b | 12 | 15 | 12 | - |
|
| 3.23 | 22 (2) b | 20 (1) b | 19 (4) b | 15 | 12 | - |
|
| 4.06 | 18 (8) b | 20 (2) b | 18 (4) b | 15 | 13 | - |
|
| 4.62 | 12 | 14 | 12 | - | - | - |
|
| 6.03 | 16 | 16 | 14 | - | - | - |
|
| 4.01 | 12 | 13 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 5.48 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 6.86 | 25 (32) b | 28 (16) b | 20 (32) b | 18 | 16 | - |
|
| 7.90 | 26 (32) b | 24 (8) b | 23 (32) b | 19 (64) b | 12 | - |
|
| 3.40 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 5.29 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 5.07 | 18 (16) b | 22 (2) b | 15 | 12 | - | - |
|
| 5.77 | 12 | 12 | - | - | - | - |
|
| 4.70 | 14 | 17 | 12 | - | - | - |
|
| 4.41 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 4.03 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 5.14 | 22 (8) b | 27 (1) b | 19 (8) b | 13 | 11 | 11 |
|
| 4.79 | 19 (8) b | 25 (2) b | 18 (8) b | 12 | 12 | 13 |
|
| 26 (2) b | 25 (2) b | 18 (2) b | 20 (0.5) b | 19 (1) b | NT | |
|
| 23 (2) b | 21 (0.5) b | 19 (2) b | 17 (2) b | 16 (2) b | NT | |
|
| NT | NT | NT | NT | NT | 21 (2) b | |
a (-): Inactive (inhibition zone < 10 mm); (NT): Not tested; b The figures shown in parentheses represent the MIC values (μg/mL).
Oral hypoglycemic activity of compounds 5c, 6, 8b, 9, 14a, 15b (10 and 20 mg/kg) and gliclazide (10 mg/kg) in STZ-induced diabetic rats.
| Treatment | Results | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C0 (mg/dL) a | C24 (mg/dL) a | % Glucose Reduction b | |
|
| 302.6 ± 11.64 | 287.2 ± 16.85 | 5.09% |
|
| 295.4 ± 17.52 | 183.0 ± 13.38 * | 38.05% |
| 291.6 ± 15.23 | 189.0 ± 22.16 * | 35.19% (92.48) | |
| 319.6 ± 7.85 | 207.0 ± 13. 84 * | 35.23% (46.30) | |
| 283.8 ± 11.16 | 263.8 ± 16.66 | 7.05% (18.52) | |
| 296.6 ± 12.92 | 196.0 ± 9.67 * | 33.92% (44.58) | |
| 264.2 ± 5.49 | 257.4 ± 9.45 | 2.57% (6.75) | |
| 303.3 ± 16.35 | 291.2 ± 8.18 | 4.05% (5.32) | |
| 282.8 ± 13.90 | 275.8 ± 15.52 | 2.48% (6.52) | |
| 276.2 ± 14.17 | 264.6 ± 7.35 | 4.20% (5.52) | |
| 274.8 ± 14.59 | 277.4 ± 7.19 | 0.95% (2.50) | |
| 286.4 ± 24.56 | 271.4 ± 21.85 | 5.24% (6.89) | |
| 282.0 ± 14.21 | 287.8 ± 13.37 | −2.06% | |
| 293.2 ± 15.66 | 286.8 ± 17.16 | 2.18% (2.87) | |
a Results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 5); b The figures shown in parentheses are the relative potency compared with glicalzide; c Treated with a single oral dose of 0.5% (w/v) aqueous CMC solution (5 mL/kg); d Treated with 10 mg/kg gliclazide in 0.5% (w/v) aqueous CMC; * Significant difference at p < 0.01 compared with the corresponding control.