Literature DB >> 25942545

Immediate susceptibility to visual illusions after sight onset.

Tapan Gandhi1, Amy Kalia2, Suma Ganesh3, Pawan Sinha2.   

Abstract

The dominant accounts of many visual illusions are based on experience-driven development of sensitivity to certain visual cues. According to such accounts, learned associations between observed two-dimensional cues (say, converging lines) and the real three-dimensional structures they represent (a surface receding in depth) render us susceptible to misperceiving some images that are cleverly contrived to contain those two-dimensional cues. While this explanation appears reasonable, it lacks direct experimental validation. To contrast it with an account that dispenses with the need for visual experience, it is necessary to determine whether susceptibility to the illusion is present immediately after birth; however, eliciting reliable responses from newborns is fraught with operational difficulties, and studies with older infants are incapable of resolving this issue. Our work with children who gain sight after extended early-onset blindness, as part of Project Prakash, provides a potential way forward. We report here that the newly sighted children, ranging in age from 8 through 16 years, exhibit susceptibility to two well-known geometrical visual illusions, Ponzo [1] and Müller-Lyer [2], immediately after the onset of sight. This finding has implications not only for the likely explanations of these illusions, but more generally, for the nature-nurture argument as it relates to some key aspects of visual processing.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25942545      PMCID: PMC4863640          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  6 in total

1.  The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; A P Shimamura; M Mikolinski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-01

2.  DISTORTION OF VISUAL SPACE AS INAPPROPRIATE CONSTANCY SCALING.

Authors:  R L GREGORY
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships.

Authors:  Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The newly sighted fail to match seen with felt.

Authors:  Richard Held; Yuri Ostrovsky; Beatrice de Gelder; Beatrice deGelder; Tapan Gandhi; Suma Ganesh; Umang Mathur; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Diseases caused by impaired communication among cells.

Authors:  E Rubenstein
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.142

6.  Sight restoration.

Authors:  Pawan Sinha; Richard Held
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2012-09-05
  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Cross-Modal Plasticity in Higher-Order Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Cats Does Not Limit Auditory Responsiveness to Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Rüdiger Land; Peter Baumhoff; Jochen Tillein; Stephen G Lomber; Peter Hubka; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Functional outcomes following lesions in visual cortex: Implications for plasticity of high-level vision.

Authors:  Tina T Liu; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Saccone; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

5.  Distinct Contributions of Genes and Environment to Visual Size Illusion and the Underlying Neural Mechanism.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Qian Xu; Li Shen; Tian Yuan; Ying Wang; Wen Zhou; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Perceived depth modulates perceptual resolution.

Authors:  Tasfia Ahsan; Kathryn Bolton; Laurie M Wilcox; Erez Freud
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-28

7.  Mechanisms underlying simultaneous brightness contrast: Early and innate.

Authors:  Pawan Sinha; Sarah Crucilla; Tapan Gandhi; Dylan Rose; Amy Singh; Suma Ganesh; Umang Mathur; Peter Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Forms of prediction in the nervous system.

Authors:  Christoph Teufel; Paul C Fletcher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 9.  The Importance of the Interaction Between Ocular Motor Function and Vision During Human Infancy.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

10.  Multisensory perception in Argus II retinal prosthesis patients: Leveraging auditory-visual mappings to enhance prosthesis outcomes.

Authors:  Noelle R B Stiles; Vivek R Patel; James D Weiland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.