Literature DB >> 34379728

Distinct Contributions of Genes and Environment to Visual Size Illusion and the Underlying Neural Mechanism.

Lihong Chen1,2,3, Qian Xu3,4,5, Li Shen3,4,5, Tian Yuan3,4,5, Ying Wang3,4,5, Wen Zhou3,4,5, Yi Jiang3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

As exemplified by the Ebbinghaus illusion, the perceived size of an object can be significantly biased by its surrounding context. The phenomenon is experienced by humans as well as other species, hence likely evolutionarily adaptive. Here, we examined the heritability of the Ebbinghaus illusion using a combination of the classic twin method and multichannel functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results show that genes account for over 50% of the variance in the strength of the experienced illusion. Interestingly, activations evoked by the Ebbinghaus stimuli in the early visual cortex are explained by genetic factors whereas those in the posterior temporal cortex are explained by environmental factors. In parallel, the feedforward functional connectivity between the occipital cortex and the temporal cortex is modulated by genetic effects whereas the feedback functional connectivity is entirely shaped by environment, despite both being significantly correlated with the strength of the experienced illusion. These findings demonstrate that genetic and environmental factors work in tandem to shape the context-dependent visual size illusion, and shed new light on the links among genes, environment, brain, and subjective experience.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ebbinghaus illusion; behavioral genetics; fNIRS; functional connectivity; twin study

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34379728      PMCID: PMC8889949          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  61 in total

1.  Illusions, perception and Bayes.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The role of the primate extrastriate area V4 in vision.

Authors:  P H Schiller; K Lee
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-03-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Rescaling retinal size into perceived size: evidence for an occipital and parietal bottleneck.

Authors:  Sylvia Kreutzer; Ralph Weidner; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Developmental trends in susceptibility to perceptual illusions: Not all illusions are created equal.

Authors:  Bat Sheva Hadad
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Size constancy in monkeys with inferotemporal lesions.

Authors:  N K Humphrey; L Weiskrantz
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Heritable aspects of biological motion perception and its covariation with autistic traits.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Li Wang; Qian Xu; Dong Liu; Lihong Chen; Nikolaus F Troje; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Processing of the Müller-Lyer illusion by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus).

Authors:  Irene M Pepperberg; Jennifer Vicinay; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks.

Authors:  L Regolin; G Vallortigara
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-10

9.  Motion artifacts in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a comparison of motion correction techniques applied to real cognitive data.

Authors:  Sabrina Brigadoi; Lisa Ceccherini; Simone Cutini; Fabio Scarpa; Pietro Scatturin; Juliette Selb; Louis Gagnon; David A Boas; Robert J Cooper
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Blood oxygen level-dependent activation of the primary visual cortex predicts size adaptation illusion.

Authors:  Arezoo Pooresmaeili; Roberto Arrighi; Laura Biagi; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Number comparison under the Ebbinghaus illusion.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Chunhui Wang; Xiaoke Zhao; Shixin Deng; Yajun Zhao; Zhijun Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.