Literature DB >> 33607599

Multisensory perception in Argus II retinal prosthesis patients: Leveraging auditory-visual mappings to enhance prosthesis outcomes.

Noelle R B Stiles1, Vivek R Patel2, James D Weiland3.   

Abstract

Crossmodal mappings associate features (such as spatial location) between audition and vision, thereby aiding sensory binding and perceptual accuracy. Previously, it has been unclear whether patients with artificial vision will develop crossmodal mappings despite the low spatial and temporal resolution of their visual perception (particularly in light of the remodeling of the retina and visual cortex that takes place during decades of vision loss). To address this question, we studied crossmodal mappings psychophysically in Retinitis Pigmentosa patients with partial visual restoration by means of Argus II retinal prostheses, which incorporate an electrode array implanted on the retinal surface that stimulates still-viable ganglion cells with a video stream from a head-mounted camera. We found that Argus II patients (N = 10) exhibit significant crossmodal mappings between auditory location and visual location, and between auditory pitch and visual elevation, equivalent to those of age-matched sighted controls (N = 10). Furthermore, Argus II patients (N = 6) were able to use crossmodal mappings to locate a visual target more quickly with auditory cueing than without. Overall, restored artificial vision was shown to interact with audition via crossmodal mappings, which implies that the reorganization during blindness and the limitations of artificial vision did not prevent the relearning of crossmodal mappings. In particular, cueing based on crossmodal mappings was shown to improve visual search with a retinal prosthesis. This result represents a key first step toward leveraging crossmodal interactions for improved patient visual functionality.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory-visual integration; Crossmodal mappings; Retinal prostheses; Vision restoration and blindness

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33607599      PMCID: PMC7987772          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  59 in total

1.  Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants.

Authors:  D S Lee; J S Lee; S H Oh; S K Kim; J W Kim; J K Chung; M C Lee; C S Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Philip T Quinlan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Pascale Sandmann; Norbert Dillier; Tom Eichele; Martin Meyer; Andrea Kegel; Roberto Domingo Pascual-Marqui; Valentine Leslie Marcar; Lutz Jäncke; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Fighting blindness with microelectronics.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  The newly sighted fail to match seen with felt.

Authors:  Richard Held; Yuri Ostrovsky; Beatrice de Gelder; Beatrice deGelder; Tapan Gandhi; Suma Ganesh; Umang Mathur; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time.

Authors:  I H Bernstein; B A Edelstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-02

7.  Visually Impaired Users can Locate and Grasp Objects Under the Guidance of Computer Vision and Non-Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Nii Mante; James D Weiland
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2018-07

8.  Feasibility of Structural and Functional MRI Acquisition with Unpowered Implants in Argus II Retinal Prosthesis Patients: A Case Study.

Authors:  Samantha I Cunningham; Yonggang Shi; James D Weiland; Paulo Falabella; Lisa C Olmos de Koo; David N Zacks; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Audio motor training improves mobility and spatial cognition in visually impaired children.

Authors:  Giulia Cappagli; Sara Finocchietti; Elena Cocchi; Giuseppina Giammari; Roberta Zumiani; Anna Vera Cuppone; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Monica Gori
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users.

Authors:  Cordelia Erickson-Davis; Helma Korzybska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

2.  Visual-tactile shape perception in the visually restored with artificial vision.

Authors:  Noelle R B Stiles; James D Weiland; Vivek R Patel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Altered Regional Homogeneity in Patients With Congenital Blindness: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Jiong-Jiong Hu; Nan Jiang; Jun Chen; Ping Ying; Ming Kang; San-Hua Xu; Jie Zou; Hong Wei; Qian Ling; Yi Shao
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 4.  Retinal Organoids and Retinal Prostheses: An Overview.

Authors:  Alessandro Bellapianta; Ana Cetkovic; Matthias Bolz; Ahmad Salti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.