Literature DB >> 34585320

Perceived depth modulates perceptual resolution.

Tasfia Ahsan1,2, Kathryn Bolton1, Laurie M Wilcox1,2, Erez Freud3,4.   

Abstract

Humans constantly use depth information to support perceptual decisions about object size and location in space, as well as planning and executing actions. It was recently reported that perceived depth modulates perceptual performance even when depth information is not relevant to the task, with faster shape discrimination for objects perceived as being close to the observer. However, it is yet to be determined if the observed "close advantage" reflects differences in psychophysical sensitivity or response bias. Moreover, it is unclear whether this advantage is generalizable to other viewing situations and tasks. To address these outstanding issues, we evaluated whether visual resolution is modulated by perceived depth defined by 2D pictorial cues. In a series of experiments, we used the method of constant stimuli to measure the precision of perceptual judgements for stimuli positioned at close, far, and flat perceived distances. In Experiment 1, we found that size discrimination was more precise when the object was perceived to be closer to the observers. Experiments 2a and 2b extended this finding to a visual property orthogonal to depth information, by showing superior orientation discrimination for "close" objects. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that the close advantage also occurs when performing high-level perceptual tasks such as face perception. Taken together, our results provide novel evidence that the perceived depth of an object, as defined by pictorial cues, modulates the precision of visual processing for close objects.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Close advantage; Constant stimuli; Depth perception; JND; Object recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34585320     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-02006-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  27 in total

1.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action.

Authors:  S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Ettore Ambrosini; Gaetano Tieri; Corrado Sinigaglia; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space.

Authors:  André Dufour; Pascale Touzalin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand.

Authors:  F Frassinetti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Peripersonal space in the brain.

Authors:  Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Elisabetta Làdavas
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Faster recognition of graspable targets defined by orientation in a visual search task.

Authors:  Lindsay E Bamford; Nikola R Klassen; Jenni M Karl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Altered vision near the hands.

Authors:  Richard A Abrams; Christopher C Davoli; Feng Du; William H Knapp; Daniel Paull
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-10-30

8.  Detecting Superior Face Recognition Skills in a Large Sample of Young British Adults.

Authors:  Anna K Bobak; Philip Pampoulov; Sarah Bate
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-22

9.  Mind the Depth: Visual Perception of Shapes Is Better in Peripersonal Space.

Authors:  Elvio Blini; Clément Desoche; Romeo Salemme; Alexandre Kabil; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.