Literature DB >> 15657142

The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships.

Catherine Q Howe1, Dale Purves.   

Abstract

The Müller-Lyer effect, the apparent difference in the length of a line as the result of its adornment with arrowheads or arrow tails, is the best known and most controversial of the classical geometrical illusions. By sampling a range-image database of natural scenes, we show that the perceptual effects elicited by the Müller-Lyer stimulus and its major variants are correctly predicted by the probability distributions of the possible physical sources underlying the relevant retinal images. These results support the conclusion that the Müller-Lyer illusion is a manifestation of the probabilistic strategy of visual processing that has evolved to contend with the uncertain provenance of retinal stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15657142      PMCID: PMC544622          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0409314102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length.

Authors:  Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DISTORTION OF VISUAL SPACE AS INAPPROPRIATE CONSTANCY SCALING.

Authors:  R L GREGORY
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Size contrast and assimilation explained by the statistics of natural scene geometry.

Authors:  Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation.

Authors:  Catherine Q Howe; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The tilt-constancy theory of visual illusions.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; D M Beck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Perceptual illusions and brain models.

Authors:  R L Gregory
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1968-12-31

7.  Visual spatial illusions: a general explanation.

Authors:  R H Day
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Explanation of the Müller-Lyer illusion: confusion theory examined.

Authors:  A Erlebacher; R Sekuler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-06

9.  A theory of the Mueller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  A W Pressey
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-10

10.  A study of the effect of perfect retinal stabilization of some well-known visual illusions, using the after-image as a method of compensating for eye movements.

Authors:  C R Evans; R P Marsden
Journal:  Br J Physiol Opt       Date:  1966
View more
  22 in total

1.  Relative luminance and binocular disparity preferences are correlated in macaque primary visual cortex, matching natural scene statistics.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Brian R Potetz; Tai Sing Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural activity at the human olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception.

Authors:  Hadas Lapid; Sagit Shushan; Anton Plotkin; Hillary Voet; Yehudah Roth; Thomas Hummel; Elad Schneidman; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Temporal processing characteristics of the Ponzo illusion.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-13

4.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

5.  Immediate susceptibility to visual illusions after sight onset.

Authors:  Tapan Gandhi; Amy Kalia; Suma Ganesh; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A new illusion of height and width: taller people are perceived as thinner.

Authors:  Diane M Beck; Barbara Emanuele; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  Global processing during the Müller-Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; William A Noulty; Irene Sperandio; Oriane Landry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dynamic perceptive compensation for the rotating snakes illusion with eye tracking.

Authors:  Yuki Kubota; Tomohiko Hayakawa; Masatoshi Ishikawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Müller-Lyer Illusion in a computational model of biological object recognition.

Authors:  Astrid Zeman; Oliver Obst; Kevin R Brooks; Anina N Rich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.