Literature DB >> 25925494

Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.

Sven Knecht1, Tobias Reichlin, Nikola Pavlovic, Beat Schaer, Stefan Osswald, Christian Sticherling, Michael Kühne.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contact force (CF) sensing during radiofrequency (RF) ablation allows controlling lesion size. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of catheter tip location and orientation on the association of CF and impedance decrease.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed RF applications from 32 patients undergoing catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using a force-sensing catheter and 3D mapping system. CF, catheter location and orientation relative to the tissue during ablation as well as the absolute impedance decrease during the first 20 s of ablation as a surrogate for lesion effectiveness were analyzed for 791 RF applications.
RESULTS: While a higher CF was achieved around the right pulmonary veins (12.5 vs. 11.4 g, p = 0.045), a lower median absolute impedance decrease within the first 20 s was seen around the right veins compared to the left veins (9.3 vs. 10.2 Ω, p = 0.02). With different catheter orientations relative to the tissue, higher CF and impedance decrease was seen when the catheter was orientated parallel or oblique to the tissue (30°-145°) as compared perpendicularly (0-30°) with a median CF of 13.2 vs. 8.0 g (p < 0.001) and a median impedance decrease during the first 20 s of 11 vs. 7 Ω (p < 0.001). Importantly, achieved CF, baseline impedance, catheter orientation and location all independently predicted the initial absolute and relative impedance decrease in a multivariable linear regression model (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of RF ablation lesions, as assessed by the initial impedance decrease, is not only dependent on the achieved catheter CF but also on catheter orientation and location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25925494     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-015-0002-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  21 in total

1.  Area under the real-time contact force curve (force-time integral) predicts radiofrequency lesion size in an in vitro contractile model.

Authors:  Dipen C Shah; Hendrik Lambert; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Arne Langenkamp; Nicolas Aeby; Giovanni Leo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09

2.  Local unipolar and bipolar electrogram criteria for evaluating the transmurality of atrial ablation lesions at different catheter orientations relative to the endocardial surface.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Otomo; Kikuya Uno; Hideomi Fujiwara; Mitsuaki Isobe; Yoshito Iesaka
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Ablation effect indicated by impedance fall is correlated with contact force level during ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alessandro De Bortoli; Li-Zhi Sun; Eivind Solheim; Per Ivar Hoff; Peter Schuster; Ole-Jørgen Ohm; Jian Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-19

4.  Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.

Authors:  Tobias Reichlin; Sven Knecht; Christopher Lane; Michael Kühne; Eyal Nof; Nagesh Chopra; Thomas M Tadros; Vivek Y Reddy; Beat Schaer; Roy M John; Stefan Osswald; William G Stevenson; Christian Sticherling; Gregory F Michaud
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Dipen Shah; Josef Kautzner; Boris Schmidt; Nadir Saoudi; Claudia Herrera; Pierre Jaïs; Gerhard Hindricks; Petr Peichl; Aude Yulzari; Hendrik Lambert; Petr Neuzil; Andrea Natale; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Endocardial impedance mapping during circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation differentiates between atrial and venous tissue.

Authors:  Christopher C E Lang; Filippo Gugliotta; Vincenzo Santinelli; Cézar Mesas; Takeshi Tomita; Gabriele Vicedomini; Giuseppe Augello; Simone Gulletta; Patrizio Mazzone; Francesco De Cobelli; Alessandro Del Maschio; Carlo Pappone
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Unipolar signal modification as a guide for lesion creation during radiofrequency application in the left atrium: prospective study in humans in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

Authors:  Agustín Bortone; Anthony Appetiti; Abdeslam Bouzeman; Eric Maupas; Vlad Ciobotaru; Jean-Marc Boulenc; Pénélope Pujadas-Berthault; Philippe Rioux
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-10-04

8.  Predictive value of impedance changes for real-time contact force measurements during catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in humans.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; H M Haqqani; Martin Chan; Justin Lee; Matias Yudi; Michael C G Wong; Joseph B Morton; Liang-Han Ling; Timothy Robinson; Patrick M Heck; Nicholas F Kelland; Karen Halloran; Steven J Spence; Peter M Kistler; Jonathan M Kalman
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study.

Authors:  Shouvik Haldar; Julian W E Jarman; Sandeep Panikker; David G Jones; Tushar Salukhe; Dhiraj Gupta; Gareth Wynn; Wajid Hussain; Vias Markides; Tom Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Catheter-tissue contact force for pulmonary veins isolation: a pilot multicentre study on effect on procedure and fluoroscopy time.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Francesco Solimene; Leonardo Calò; Matteo Anselmino; Antonello Castro; Claudio Pratola; Paolo Golia; Nicola Bottoni; Giuseppe Grandinetti; Antonio De Simone; Roberto De Ponti; Serena Dottori; Emanuele Bertaglia
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  4 in total

1.  Radiofrequency ablation data associated with atrioesophageal fistula.

Authors:  David R Tomlinson; John Mandrola
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 2.  Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of the Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Daniel P Melby
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  Regional differences in the predictors of acute electrical reconnection following high-power pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kyoichiro Yazaki; Koichiro Ejima; Shohei Kataoka; Miwa Kanai; Satoshi Higuchi; Daigo Yagishita; Morio Shoda; Nobuhisa Hagiwara
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-07-23

4.  Impact of impedance decrease during radiofrequency current application for atrial fibrillation ablation on myocardial lesion and gap formation.

Authors:  Osamu Inaba; Yasutoshi Nagata; Masahiro Sekigawa; Naoyuki Miwa; Junji Yamaguchi; Takamichi Miyamoto; Masahiko Goya; Kenzo Hirao
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-04-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.