Literature DB >> 24177370

Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters.

Tobias Reichlin1, Sven Knecht2, Christopher Lane3, Michael Kühne2, Eyal Nof4, Nagesh Chopra3, Thomas M Tadros3, Vivek Y Reddy5, Beat Schaer2, Roy M John3, Stefan Osswald2, William G Stevenson3, Christian Sticherling2, Gregory F Michaud3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good catheter-tissue contact force (CF) is critical for transmural and durable lesion formation during radiofrequency (RF) ablation but is difficult to assess in clinical practice. Tissue heating during RF application results in an impedance decrease at the catheter tip.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to correlate achieved CF and initial impedance decreases during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.
METHODS: We correlated achieved CF and initial impedance decreases in patients undergoing ablation for AF with two novel open-irrigated CF-sensing RF catheters (Biosense Webster SmartTouch, n = 647 RF applications; and Endosense TactiCath, n = 637 RF applications). We then compared those impedance decreases to 691 RF applications with a standard open-irrigated RF catheter (Biosense Webster ThermoCool).
RESULTS: When RF applications with the CF-sensing catheters were analyzed according to an achieved average CF <5 g, 5-10 g, 10-20 g, and >20 g, the initial impedance decreases during ablation were larger with greater CF. Corresponding median values at 20 seconds were 5 Ω (interquartile range [IQR] 2-7), 8 Ω (4-11), 10 Ω (7-16), and 14 Ω (10-19) with the SmartTouch and n/a, 4 Ω (0-10), 8 Ω (5-12), and 13 Ω (8-18) with the TactiCath (P <.001 between categories for both catheters). When RF applications with the SmartTouch (CF-sensing catheter, median achieved CF 12 g) and ThermoCool (standard catheter) were compared, the initial impedance decrease was significantly greater in the CF-sensing group with median decreases of 10 Ω (6-14 Ω) vs 5 Ω (2-10 Ω) at 20 seconds (P <.001 between catheters).
CONCLUSION: The initial impedance decrease during RF applications in AF ablations is larger when greater catheter contact is achieved. Monitoring of the initial impedance decrease is a widely available indicator of catheter contact and may help to improve formation of durable ablation lesions.
© 2013 Heart Rhythm Society Published by Heart Rhythm Society All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AF; Atrial fibrillation ablation; CF; Contact force sensing catheter; EGM; IQR; Impedance decrease; PV; PVI; RF; atrial fibrillation; contact force; electrogram; interquartile range; pulmonary vein; pulmonary vein isolation; radiofrequency

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24177370     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  25 in total

1.  THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® CATHETER - The Evidence So Far for Contact Force Technology and the Role of VISITAG™ MODULE.

Authors:  Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Tilz
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30

Review 2.  What Is the Appropriate Lesion Set for Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Jorge Romero; Carola Gianni; Andrea Natale; Luigi Di Biase
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05

3.  Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.

Authors:  Sven Knecht; Tobias Reichlin; Nikola Pavlovic; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling; Michael Kühne
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Left atrial anterior line ablation using ablation index and inter-lesion distance measurement.

Authors:  Francesco Santoro; Andreas Metzner; Natale Daniele Brunetti; Christian-H Heeger; Shibu Mathew; Bruno Reissmann; Christine Lemeš; Tilman Maurer; Thomas Fink; Laura Rottner; Osamu Inaba; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Feifan Ouyang; Andreas Rillig
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Benefit of Contact Force-Guided Catheter Ablation for Treating Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Authors:  Ziming Zhao; Xiaowei Liu; Lianjun Gao; Yutao Xi; Qi Chen; Dong Chang; Xianjie Xiao; Jie Cheng; Yanzong Yang; Yunlong Xia; Xiaomeng Yin
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2020-02-01

6.  Impact of anteroinferior transseptal puncture on creation of a complete block at the mitral isthmus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kenji Okubo; Taishi Kuwahara; Masateru Takigawa; Yasuaki Tanaka; Jun Nakajima; Yuji Watari; Emiko Nakashima; Kazuya Yamao; Yuichiro Sagawa; Katsumasa Takagi; Tadashi Fujino; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Atsushi Takahashi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Biophysical parameters during radiofrequency catheter ablation of scar-mediated ventricular tachycardia: epicardial and endocardial applications via manual and magnetic navigation.

Authors:  Tara Bourke; Eric Buch; Nilesh Mathuria; Yoav Michowitz; Ricky Yu; Ravi Mandapati; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Roderick Tung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-24

Review 8.  How To Achieve Durable Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation?

Authors:  Y Darrat; G Morales; Biase L Di; A Natale; C S Elayi
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-04-30

Review 9.  Better Lesion Creation And Assessment During Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Samuel Balindger; Roy M John; Laurence M Epstein; Bruce A Koplan; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

Review 10.  The Role Of Contact Force In Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Nakagawa; Warren M Jackman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.