Literature DB >> 16443532

Endocardial impedance mapping during circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation differentiates between atrial and venous tissue.

Christopher C E Lang1, Filippo Gugliotta, Vincenzo Santinelli, Cézar Mesas, Takeshi Tomita, Gabriele Vicedomini, Giuseppe Augello, Simone Gulletta, Patrizio Mazzone, Francesco De Cobelli, Alessandro Del Maschio, Carlo Pappone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation (CPVA) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Accurate left atrial (LA) mapping is essential for creating lesions at the LA-pulmonary vein (PV) junction, avoiding PV stenosis.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish whether endocardial impedance varies within the LA and PVs and whether it is a useful tool for mapping and ablation.
METHODS: Pilot Phase: Three-dimensional LA maps were created using CARTO. Impedance (Z) was measured using a radiofrequency generator at multiple points in the LA, PV ostia (PVO), and deep PVs in 79 patients undergoing their first AF ablation (group 1) and 29 patients undergoing repeat CPVA (group 2). Prospective Phase: In an additional 20 patients, using pilot phase data, one operator defined catheter tip location as either LA or PVO based on CARTO and fluoroscopy. A second operator blinded to CARTO simultaneously did the same based on impedance at 15 +/- 4 points per patient.
RESULTS: Group 1: Z(LA) was 99.4 +/- 9.0 omega. Z(PVO) was higher (109.2 +/- 8.5 omega), rising further as the catheter advanced into deep PV (137 omega +/- 18). Z(PVO) differed from Z(LA) by 9 +/- 4 omega. Group 2 had a lower Z(LA) and Z(PVO) compared with group 1 (P <.05). Impedance monitoring differentiated between LA and PVO, with 91% specificity and sensitivity, 96% positive predictive value, and 81% negative predictive value. At 3-month follow-up, no patients had evidence of PV stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging.
CONCLUSION: Impedance mapping reliably identifies the LA-PV transitional zone, facilitating AF ablation, and its use is associated with a low incidence of PV stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16443532     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  3 in total

1.  Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.

Authors:  Sven Knecht; Tobias Reichlin; Nikola Pavlovic; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling; Michael Kühne
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  No severe pulmonary vein stenosis after extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation: 12-month follow-up with 3D computed tomography.

Authors:  Shingo Maeda; Yoshito Iesaka; Kiyoshi Otomo; Kikuya Uno; Yasutoshi Nagata; Kenji Suzuki; Hitoshi Hachiya; Masahiko Goya; Atsushi Takahashi; Hideomi Fujiwara; Mitsuaki Isobe
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  The State of the Art in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis -Diagnosis & Treatment.

Authors:  Lourdes R Prieto
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2010-01-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.