Literature DB >> 23865557

Ablation effect indicated by impedance fall is correlated with contact force level during ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Alessandro De Bortoli1, Li-Zhi Sun, Eivind Solheim, Per Ivar Hoff, Peter Schuster, Ole-Jørgen Ohm, Jian Chen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have validated the use of impedance fall as a measure of the effects of ablation. We investigated whether catheter-to-tissue contact force correlated with impedance fall during atrial fibrillation ablation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 394 ablation points from 35 patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation were selected and analyzed in terms of the presence of stable catheter contact in non-ablated areas in the left atrium. A fixed power output (30 W) was applied for 60 seconds. Contact force, impedance fall, and force-direction angle were retrieved and exported for off-line analysis. Qualified points were divided into 5 groups according to the level of contact force (1-5 g, 6-10 g, 11-15 g, 16-20 g, and >20 g). An acute impedance fall was observed in the first 10 seconds followed by a plateau in group I and by a further fall in the other groups. Group V showed a rise in impedance during the last 20 seconds of ablation. Levels of impedance fall at each time point were significantly different among all the groups (P<0.001) except between groups III and IV. There was a significant correlation between contact force and maximum impedance fall (rho = 0.54, P<0.01). Lesions with a force-direction angle of 0-30° had significantly lower contact force and maximum impedance fall than those with angles of 30-60° and 60-135° (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Under stable catheter conditions, contact force correlates with impedance fall during 60 seconds of ablation. Contact force exceeding 5 g produces greater impedance fall, which probably indicates adequate lesion formation. A contact force greater than 20 g may lead to late tissue overheating.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; contact force; impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23865557     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  8 in total

1.  Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter.

Authors:  Sven Knecht; Tobias Reichlin; Nikola Pavlovic; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling; Michael Kühne
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Radiation Dose is Significantly Reduced by Use of Contact Force Sensing Catheter During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio De Simone; Francesco Solimene; Assunta Iuliano; Vincenzo La Rocca; Vincenzo Schillaci; Alfonso Panella; Gergana Shopova; Felice Nappi; Francesco Urraro; Giovanni Russo; Giovanni Napolitano; Paola Chiariello
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Relationship between left atrium catheter contact force and pacing threshold.

Authors:  Teresa Barrio-López; Mercedes Ortiz; Eduardo Castellanos; Carla Lázaro; Jefferson Salas; Sergio Madero; Jesús Almendral
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Better Lesion Creation And Assessment During Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Saurabh Kumar; Chirag R Barbhaiya; Samuel Balindger; Roy M John; Laurence M Epstein; Bruce A Koplan; Usha B Tedrow; William G Stevenson; Gregory F Michaud
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

Review 5.  Impact of Contact Force Technology on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Shurrab; Luigi Di Biase; David F Briceno; Anna Kaoutskaia; Saleem Haj-Yahia; David Newman; Ilan Lashevsky; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Eugene Crystal
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  First evidence of clinical benefit of robotically driven catheter ablation or an outlayer?

Authors:  Jesús Almendral
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 7.  Impedance-guided Radiofrequency Ablation: Using Impedance to Improve Ablation Outcomes.

Authors:  Jason S Chinitz; Gregory F Michaud; Kent Stephenson
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-10-15

8.  The impacts of contact force, power and application time on ablation effect indicated by serial measurements of impedance drop in both conventional and high-power short-duration ablation settings of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Li-Bin Shi; Yu-Chuan Wang; Song-Yun Chu; Alessandro De Bortoli; Peter Schuster; Eivind Solheim; Jian Chen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.