Literature DB >> 25920851

Measuring the effects of spectral smearing and enhancement on speech recognition in noise for adults and children.

Susan Nittrouer1, Eric Tarr1, Taylor Wucinich1, Aaron C Moberly1, Joanna H Lowenstein1.   

Abstract

Broadened auditory filters associated with sensorineural hearing loss have clearly been shown to diminish speech recognition in noise for adults, but far less is known about potential effects for children. This study examined speech recognition in noise for adults and children using simulated auditory filters of different widths. Specifically, 5 groups (20 listeners each) of adults or children (5 and 7 yrs), were asked to recognize sentences in speech-shaped noise. Seven-year-olds listened at 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) only; 5-yr-olds listened at +3 or 0 dB SNR; and adults listened at 0 or -3 dB SNR. Sentence materials were processed both to smear the speech spectrum (i.e., simulate broadened filters), and to enhance the spectrum (i.e., simulate narrowed filters). Results showed: (1) Spectral smearing diminished recognition for listeners of all ages; (2) spectral enhancement did not improve recognition, and in fact diminished it somewhat; and (3) interactions were observed between smearing and SNR, but only for adults. That interaction made age effects difficult to gauge. Nonetheless, it was concluded that efforts to diagnose the extent of broadening of auditory filters and to develop techniques to correct this condition could benefit patients with hearing loss, especially children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25920851      PMCID: PMC4417020          DOI: 10.1121/1.4916203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.

Authors:  L S Eisenberg; R V Shannon; A S Martinez; J Wygonski; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The influence of phonemic awareness development on acoustic cue weighting strategies in children's speech perception.

Authors:  Catherine Mayo; James M Scobbie; Nigel Hewlett; Daphne Waters
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Dynamic spectral structure specifies vowels for adults and children.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing.

Authors:  M P Moeller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  P G Stelmachowicz; B M Hoover; D E Lewis; R W Kortekaas; A L Pittman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  M R Leek; M F Dorman; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Novel-word learning in children with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia G Stelmachowicz; Andrea L Pittman; Brenda M Hoover; Dawna E Lewis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  5 in total

1.  Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  David L Horn; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effect of Increased Daily Cochlear Implant Use on Auditory Perception in Adults.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.674

Review 3.  Lipreading: A Review of Its Continuing Importance for Speech Recognition With an Acquired Hearing Loss and Possibilities for Effective Training.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Nicole Jordan; Edward T Auer; Silvio P Eberhardt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Speech Recognition in Noise by Children with and without Dyslexia: How is it Related to Reading?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Letitia M Krieg; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2018-05-01

5.  Substitution Patterns of Phoneme Errors in Hearing Aid and Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Woojae Han; Hyungi Chun; Gibbeum Kim; In-Ki Jin
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2017-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.