Literature DB >> 3819173

Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

M R Leek, M F Dorman, Q Summerfield.   

Abstract

To determine the minimum difference in amplitude between spectral peaks and troughs sufficient for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, four vowel-like complex sounds were created by summing the first 30 harmonics of a 100-Hz tone. The amplitudes of all harmonics were equal, except for two consecutive harmonics located at each of three "formant" locations. The amplitudes of these harmonics were equal and ranged from 1-8 dB more than the remaining components. Normal-hearing listeners achieved greater than 75% accuracy when peak-to-trough differences were 1-2 dB. Normal-hearing listeners who were tested in a noise background sufficient to raise their thresholds to the level of a flat, moderate hearing loss needed a 4-dB difference for identification. Listeners with a moderate, flat hearing loss required a 6- to 7-dB difference for identification. The results suggest, for normal-hearing listeners, that the peak-to-trough amplitude difference required for identification of this set of vowels is very near the threshold for detection of a change in the amplitude spectrum of a complex signal. Hearing-impaired listeners may have difficulty using closely spaced formants for vowel identification due to abnormal smoothing of the internal representation of the spectrum by broadened auditory filters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3819173     DOI: 10.1121/1.395024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Comparing similar spectra: from similarity index to spectral contrast angle.

Authors:  Katty X Wan; Ilan Vidavsky; Michael L Gross
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Spectral processing of two concurrent harmonic complexes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

4.  Effects of spectral modulation filtering on vowel identification.

Authors:  Chang Liu; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectrotemporal processing differences between auditory cortical fast-spiking and regular-spiking neurons.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Learning to perceptually organize speech signals in native fashion.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Impacts of age on memory for auditory intensity.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Anna C Diedesch; Robertson Beasley
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of complete and incomplete formant transitions in vowels.

Authors:  Pierre Divenyi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reliability and Repeatability of the Speech Cue Profile.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun; Paul Reinhart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Multichannel compression: effects of reduced spectral contrast on vowel identification.

Authors:  Stephanie Bor; Pamela Souza; Richard Wright
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.