Literature DB >> 11386477

The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.

P G Stelmachowicz1, B M Hoover, D E Lewis, R W Kortekaas, A L Pittman.   

Abstract

In this study, the influence of stimulus context and audibility on sentence recognition was assessed in 60 normal-hearing children, 23 hearing-impaired children, and 20 normal-hearing adults. Performance-intensity (PI) functions were obtained for 60 semantically correct and 60 semantically anomalous sentences. For each participant, an audibility index (AI) was calculated at each presentation level, and a logistic function was fitted to rau-transformed percent-correct values to estimate the SPL and AI required to achieve 70% performance. For both types of sentences, there was a systematic age-related shift in the PI functions, suggesting that young children require a higher AI to achieve performance equivalent to that of adults. Improvement in performance with the addition of semantic context was statistically significant only for the normal-hearing 5-year-olds and adults. Data from the hearing-impaired children showed age-related trends that were similar to those of the normal-hearing children, with the majority of individual data falling within the 5th and 95th percentile of normal. The implications of these findings in terms of hearing-aid fitting strategies for young children are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11386477     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4304.902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  26 in total

Review 1.  How we do it: employment of listening-development criteria during assessment of infants who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  Brittan A Barker; Maura H Kenworthy; Elizabeth A Walker
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-02

2.  Low-frequency signals support perceptual organization of implant-simulated speech for adults and children.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Eric Tarr; Virginia Bolster; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr; Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Deaf children with cochlear implants do not appear to use sentence context to help recognize spoken words.

Authors:  Christopher M Conway; Joanne A Deocampo; Anne M Walk; Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Vocabulary Facilitates Speech Perception in Children With Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Kelsey E Klein; Elizabeth A Walker; Benjamin Kirby; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Julie Case; Scott Seyfarth; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  The Use of Frequency Lowering Technology in the Treatment of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss: A Review of the Literature and Candidacy Considerations for Clinical Application.

Authors:  Danielle Glista; Susan Scollie
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Short-term implicit voice-learning leads to a Familiar Talker Advantage: The role of encoding specificity.

Authors:  Julie Case; Scott Seyfarth; Susannah V Levi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Individual differences in language and working memory affect children's speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Meredith Spratford; Benjamin Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.