Literature DB >> 25908967

Predicting mouse vertebra strength with micro-computed tomography-derived finite element analysis.

Jeffry S Nyman1, Sasidhar Uppuganti2, Alexander J Makowski3, Barbara J Rowland4, Alyssa R Merkel5, Julie A Sterling6, Todd L Bredbenner7, Daniel S Perrien8.   

Abstract

As in clinical studies, finite element analysis (FEA) developed from computed tomography (CT) images of bones are useful in pre-clinical rodent studies assessing treatment effects on vertebral body (VB) strength. Since strength predictions from microCT-derived FEAs (μFEA) have not been validated against experimental measurements of mouse VB strength, a parametric analysis exploring material and failure definitions was performed to determine whether elastic μFEAs with linear failure criteria could reasonably assess VB strength in two studies, treatment and genetic, with differences in bone volume fraction between the control and the experimental groups. VBs were scanned with a 12-μm voxel size, and voxels were directly converted to 8-node, hexahedral elements. The coefficient of determination or R (2) between predicted VB strength and experimental VB strength, as determined from compression tests, was 62.3% for the treatment study and 85.3% for the genetic study when using a homogenous tissue modulus (E t) of 18 GPa for all elements, a failure volume of 2%, and an equivalent failure strain of 0.007. The difference between prediction and measurement (that is, error) increased when lowering the failure volume to 0.1% or increasing it to 4%. Using inhomogeneous tissue density-specific moduli improved the R (2) between predicted and experimental strength when compared with uniform E t=18 GPa. Also, the optimum failure volume is higher for the inhomogeneous than for the homogeneous material definition. Regardless of model assumptions, μFEA can assess differences in murine VB strength between experimental groups when the expected difference in strength is at least 20%.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908967      PMCID: PMC4407510          DOI: 10.1038/bonekey.2015.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bonekey Rep        ISSN: 2047-6396


  57 in total

1.  Increased bone strength is associated with improved bone microarchitecture in intact female rats treated with strontium ranelate: a finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Steven K Boyd; Eva Szabo; Patrick Ammann
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  The influence of material property and morphological parameters on specimen-specific finite element models of porcine vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Biomechanical effect of mineral heterogeneity in trabecular bone.

Authors:  G A P Renders; L Mulder; G E J Langenbach; L J van Ruijven; T M G J van Eijden
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Deriving tissue density and elastic modulus from microCT bone scans.

Authors:  David W Wagner; Derek P Lindsey; Gary S Beaupre
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.

Authors:  J H Keyak; S A Rossi; K A Jones; H B Skinner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA.

Authors:  E Dall'Ara; D Pahr; P Varga; F Kainberger; P Zysset
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models.

Authors:  B van Rietbergen; H Weinans; R Huiskes; A Odgaard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Valid micro finite element models of vertebral trabecular bone can be obtained using tissue properties measured with nanoindentation under wet conditions.

Authors:  Uwe Wolfram; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Finite element analysis performed on radius and tibia HR-pQCT images and fragility fractures at all sites in men.

Authors:  Nicolas Vilayphiou; Stephanie Boutroy; Pawel Szulc; Bert van Rietbergen; Francoise Munoz; Pierre D Delmas; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Contribution of the intra-specimen variations in tissue mineralization to PTH- and raloxifene-induced changes in stiffness of rat vertebrae.

Authors:  Sarah K Easley; Michael G Jekir; Andrew J Burghardt; Mei Li; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  9 in total

1.  A novel technique with reduced computed tomography exposure to predict vertebral compression fracture: a finite element study based on rat vertebrae.

Authors:  Giovanni F Solitro; Florian Mainnemare; Farid Amirouche; Ankit Mehta
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Finite element analysis of bone strength in osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Peter Varga; Bettina M Willie; Chris Stephan; Kenneth M Kozloff; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Age-related changes in the fracture resistance of male Fischer F344 rat bone.

Authors:  Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Alexander J Makowski; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Fibrinolysis is essential for fracture repair and prevention of heterotopic ossification.

Authors:  Masato Yuasa; Nicholas A Mignemi; Jeffry S Nyman; Craig L Duvall; Herbert S Schwartz; Atsushi Okawa; Toshitaka Yoshii; Gourab Bhattacharjee; Chenguang Zhao; Jesse E Bible; William T Obremskey; Matthew J Flick; Jay L Degen; Joey V Barnett; Justin M M Cates; Jonathan G Schoenecker
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The BALB/c mouse as a preclinical model of the age-related deterioration in the lumbar vertebra.

Authors:  Dominique Harris; Kate Garrett; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Amy Creecy; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Combined treatment with a transforming growth factor beta inhibitor (1D11) and bortezomib improves bone architecture in a mouse model of myeloma-induced bone disease.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Alyssa R Merkel; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Bijaya Nayak; Barbara Rowland; Alexander J Makowski; Babatunde O Oyajobi; Julie A Sterling
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  In Vivo 3D Histomorphometry Quantifies Bone Apposition and Skeletal Progenitor Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  Shu-Chi A Yeh; Katarzyna Wilk; Charles P Lin; Giuseppe Intini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Non-invasive prediction of the mouse tibia mechanical properties from microCT images: comparison between different finite element models.

Authors:  S Oliviero; M Roberts; R Owen; G C Reilly; I Bellantuono; E Dall'Ara
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-02-01

9.  Ciliary parathyroid hormone signaling activates transforming growth factor-β to maintain intervertebral disc homeostasis during aging.

Authors:  Liwei Zheng; Yong Cao; Shuangfei Ni; Huabin Qi; Zemin Ling; Xin Xu; Xuenong Zou; Tianding Wu; Ruoxian Deng; Bo Hu; Bo Gao; Hao Chen; Yusheng Li; Jianxi Zhu; Francis Tintani; Shadpour Demehri; Amit Jain; Khaled M Kebaish; Shenghui Liao; Cheryle A Séguin; Janet L Crane; Mei Wan; Hongbin Lu; Paul D Sponseller; Lee H Riley; Xuedong Zhou; Jianzhong Hu; Xu Cao
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 13.567

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.