Literature DB >> 21541999

Finite element analysis performed on radius and tibia HR-pQCT images and fragility fractures at all sites in men.

Nicolas Vilayphiou1, Stephanie Boutroy, Pawel Szulc, Bert van Rietbergen, Francoise Munoz, Pierre D Delmas, Roland Chapurlat.   

Abstract

Few studies have investigated bone microarchitecture and biomechanical properties in men. This study assessed in vivo both aspects in a population of 185 men (aged 71 ± 10 years) with prevalent fragility fractures, compared to 185 controls matched for age, height, and weight, from the Structure of the Aging Men's Bones (STRAMBO) cohort. In this case-control study, areal BMD (aBMD) was measured by DXA, bone microarchitecture was assessed by high resolution (HR)-pQCT, and finite element (µFE) analysis was based on HR-pQCT images of distal radius and tibia. A principal component (PC) analysis (PCA) was used to study the association of synthetic PCs with fracture by computing their odds ratio (OR [95%CI]) per SD change. Specific associations with vertebral fracture (n = 100), and nonvertebral fracture (n = 85) were also computed. At both sites, areal and volumetric BMD, cortical thickness and trabecular number, separation, and distribution were significantly worse in cases than in controls, with differences ranging from -6% to 15%. µFE-derived stiffness and failure load were 8% to 9% lower in fractures (p < .01). No difference in load distribution was found between the two groups. After adjustment for aBMD, only differences of µFE-derived stresses, stiffness, and failure load at the tibia remained significant (p < .05). PCA resulted in defining 4 independent PCs, explaining 83% of the total variability of bone characteristics. Nonvertebral fractures were associated with PC1, reflecting bone quantity and strength at the radius (tibia) with OR = 1.64 [1.27-2.12] (2.21 [1.60-3.04]), and with PC2, defined by trabecular microarchitecture, with OR = 1.27 [1.00-1.61]. Severe vertebral fractures were associated with PC1, with OR = 1.56 [1.16-2.09] (2.21 [1.59-3.07]), and with PC2, with OR = 1.55 [1.17-2.06] (1.45 [1.06-1.98]). In conclusion, microarchitecture and biomechanical properties derived from µFE were associated with all types of fractures in men, showing that radius and tibia mechanical properties were relatively representative of distant bone site properties.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541999     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  55 in total

Review 1.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Predicting mouse vertebra strength with micro-computed tomography-derived finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Alexander J Makowski; Barbara J Rowland; Alyssa R Merkel; Julie A Sterling; Todd L Bredbenner; Daniel S Perrien
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-04-22

3.  Cortical microstructure and estimated bone strength in young amenorrheic athletes, eumenorrheic athletes and non-athletes.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Melissa Putman; Gabriela Guereca; Alexander P Taylor; Lisa Pierce; David B Herzog; Anne Klibanski; Mary Bouxsein; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Age-related differences in volumetric bone mineral density, microarchitecture, and bone strength of distal radius and tibia in Chinese women: a high-resolution pQCT reference database study.

Authors:  V W Y Hung; T Y Zhu; W-H Cheung; T-N Fong; F W P Yu; L-K Hung; K-S Leung; J C Y Cheng; T-P Lam; L Qin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Regional Variations of HR-pQCT Morphological and Biomechanical Measurements of the Distal Radius and Tibia and Their Associations with Whole Bone Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Zhendong Zhang; Yizhong Hu; Ji Wang; Y Eric Yu; Shashank Nawathe; Kyle K Nishiyama; Tony M Keaveny; Elizabeth Shane; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Simplified boundary conditions alter cortical-trabecular load sharing at the distal radius; A multiscale finite element analysis.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Karen L Troy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Bone Strength Estimated by Micro-Finite Element Analysis (µFEA) Is Heritable and Shares Genetic Predisposition With Areal BMD: The Framingham Study.

Authors:  David Karasik; Serkalem Demissie; Darlene Lu; Kerry E Broe; Steven K Boyd; Ching-Ti Liu; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Mary L Bouxsein; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Association of High-resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT) bone microarchitectural parameters with previous clinical fracture in older men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  Howard A Fink; Lisa Langsetmo; Tien N Vo; Eric S Orwoll; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Vertebral body morphology is associated with incident lumbar vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. The OFELY study.

Authors:  J P Roux; S Belghali; J Wegrzyn; E S Rendu; R Chapurlat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Accurate and Efficient Plate and Rod Micro Finite Element Whole Bone Models Based on High-Resolution Peripheral Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Ji Wang; Bin Zhou; Yizhong Hu; Zhendong Zhang; Y Eric Yu; Shashank Nawathe; Kyle K Nishiyama; Tony M Keaveny; Elizabeth Shane; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.