Literature DB >> 30402789

A novel technique with reduced computed tomography exposure to predict vertebral compression fracture: a finite element study based on rat vertebrae.

Giovanni F Solitro1,2, Florian Mainnemare3, Farid Amirouche4, Ankit Mehta5.   

Abstract

Vertebral compression fractures are a significant clinical issue with an annual incidence of approximately 750,000 cases in the USA alone. Mechanical properties of vertebrae are successfully evaluated through finite element (FE) models based on vertebrae CT. However, clinical drawbacks associated to radiation transmission encouraged to explore the possibility to use selected or reduced portions of the vertebra. The objective of our study was to develop a new procedure to predict vertebral compression fracture from sub-volumes. We reconstructed rat vertebras from micro-CT of thoracic and lumbar groups. Each vertebra was partitioned into three sub-volumes of different axial thickness. FE simulating compression tests were performed on each model to evaluate their failure load and stiffness. Using a power function, a high correlation was found for stiffness and strength. The sub-volume with three fifths thickness had a failure load of 180.7 ± 19.2 N for thoracic and of 209.5 ± 27.4 N for the lumbar vertebra. These values were not significantly different from the values found for the entire vertebra (p > 0.05). Based on our findings, failure loads and stiffnesses obtained with reduced CT scans can be successfully used to predict full vertebral failure. This sub-region analysis and power relationship suggests that one can limit radiation exposure to patients when bone characterization is needed. Graphical abstract Estimated mechanical properties in relation to the extent of the computed tomography reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compression; Compressive strength; Fractures; Lumbar vertebrae; Rats; Thoracic vertebrae

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30402789     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-018-1918-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  50 in total

1.  Three-dimensional morphometry of the L6 vertebra in the ovariectomized rat model of osteoporosis: biomechanical implications.

Authors:  J H Kinney; D L Haupt; M Balooch; A J Ladd; J T Ryaby; N E Lane
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Indirect determination of trabecular bone effective tissue failure properties using micro-finite element simulations.

Authors:  E Verhulp; B van Rietbergen; R Müller; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique.

Authors:  Ahad Zeinali; Bijan Hashemi; Shahram Akhlaghpoor
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Numerical errors and uncertainties in finite-element modeling of trabecular bone.

Authors:  A J Ladd; J H Kinney
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The role of cortical shell and trabecular fabric in finite element analysis of the human vertebral body.

Authors:  Yan Chevalier; Dieter Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  Validation of computational models in biomechanics.

Authors:  H B Henninger; S P Reese; A E Anderson; J A Weiss
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.617

7.  The degree of bone mineralization is maintained with single intravenous bisphosphonates in aged estrogen-deficient rats and is a strong predictor of bone strength.

Authors:  Wei Yao; Zhiqiang Cheng; Kurt J Koester; Joel W Ager; Mehdi Balooch; Aaron Pham; Solomon Chefo; Cheryl Busse; Robert O Ritchie; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Alendronate versus calcitriol for the prevention of bone loss after cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Shane; Vicki Addesso; Pearila B Namerow; Donald J McMahon; Shaw-Hwa Lo; Ronald B Staron; Mark Zucker; Susan Pardi; Simon Maybaum; Donna Mancini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Ego Seeman
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.098

10.  Sclerostin antibody inhibits skeletal deterioration due to reduced mechanical loading.

Authors:  Jordan M Spatz; Rachel Ellman; Alison M Cloutier; Leeann Louis; Miranda van Vliet; Larry J Suva; Denise Dwyer; Marina Stolina; Hua Zhu Ke; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.