Literature DB >> 25899298

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurovascular dysfunction in mild dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Melanie D Sweeney1, Abhay P Sagare1, Berislav V Zlokovic1.   

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of age-related dementias. In addition to genetics, environment, and lifestyle, growing evidence supports vascular contributions to dementias including dementia because of AD. Alzheimer's disease affects multiple cell types within the neurovascular unit (NVU), including brain vascular cells (endothelial cells, pericytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells), glial cells (astrocytes and microglia), and neurons. Thus, identifying and integrating biomarkers of the NVU cell-specific responses and injury with established AD biomarkers, amyloid-β (Aβ) and tau, has a potential to contribute to better understanding of the disease process in dementias including AD. Here, we discuss the existing literature on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of the NVU cell-specific responses during early stages of dementia and AD. We suggest that the clinical usefulness of established AD biomarkers, Aβ and tau, could be further improved by developing an algorithm that will incorporate biomarkers of the NVU cell-specific responses and injury. Such biomarker algorithm could aid in early detection and intervention as well as identify novel treatment targets to delay disease onset, slow progression, and/or prevent AD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25899298      PMCID: PMC4640280          DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.200


Introduction

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major cause of dementia[1] and the sixth leading cause of death in the US. Currently affecting 5.2 million Americans, this number is projected to triple by 2050.[2] The economic impact of AD includes enormous health care costs, unpaid wages of family/friends caring for AD individuals, and an overall reduction in national productivity.[3] Alzheimer's disease affects multiple cell types within the neurovascular unit (NVU). The NVU is an interactive network of brain vascular cells (pericytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells), glial cells (astrocytes and microglia), and neurons[4, 5, 6] (Figure 1). Identifying and integrating biomarkers of the NVU cell-specific responses and injury with established AD biomarkers, amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) and tau, has a potential to contribute to better understanding of the disease process, which would importantly aid in diagnostic and treatment efforts.
Figure 1

Diagram of the neurovascular unit. The neurovascular unit represents an interactive network of vascular cells (pericytes and endothelial cells), glia (astrocytes and microglia), and neurons.

The vascular contributions to AD and other age-related dementias have been increasingly recognized as a research priority.[7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13] Vascular contributions are found in ~40% of all dementia cases.[10, 12, 13] In addition, search for novel biomarkers for preclinical AD has been identified as necessary for both early disease detection and evaluating the effectiveness of clinical trials.[10, 14] Therefore, here we review vascular contributions in dementia and AD and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of the NVU cell-specific responses during early stages of dementia and AD. Blood-based biomarkers for AD have been recently reviewed (see below section Blood-based Biomarkers).

Neurovascular dysfunction

The influence of vascular dysfunction has been an increasing focus in the AD field with notable support in the last decade.[4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21] According to pathologic studies, ~50% of patients diagnosed with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have mixed AD/vascular pathologies, which increases with age,[22] including microinfarcts, arteriosclerosis, or atherosclerosis.[23, 24] Autopsies from AD patients further revealed the presence of cerebrovascular disease suggesting that vasculature plays a notable role in neurodegeneration.[25] In this section, we review studies describing neurovascular dysfunction in early dementia and AD, particularly in regard to the blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and glucose transport into the brain. We also briefly discuss findings in the corresponding transgenic animal models. Finally, we discuss the two-hit vascular hypothesis of AD.

Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity

Endothelial cells and mural perivascular pericytes form the BBB.[5, 12, 21] The BBB is a highly selective barrier between blood and the central nervous system that limits entry into the brain of potentially toxic plasma-derived proteins, circulating metals, cells, and pathogens. In contrast to nutrients (e.g., glucose and amino acids) that are transported across the BBB via specialized transport systems,[5] peptides and other larger molecules do not cross the BBB[26, 27] unless they have specific carriers and/or receptors expressed in the brain endothelium.[28, 29] Quite the reverse of brain capillaries, systemic capillaries have a permeable vascular barrier allowing transport of solutes and larger molecules to parenchymal tissue.[30] Maintaining the BBB integrity is vital for proper physiologic functioning of neurons and brain circuitries. Studies in transgenic mice have shown that pericytes maintain the BBB integrity and that loss of pericytes leads to a chronic BBB breakdown associated with accumulation of blood-derived neurotoxic proteins in the CNS causing neuronal dysfunction, injury, and loss.[21, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35] Multiple postmortem studies in AD brains have shown BBB breakdown including accumulation in the hippocampus and cortex of blood-derived proteins (e.g., immunoglobulins, albumin, fibrinogen, and thrombin)[36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41] and degeneration of BBB-associated pericytes.[41, 42, 43] Neuroimaging studies have shown microbleeds and accumulation of blood-derived iron in AD,[44, 45, 46] particularly in the hippocampus.[47] Early neuroimaging attempts to measure the BBB permeability Ktrans constant in the brain in individuals with MCI and AD failed to detect significant changes in BBB integrity.[48, 49] These studies might have been hampered by their relatively long time resolution and the semiquantitative nature of their analyses. More recent studies acquired at higher field strengths and using more sophisticated kinetic modeling have determined that the Ktrans of healthy BBB is low but not zero and detected differences in the white matter (WM) in patients with multiple sclerosis.[50, 51, 52] A recent study using an advanced dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol has determined for the first time low levels of regional BBB permeability (i.e., Ktrans constant) in the living human brain simultaneously in multiple gray and WM regions.[53] This study found an age-dependent BBB breakdown in the hippocampus and its CA1 and dentate gyrus subdivisions, but not other brain regions, during normal aging, and worsening in individuals with mild dementia (i.e., MCI) compared with age-matched controls with no cognitive impairment (NCI).[53] Interestingly, the CSF biomarkers of BBB breakdown (e.g., albumin quotient (Qalb)) and pericyte-specific injury (e.g., soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β, sPDGFRβ) were both increased in MCI compared with NCI individuals and correlated well with the Ktrans measure of BBB breakdown in the hippocampus and its CA1 and dentate gyrus regions.[53] This study also found that MCI individuals with increased Ktrans BBB permeability had no significant alterations in inflammatory, neuronal (total and phosphorylated tau, pTau), or Aβ biomarkers in the CSF compared with age-matched NCI controls[53] suggesting that excessive vascular leakage between the brain and the blood may be an early critical step toward age-related dementias that starts in the hippocampus, a learning and memory center of the brain. Notably, the Ktrans values from recent studies in the normal living human brain[53] were within a range of previously reported BBB Ktrans values determined in mammals.[28, 33, 54] Owing to the improved technology, future in vivo human studies are likely to emerge in the coming years to further assess BBB integrity in the context of AD and other neurologic conditions. In addition to pericyte-deficient mice,[31, 32, 33] the BBB breakdown has been shown in three different lines of AD transgenic mice overexpressing Aβ-precursor protein (APP)[55] and in mice overexpressing Slit-2, a gene involved in cell migration,[56] that develop behavioral deficits associated with increased BBB permeability and Aβ accumulation.

Cerebral Blood Flow

Resting CBF is diminished in older cognitively normal individuals at risk for AD,[57, 58] in AD patients,[59] and during normal aging in apolipoprotein E ɛ4 (APOE ɛ4) carriers, that is a major genetic risk factor for late onset AD.[60] Cerebral blood flow dysfunction can occur prior to cognitive impairment.[61] Cerebral hypoperfusion has been confirmed in AD patients by the arterial spin labeling MRI studies.[62] Dysregulated CBF responses were found in AD as reviewed elsewhere.[13, 15] Microvascular and CBF reductions were also found in early disease stage in different APP transgenic models,[54, 63, 64] senescence-accelerated prone mouse strain 8 mice,[65] and pericyte-deficient mice.[33, 66] Cerebral microvascular Aβ deposits have been shown in different APP transgenic models.[67]

Glucose Transport

The glucose transporter GLUT1 is exclusively expressed at the BBB.[5, 12] GLUT1 mediates delivery of glucose, a key energy metabolite, to the brain. The crystal structure of human GLUT1 has been recently reported.[68] Local glucose uptake by the brain closely correlates with GLUT1 levels in cerebral microvessels that are increased in response to increased neuronal activity and metabolic demand.[69, 70, 71] Reduced glucose uptake in the hippocampus, parietotemporal cortex, and/or posterior cingulate cortex was found by 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) in AD APOE ɛ4 carriers,[72, 73] individuals with positive family history,[74] and/or MCI or NCI who develop AD later in life. 2-[18F] Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET changes can precede brain atrophy and neuronal dysfunction in humans[73, 75] and transgenic APP models.[76] Moreover, reductions in BBB glucose transport have been suggested to lead to 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET changes.[77, 78] Consistent with these findings, diminished GLUT1 levels in brain microvessels have been reported in AD patients.[79, 80, 81, 82] Whether reduced BBB transport of glucose contributes to brain hypometabolic state and neurodegeneration or is the by-product of neurodegeneration is unclear at present. It is also elusive whether loss of GLUT1 can lead to BBB breakdown in AD as it does in the lower vertebrates.[83]

Two-Hit Vascular Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease

The two-hit vascular hypothesis of AD proposes that microvascular damage is an initial insult through which BBB dysfunction and/or diminished brain perfusion lead to secondary neuronal injury and prime the brain for Aβ accumulation.[12] The BBB breakdown results in leakage of neurotoxic proteins into the brain that is followed by astrocyte and microglia response, aberrant vascular remodeling (i.e., angiogenesis), and inflammatory response[12] that all can promote neuronal injury (e.g., formation of toxic tau neurofibrillary tangles, WM damage, and decreased dendritic spine density) and Aβ accumulation. There is notable interplay between Aβ-independent and Aβ-dependent pathways in AD development, both of which are impacted by the presence of genetic, environmental, lifestyle, and/or vascular risk factors (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The two-hit vascular model of Alzheimer's disease (AD): amyloid-β (Aβ)-independent and Aβ-dependent mechanisms. The development of AD is influenced by genetic, vascular, and environmental risk factors and lifestyle. The pathophysiology of AD can progress through both Aβ-independent and Aβ-dependent pathways. There is interplay between the two mechanisms. Specifically, vascular damage initiates the Aβ-independent mechanism, which can in turn induce Aβ and tau accumulation and neuronal injury. The Aβ-dependent mechanism arises from enhanced Aβ processing, altered Aβ metabolism, and faulty Aβ clearance. Ultimately both pathways can lead to neuronal dysfunction and degeneration resulting in dementia.

Genetic risk factors: Effects on vascular system

Mutations in the APP sequence lead to inherited forms of cerebrovascular Aβ amyloidosis, genes that cause early onset familial AD (FAD), and genetic risk factors for late onset AD can affect the cerebrovascular system, as reviewed in this section.

Vasculotropic Aβ Mutations

Mutations in Aβ21 to 23 residues (namely Dutch, Flemish, Iowa, and Arctic) are primarily vasculotropic and associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) with intracerebral bleeding.[84] Microbleeds can be detected through T2*-weighted MRI scans and/or the more sensitive MR susceptibility–weighted imaging.[85] Brain microbleeds, reflecting deposits of blood-derived iron-containing hemosiderin, are associated with cognitive impairment and have been shown to disrupt network connections in early-stage AD.[86] Cerebral amyloid angiopathy–associated microbleeds are found in the majority of AD brains.[87] Faulty clearance of vasculotropic Aβ peptides across the BBB[88, 89] plays a significant role in the etiology of both AD and CAA.[90, 91] Transgenic mice expressing vasculotropic Dutch and Swedish/London FAD mutations develop CBF perturbations, increased microvascular and parenchymal Aβ deposits, and behavioral deficits.[92] These studies suggest that genetic causes of vascular dysfunction associated with CAA promote the development of cognitive impairment and Aβ deposits. Still, the field is lacking reliable biomarkers that define the clinical severity of CAA, which could be similarly informative in AD development.

Early Onset Familial Alzheimer's Disease

Genetic mutations within APP, presenilin-1 (PS1), and PS2 result in early onset FAD.[93, 94] To date, only a few studies investigate injury to the NVU cell types in FAD. For instance, postmortem studies have shown degeneration of pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells and perivascular amyloid deposits in the brains of PS1 mutation carriers.[95] Multiple types of Aβ deposits (i.e., preamyloid, neuritic, and dense cored) were found associated with arteries and capillaries in FAD.[96] Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is frequently present in individuals with FAD including Arctic APP and PS1 mutations.[97, 98] One case study reports disruption in meningeal, subpial, and cortical arterioles in a patient with a PS1 mutation.[98] Studies in transgenic mice have informed FAD pathophysiology. For example, APPSwe;PS1M146L mice (i.e., APPSwe mice crossed with PS1M146L mutant line) have BBB and microvascular dysfunction causing leakage of blood-derived proteins and the dense-core Aβ deposited in perivascular areas and/or directly attached to vessel walls.[67] Recently, disrupted cerebral microvasculature, BBB breakdown, and microaneurysms have been described in APPSwe:PS1ΔE9 mice.[99] In addition to amyloid deposits and tau accumulation, mice expressing human PS1 mutants PS1P117L and PS1M146V exhibited age-related vascular changes such as thinning capillaries with abnormal loops, string vessels, cortical surface microhemorrhages, and endothelial cell injury.[100] The reduced microvasculature in the hippocampus was associated with hippocampal atrophy.[100] Interestingly, expression of PS1P117L and PS1M146V in these mice was driven by a neuronal promoter[100] suggesting that aberrant signaling between neurons and vascular cells may induce vascular pathophysiology in a mouse model of FAD. Given the presence of vascular disruption in combination with Aβ and tau, future longitudinal studies in FAD patients investigating additional NVU biomarkers would help define FAD pathologic progression and could ultimately aid in research efforts to better understand pathogenesis and therapeutic targets in FAD, and by extension in AD.

Late Onset Alzheimer's Disease

The large majority of AD cases are sporadic, late onset. The strongest genetic rick factor identified for late onset AD is APOE ɛ4.[101] Apolipoprotein E ɛ4 increases risk for AD by 7% and 28% and 30% and 60% in carriers with one and two APOE ɛ4 alleles, respectively, at ages 75 and 85.[101] Studies in transgenic mice have shown that APOE ɛ4 regulates cerebrovascular integrity[34] and Aβ clearance from the brain.[102] Postmortem human studies have shown that APOE ɛ4 genotype accelerates the BBB damage in AD patients[37, 38, 40, 46, 103, 104] and increases CAA severity[105] and fibrinogen deposition associated with microvascular Aβ deposits.[40] In addition, young cognitively normal APOE ɛ4 carriers have impaired cerebrovascular reactivity in response to memory task and CO2 inhalation.[106] Studies in mice with targeted replacement of murine Apoe with each human APOE isoform and in mice expressing each human APOE isoform under control of the astrocyte-specific glial fibrillar acidic protein promoter on an Apoe null background suggest that human ApoE impacts cerebrovascular and BBB integrity via brain pericytes in an isoform-dependent manner.[34] ApoE4, but not ApoE3 and ApoE2, increases the levels of proinflammatory cytokine cyclophilin A (CypA) in pericytes, which leads to increased levels of the matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) resulting in degradation of BBB tight junction and basement membrane proteins and BBB breakdown causing secondary neuronal dysfunction and degenerative changes.[34] Reduced cerebral vascularization and BBB breakdown in human APOE ɛ4 targeted replacement mice compared with mice expressing APOE ɛ3 and APOE ɛ2 have been recently confirmed by an independent study.[107] Interestingly, a recent study in cognitively normal human APOE ɛ4 carriers compared with APOE ɛ3 carriers has shown an age-dependent increase in CypA and active MMP-9 levels in the CSF suggestive of activation of the CypA-MMP-9 pathway that correlated with increased CSF/plasma albumin ratio indicating BBB breakdown.[103] In addition to confirming APOE ɛ4 as a major genetic risk factor for AD, genome-wide association studies have identified multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms in different genes associated with AD.[108, 109, 110] The biology of these AD-associated genes and allelic variants remains, however, elusive for the majority of genes and single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Some AD genes can potentially directly affect the cerebrovascular system as, for example, the transvascular Aβ clearance across the BBB (e.g., APOE[102] and CLU[111]), and/or Aβ production (PS1, PS2, PICALM, BIN1, ATXN1, and ADAM10[112]), Aβ aggregation (APOE), and Aβ degradation (CD33, CR1, and EPHA1).[113] The relationship between neurovascular dysfunction and genes and single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with late onset AD remains to be investigated by future studies.

Lifestyle and vascular risk

Lifestyle (e.g., diet and exercise) and vascular-related risk factors (e.g., hypertension, atherosclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obesity) influence cognitive impairment in age-related dementias and AD.[10, 14, 114] Arterial stiffening is associated with reduced vascular clearance of Aβ.[12, 91] Hypertension and an altered CSF AD biomarker profile (low Aβ42, high total tau, and high pTau) leads to increased gray matter degeneration in a presymptomatic period.[115]

Diet

The major component of essential omega-3 fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), has long been known to be beneficial to cognition and overall brain health.[116] Alzheimer's disease patients have lower DHA lipid levels in the CSF.[117] The primary DHA transporter at the BBB is the major facilitator superfamily domain containing 2A transporter, recently shown to have a dual function at the BBB mediating transport of DHA into the brain and also regulating the BBB integrity.[118, 119, 120] Its role in AD and dementia remains, however, unknown. Interestingly, transgenic APOE ɛ4 mice show reduced brain uptake of DHA compared with transgenic APOE ɛ2 mice.[121] High dietary consumption of cocoa flavanols has been recently shown to enhance dentate gyrus–associated cognitive function in the hippocampus of healthy cognitively normal individuals by increasing capillary density, as shown by cerebral blood volume functional MRI measurements, suggesting the hippocampus likely has a significant vasculoplastic reserve.[122] The relationship between vasculoplasticity and neuronal plasticity during normal aging and dementia, and how it is impacted by diet and risk factors (i.e., genetic, vascular, environment, and lifestyle), remains largely unknown and should be addressed by future studies.[123]

Exercise

Exercise and increased physical activity and higher midlife fitness levels are associated with reduced risk of all-cause dementias including AD.[124] Previous studies in laboratory animals have shown that environmental enrichment or functional enriched high activity promote Aβ clearance from the brain by accelerating Aβ enzymatic degradation and enhancing Aβ transvascular transport, which reduces Aβ levels and amyloid deposition in transgenic mouse models of AD.[125, 126] It has been demonstrated that enriched activity upregulates expression of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1,[127] a major Aβ clearance receptor at the BBB[12, 66, 88] and in smooth muscle cells of small penetrating brain arteries,[128] and downregulates expression of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGEs) at the BBB, which mediates reentry and influx of Aβ from circulation into the brain.[129] These molecular changes in brain vascular system create favorable conditions for Aβ clearance counteracting Alzheimer's vascular dysfunction. Though the precise mechanisms remain still largely elusive, lifestyle and vascular health have been increasingly recognized as key modulators of one's risk for developing AD.

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of the neurovascular unit

The lack of presymptomatic detection with reliable biomarkers is a major limitation for developing and implementing successful treatments for AD. Established AD biomarkers include tau (total and phosphorylated at threonine 181 and 231) and 42-amino acid Aβ. Decreased Aβ42 levels and increased tau and pTau levels in the CSF are reproducibly shown at different stages during AD,[130, 131, 132] as discussed below. Aβ42 is also shown to be decreased in the CSF during preclinical stages of AD, particularly in APOE ɛ4 carriers.[133] It has been suggested that individuals with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and pTau181P levels likely to have an asymptomatic period of 7 years before the onset of cognitive impairment and AD clinical diagnosis.[134] Whether CSF biomarkers reflecting NVU cell-specific injury are altered before or after Aβ and tau remains elusive, at present.[135] Identifying novel NVU biofluid-based biomarkers associated with early cognitive impairment in individuals at risk for AD has the potential to provide a molecular phenotype associated with early stages of AD development.

Cerebrospinal Fluid as a Source of the Neurovascular Unit Biomarkers

Cerebrospinal fluid is ideal for molecular biomarker studies because its juxtaposition with brain interstitial space may reflect a measure of brain biochemical changes. In addition, the CSF compartment is isolated from systemic influences by the BBB and the blood–CSF barrier.[12] There is, however, a large degree of inconsistency in AD biomarker studies (with the exception of the established biomarkers, Aβ and tau). This could be attributed to the (1) lack of sample/procedural standardization (discussed in Standardization and Validity section), (2) failure to adequately account for risk factors, and (3) cross-sectional study design. The heterogeneity in AD patients is becoming increasingly apparent because of differential contributions of lifestyle and genetic, vascular, and environmental risk factors. In addition, in the prodromal stage of AD, namely MCI, some individuals remain arrested at this stage while others convert to AD. Given this prodromal phase, dichotomizing subjects into only two categories, cognitively normal and cognitively impaired, does not completely represent the molecular and phenotypic stages of cognitive impairment in AD. Cross-sectional studies should carefully distinguish cognitive status; however, longitudinal studies are ideal to account for individual variations as related to the progression of cognitive decline and AD pathophysiologic changes. Although established biomarkers Aβ42, pTau, and total tau are altered in preclinical stages and throughout AD, the clinical use of these markers is still relatively limited. Importantly, AD progresses through overlapping Aβ-independent and Aβ-dependent pathways (Figure 2), and numerous cell types are affected within the NVU (Figure 1). There are few existing studies that have been conducted to characterize markers of nonneuronal cell types of the NVU.[20, 135] Moreover, majority of biomarker studies are narrow in scope and investigate a single category of injury in AD. Conducting simultaneous biomarker measurements would importantly allow for direct comparison across multiple cell types within the NVU as related to cognitive impairment and decline. Below, we discuss a breakdown of CSF biomarkers into categories of NVU cell- and system-specific injury. Evidence is provided to suggest there is differential regulation of these markers in early cognitive impairment and AD.

Biomarkers of Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown and Vascular Injury

Given the early occurrence of vascular dysfunction in AD,[12, 13, 136] investigating biomarkers of BBB breakdown and vascular injury has the potential to importantly aid in early diagnosis of vascular dysfunction in AD.

Albumin cerebrospinal fluid/plasma ratio

Earlier studies using Qalb or the CSF to plasma ratio of blood-derived albumin have shown BBB breakdown in AD, particularly associated with vascular risk factors, WM lesions, subcortical vascular dementia, or accompanying vascular disorders (e.g., arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease), but not in AD cases without vascular factors.[137, 138, 139] Others found that Qalb is higher in all dementias including AD[140] suggesting that BBB dysfunction is an early event in the disease process regardless of the type of dementia, i.e., AD or vascular dementia. More recent studies have confirmed these findings by showing elevated Qalb with age in individuals with NCI carrying an APOE ɛ4 allele, but not an APOE ɛ3 allele[103] and in MCI patients, which correlated with elevated Ktrans BBB permeability constant in the hippocampus as determined by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.[53] Increasing evidence suggests clinical and pathologic overlap between AD and other AD-related dementias including vascular dementia. Thus, though Qalb as a marker of BBB breakdown is elevated in dementias including AD, it does not appear to be specific to AD. Overall, these data highlight the heterogeneity observed in AD patients, and the importance of accounting for the presence and impact of vascular risk factors, APOE genotype, and other potential risk factors in analyses.

Other biomarkers of blood–brain barrier breakdown

Based on experimental and postmortem human studies, additional proposed molecular markers of BBB breakdown include increased levels of the proinflammatory cytokine CypA, active MMP-9, and blood-derived fibrinogen and plasminogen.[34, 39, 104] Albumin quotient, CypA, and active MMP-9 in CSF were all shown to be increased in older cognitively normal APOE ɛ4 carriers, but not in young APOE ɛ4 carriers or APOE ɛ4 noncarriers.[103] In addition, CSF levels of fibrinogen are increased in mild dementia.[141] Postmortem analysis of AD brain tissue compared with control brains showed increased extravascular fibrinogen, IgG, and Aβ deposits located close to blood vessels.[39] Interestingly, MMP-9 is activated on fibrinogen binding to vascular endothelium, which may result in BBB breakdown.[142] Plasminogen CSF levels were not altered in AD,[143, 144] whereas MCI individuals had elevated[144] CSF plasminogen (Table 1). The BBB breakdown and the resulting infiltration of blood-derived neurotoxic proteins can subsequently lead to neuronal injury as shown in experimental models.[21, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]
Table 1

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of BBB breakdown, vascular cells and astrocytes in mild dementia (i.e., MCI) and AD compared with cognitively normal individuals

 Mild dementiaAD
BBB breakdown
 Albumin quotienta↑Upregulation[53]↑Upregulation[137, 140] and in AD with vascular risk factors[137, 138]
 CypAaNo existing literatureNo existing literature
 Active MMP-9aNo existing literatureNo existing literature
 Plasminogen↑Upregulation[144]No change[143, 144]
 Fibrinogen↑Upregulation[141]No existing literature
   
Pericyte markers
 sPDGFRβ↑Upregulation[53]No existing literature
   
Endothelial markers
 PDGF-BBNo existing literature↑Upregulation[148]
 sVCAM-1No change[141]↓Downregulation[151]
 sICAM-1No change[141]No change[151]
   
Vascular growth factors
 VEGF-A↓Downregulation[141]↑Upregulation,[155] ↓Downregulation[148]
 VEGF-C, VEGF-D, and VEGFR1No existing literatureNo existing literature
 PlGFNo change[141]No existing literature
 Tie-2No existing literatureNo existing literature
   
Astrocyte markers
 S100BNo existing literatureNo change[162] ↑Upregulation[161]

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; BBB, blood–brain barrier; CypA, cyclophilin A; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; PlGF, placental growth factor; sICAM-1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1; sPDGFRβ, soluble platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β; sVCAM-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Upregulation in cerebrospinal fluid of cognitively normal subjects with genetic risk for AD.[103]

Pericyte markers

Experimental studies have demonstrated that brain pericytes are key to maintaining BBB integrity,[21, 31, 32, 33] and that loss of pericytes leads to a chronic BBB breakdown followed by secondary neurodegenerative changes.[12, 32, 33, 66, 145] Pericytes degenerate in AD[41, 42, 43] and AD models.[66, 146] Postmortem studies have shown that BBB breakdown in AD patients closely correlates with loss of pericytes[41] and is accelerated by APOE ɛ4 genotype.[104] Injury to cultured human pericytes results in shedding of soluble form of the pericyte marker PDGFRβ (sPDGFRβ), and CSF sPDGFRβ levels are increased in experimental models with pericyte degeneration and chronic BBB breakdown including pericyte-deficient and APPSwe mice.[53] Pericytes are extremely susceptible to changes in the CBF and die rapidly under hypoxic conditions associated with diminished CBF.[147] Interestingly, a recent study found increased CSF sPDGFRβ levels in individuals with mild dementia compared with controls, which correlated with increased BBB breakdown in the hippocampus.[53] Cerebrospinal fluid levels of endothelial-derived growth factor PDGF-BB are also increased in AD,[148] but whether this reflects a compensatory response to alleviate the loss of PDGFRβ signaling in pericytes remains unknown (Table 1). Although relatively new and not yet fully validated, the CSF markers of pericyte injury hold promise for detecting early vascular changes associated with early cognitive impairment or impairment in individuals at increased genetic risk for AD, such as APOE ɛ4 carriers.

Endothelial markers

Expression of endothelial adhesion molecules is suggested to reflect BBB dysfunction.[149] For example, in a transgenic mouse model with BBB dysfunction, both endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 are strongly associated with vessel albumin extravasation,[150] supporting that increased expression of endothelial adhesion molecules is related to vascular injury. In individuals with neuroinflammatory conditions, an increase in CSF soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM-1) levels correlated with Qalb.[149] Similarly in AD subjects, CSF levels of sICAM-1 and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 correlate highly with each other and with elevated BBB permeability measured by Qalb.[151] Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 is also reported to be decreased in AD patients[151] (Table 1). No change in sICAM-1 is reported in MCI[141] or AD patients[151] (Table 1). Given the evidence of vascular dysfunction in AD, studies on vascular injury markers could aid in better understanding whether brain endothelial responses are involved in early cognitive impairment and/or in a subset of AD patients with vascular risk factors or at genetic risk for AD.

Vascular Growth Factors

Vascular dysfunction and angiogenesis may collectively contribute to neurodegeneration.[152] Growing research in AD suggests that angiogenesis driven by pathologic events provides an additional avenue in promoting Aβ accumulation.[153] Markers known to be involved in both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis include the vascular endothelial growth factor family (VEGF): VEGF-A, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGFR1, and placental growth factor.[154] Cerebrospinal fluid levels of VEGF-A are decreased in MCI[141] and either increased[155] or decreased[148] in AD (Table 1). Surprisingly, CSF levels of VEGF-C, VEGF-D, and VEGFR1 have not been reported in cognitively impaired individuals. Similar to VEGF family members, both basic fibroblast growth factor and tyrosine-kinase signaling through the Tie-2 receptor are involved in vessel growth, maintenance, and repair,[152] and could be potential biomarkers. Brain endothelium from AD patients has been shown to have a diminished ability to respond to angiogenic factors VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factor because of extremely low levels of expression of homeodomain transcription factor mesenchyme homeobox gene 2, which leads to aberrant angiogenesis and death of newly formed capillary tubes in response to angiogenic stimulation.[156] In neurologic conditions such as AD there is mechanistic overlap in cell signaling within the NVU that can signify both (1) an acute injury response and (2) an endogenous response to initiate NVU repair and reorganization.[157] Thus, during the development of AD, it would be informative to clarify when gradients of angiogenic markers alternatively signal an injury versus repair phenomenon. This would help elucidate the molecular phenotype associated with AD progression, and could potentially inform the transition from prodromal stages to AD.

Astrocyte Markers

Astrocytes can regulate vasodilation and vasoconstriction through VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factor signal transduction to endothelial cells.[158] In addition, astrocyte-secreted factors transmit signal transduction to pericytes that critically maintains the BBB integrity.[34] Prolonged astrocyte activation in AD brains disrupts neuronal survival[159] suggesting that astrocytes are an intermediate player in AD pathogenesis. Furthermore, astrocyte-secreted cytokine beta-calgranulin (S100B) is involved in the innate immune response to AD.[160] S100B CSF levels are reported to be increased[161] or not altered[162] in AD compared with age-matched NCI individuals, whereas CSF S100B has not been reported in MCI (Table 1). Although the effect of elevated CSF S100B remains unknown, S100B can promote overexpression of neuronal APP and expression of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-1β.[163] In addition, overexpressing human S100B in APPSwe mice resulted in both parenchymal and cerebrovascular Aβ deposits.[160] Incorporating astrocyte markers in an algorithm with other biomarkers of the NVU would aid in clarifying molecular phenotypes of AD progression.

Inflammatory Response

Gliosis is one of the hallmark features of AD and refers to inflammatory response mounted by the brain's glial cells. Once thought to be a by-product of AD disease process, increasing research suggests the role of reactive astrocytes and microglia[164] and elevated levels of some cytokines in the plasma, serum, and/or CSF[165] in AD progression. However, several cytokines have not been analyzed in the CSF from MCI cases including IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and interferon-γ. Furthermore, CSF cytokine levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-10, and IL-1β have only been conducted in few studies in MCI cases.[141, 166] Table 2 describes changes in protein levels reported in CSF for inflammatory markers in both MCI and AD, relative to NCI.
Table 2

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of inflammatory response in mild dementia (i.e., MCI) and AD compared with cognitively normal individuals

 Mild dementiaAD
Inflammatory response
 TNF-α↓Downregulation[166]No change[169] ↑Upregulation[166, 168] ↓Downregulation[167]
 IL-1βNo change[166]No change[166, 167, 169] ↑Upregulation[171]
 IL-2No existing literatureNo change[168, 171]
 IL-8↑Upregulation[172]No change[203] ↑Upregulation[172]
 IL-10↑Upregulation[141]No change[169]
 IL-6No existing literatureNo change[167, 169, 173] ↑Upregulation[168, 171] ↓Downregulation[170]
 IL-12No existing literatureNo change[169]
 IFN-γNo existing literatureNo change[169]

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL, interleukin; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α.

Conflicting results have been reported for several cytokines in AD. More specifically, a decrease,[167] increase,[166, 168] or no change[169] is reported for tumor necrosis factor-α, a decrease,[170] increase,[168, 171] or no change[167, 169, 172, 173] is reported for IL-6, and an increase[171] or no change[166, 167, 169] is reported for IL-1β (Table 2). Although these studies found interesting changes, the findings are not always consistent. Thus, there is a need for standardization of sample collection, processing, and analyses as well as simultaneous biomarker measurements to help remedy these inconsistencies.

Biomarkers of White Matter Injury

Myelin integrity is damaged in AD as shown through diffusion-tensor imaging and is thought to contribute to impaired cognition.[174] A recent study showed that diffusivity measures could detect more subtle differences in MCI and AD brains compared with traditional fractional anisotropy measurements, which is a ‘gold standard' postprocessing paradigm used to assess WM integrity.[175] In addition, MCI individuals with both increased WM hyperintensities (WMHs) and increased temporoparietal glucose metabolism converted to AD, whereas MCI individuals without WMHs and metabolic disruption remained in prodromal stages.[176] Similarly, AD patients have increased WMHs compared with normal aging.[177] Interestingly, hypertensive individuals have heightened WMHs restricted to the periventricular region.[177] These data support the role of vascular dysfunction in AD etiology particularly in the presence of vascular risk factors. Myelin basic protein is degraded in periventricular WM and was identified in vessels surrounding these regions in AD brains.[178] However, no change in myelin basic protein expression was detected in AD compared with NCI in past CSF biomarker studies[162, 179] (Table 3). In addition, no studies have determined CSF levels of myelin basic protein in MCI, or myelin-associated glycoprotein in either MCI or AD (Table 3). The WMHs found in AD could be either a by-product of normal aging or the concurrent presence of vascular conditions such as cerebrovascular disease or ischemic injury. Given the association of hypertension and vascular changes with WMHs,[177] it would be interesting to see whether biomarkers of WM injury correlate with markers of vascular injury. Nevertheless, incorporating WM markers in an algorithm of other NVU biomarkers could help define the heterogeneity of AD patients and stages of disease progression.
Table 3

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of white matter damage, amyloid-β (Aβ), and neuronal injury in mild dementia (i.e., MCI) and AD compared with cognitively normal individuals

 Mild dementiaAD
White matter damage
 MBPNo existing literatureNo change[162, 179]
 MAGNo existing literatureNo existing literature
   
Aβ peptide
 Aβ-42↓Downregulation[141, 183]↓Downregulation[130, 148, 184]
   
Neuronal injury
 Total tau↑Upregulation[141, 183]↑Upregulation[130, 148, 184]
 pTau↑Upregulation[183, 187]↑Upregulation[130, 184]
 NSENo existing literatureNo change[162] ↑Upregulation[192, 193]
 Neurofilament-LNo existing literature↑Upregulation[190, 191]

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; Aβ, amyloid-β; MAG, myelin-associated glycoprotein; MBP, myelin basic protein; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; pTau, phosphorylated tau.

Amyloid-β Peptide

Amyloid deposits are visualized with a PET tracer Pittsburgh compound B, which detects both microvascular and parenchymal Aβ.[180] Amyloid can deposit in the brain years prior to AD clinical onset.[181] In NCI individuals, CSF Aβ42 levels decrease prior to amyloid deposition in the brain, particularly in APOE ɛ4 carriers.[133] Literature consistently reports lower CSF levels of Aβ42 in MCI,[141, 182, 183] which is further decreased in AD[148, 184] (Table 3). NCI individuals with abnormal CSF Aβ42 and pTau181P levels develop cognitive impairment faster than those with normal CSF Aβ42 and pTau181P levels; however, some individuals with abnormal AD-injury biomarkers remain cognitively normal for up to 7 years.[134] Thus, identifying a cutoff level of CSF Aβ42 and confirming this marker's ability to predict cortical Aβ deposition is important for establishing the clinical usefulness of CSF Aβ42 for routine clinical practice.[185] How Aβ CSF levels relate to BBB breakdown and vascular and inflammatory biomarkers in the CSF remains elusive at present. A recent study found that CSF sPDGFRβ, a marker of pericyte injury, is elevated in mild dementia prior to changes in CSF Aβ42 levels and inflammatory changes.[53] Incorporating biomarkers of the NVU in prodromal stage along with established AD biomarkers could greatly enhance the ability to predict cell-specific involvement in the development of dementia, which may point to novel therapeutic targets.

Neuronal Injury

Literature reports a consistent upregulation of both total and pTau231P in MCI,[141, 182, 183, 186, 187] which is further increased in AD[148, 182, 184, 188] (Table 3) and correlates with hippocampal atrophy.[189] Also, the CSF levels of neuronal markers neurofilament-L[190, 191] and neuron-specific enolase[192, 193] are elevated in AD (Table 3). In MCI, CSF levels have not been reported for either neuron-specific enolase or neurofilament-L (Table 3). No study, however, describes how markers of neuronal injury relate to markers of vascular injury during prodromal stage of dementia and AD, and whether alterations in the CSF levels occur simultaneously or have a differential time course for different cell-specific biomarkers.

Oxidative and Metabolic Stress

Oxidative stress likely contributes to different stages of AD pathogenesis by damaging cell proteins and cell membrane lipids.[194] For example, oxidative damage to low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1, a key clearance receptor for Aβ,[12] leads to formation of oxidized low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 that cannot bind Aβ and mediate its efflux at the BBB.[195] Cerebrospinal fluid lactate levels are higher in mild AD compared with moderate/severe AD[196] suggesting either metabolic stress or compensatory changes in brain metabolism. Cholesterol metabolism depends on intact BBB.[197] Decreased CSF cholesterol levels correlate with increased CSF APPα and APPβ (products of APP processing) levels and a robust decrease in CSF Aβ42 suggesting a possible relationship between cholesterol metabolism and increased amyloidogenesis.[198] Cerebrospinal fluid levels of ApoA-I, the major component of high-density lipoproteins involved in cholesterol transport and lipid metabolism, are also decreased in AD patients.[199] Moreover, AD patients have lower CSF levels of DHA, whereas MCI subjects have lower levels of α-liolenic acid.[117] Both, DHA and α-liolenic acid are components of omega-3 fatty acids, suggesting that disrupted polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism may contribute to AD and could be a result of reduced neurovascular integrity through the dual role of the major facilitator superfamily domain containing 2A[118, 119, 120] (discussed in Lifestyle and Vascular Risk section). Given the possible impact of oxidative and metabolic stress on the NVU and brain functions in AD, markers of oxidative stress, mitochondrial, and metabolic changes could be useful for early detection of vascular-mediated injury in AD.[200]

Current Status of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurovascular Unit Biomarkers Studies

Collectively, the reviewed CSF biomarker studies raise a possibility that differential expression of biomarkers in multiple cell types within the NVU may relate to the disease process and cognitive decline. For example, biomarkers of pericyte-specific vascular injury (elevated sPDGFRβ)[53] and loss of cerebrovascular integrity (increased plasminogen[143] and fibrinogen[141]) and early growth factors mediating angiogenic response (VEGF-A[141] and IL-8[172]) show large changes associated with mild dementia (i.e., MCI) but have less or no regulation in advanced disease stages (Tables 1 and 2), suggesting possibly early involvement and responses of the vascular system. Similarly, BBB damage is seen early in older individuals with genetic risk for AD before cognitive impairent.[103] However, neuronal injury markers (total tau and pTau) and Aβ42 reveal relatively moderate changes in early cognitive impairment stage, but are greatly enhanced during AD disease progression (Table 3). Surprisingly, Aβ42 and tau are infrequently studied in relation to biomarkers of the NVU responses and/or injury. Nor has the relationship between the NVU biomarkers and imaging biomarkers of neurovascular function and brain function, and/or risk factors been thoroughly investigated. All these factors may influence interpretation of the results even for established AD biomarkers. For example, elevated arterial pulse pressure in NCI individuals correlates with decreased Aβ42 and increased pTau levels[201] suggesting an AD CSF profile. Moreover, CSF pTau231P levels are increased in hypertensive elderly NCI individuals suggesting AD-like CSF changes.[202]

Current limitations

Several factors limit comparison and meta-analysis of the current biomarker studies. This includes, but is not limited to, differences in cross-sectional design, failure to account for known risk factors, unstandardized sample collection and processing, and inconsistent protein detection methods across laboratories. Majority of existing CSF biomarker studies used traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, which in some cases might have a limited range of detection and may lack the needed sensitivity to detect changes in CSF protein levels during disease states. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) was largely used as the clinical criteria for categorizing cognitive status of NCI, MCI, and AD using a cross-sectional design, with scores ranging from 27 to 30, 22 to 27, and <22, respectively,[141, 144, 148, 151, 186, 203] but often overlooking potential lifestyle, vascular, and genetic risk factors, and/or environmental influences, which may alter the molecular profile of dementia and AD progression. Overcoming these existing limitations and performing longitudinal studies would aid in the ability to relate risk factors to disease development and ideally allow for preclinical detection of AD.

Blood-based biomarkers

Multiple blood-based (i.e., serum and plasma) biomarker studies have been conducted to detect cognitive impairment because of AD. Many of the markers studied in blood overlap with those studied in CSF. Blood-based biomarkers are advantageous owing to ease of collection, large obtainable volume, and their ability to be easily implemented into clinical practice. The Blood-Based Biomarker Interest Group was established with the intent to identify novel, reliable biomarkers specific for AD and to overcome existing challenges in biomarker studies.[204] The topic of blood-based biomarkers has been reviewed by several recent excellent reviews.[14, 205, 206] The limitations of the length and focus of this review on CSF biomarkers, however, does not allow us to discuss in greater detail how blood-based biomarkers relate to NVU injury.

Standardization and validity

One major factor affecting the current inability to identify novel, reliable biomarkers in AD involves the lack of standardization of biofluid collection, processing, and analyses across hospitals and research centers. Several programs were initiated to investigate multicenter biomarker comparison including monitoring commercial assay variation between lots, the variability of biomarker measurements across cohorts, the effects of fasting, material of sample collection tubes, centrifugation conditions, time before storage, storage temperature, and repeated freeze/thaw cycles for CSF.[204, 207, 208, 209] Recent efforts are aimed at establishing guidelines for reporting biomarker results to enhance comparability between studies.[208] Until these standardization procedures are implemented into clinical and experimental practice, the field will lack valid comparability across research institutes and patient cohorts.

Targeting vasculature for Alzheimer's disease treatment

There is overwhelming evidence supporting the role of vascular dysfunction in the etiology of AD and the influence of vascular risk factors in the onset and progression of AD.[5] Targeting the vasculature for potential AD treatment has been, however, largely underresearched. Blood–brain barrier breakdown is thought to impact AD development through leakage of toxic blood-derived proteins (i.e., albumin, plasmin, thrombin, and fibrin) into the brain and disruption of CBF.[12] Whether repairing BBB integrity could successfully arrest and/or reverse disease progression in a heterogeneous population of AD patients, as shown for example in animal models of neurodegeneration,[34, 210] remains elusive at present. Here, we discuss briefly some examples of vascular-directed strategies.

Activated Protein C

One potential vasculoprotective compound is activated protein C, which acts through brain endothelium via endothelial protein C receptor and protease-activated receptor-1.[211, 212] Activated protein C stabilizes the BBB through Rac1-dependent stabilization of endothelial cytoskeleton, suppression of proinflammatory cytokines, inhibition of cerebrovascular MMP-9 activity, and inhibition of apoptosis in injured vascular cells. Sealing endothelial barriers, including a leaky BBB, with activated protein C might have beneficial implications for multiple systemic and neurodegenerative conditions involving vascular dysfunction.[210, 211, 212, 213]

Cyclophilin A Inhibition

Activation of the proinflammatory signaling cascade by CypA leads to increased MMP-9 activity resulting in tight junction and basement membrane protein degradation.[34] Cyclophilin A is also known to promote vascular oxidative stress.[213] Thus, CypA inhibitors could be used to prevent oxidative damage[213] and downregulate MMP-9,[34] which could potentially alleviate BBB breakdown in dementias including AD, particularly in APOE ɛ4 carriers.[34, 103]

Fibrinogen/Aβ Inhibition

Fibrinogen binding to Aβ can structurally alter fibrin clots and reduce clot degradation.[214] An inhibitor of this interaction RU-505 was able to restore the fibrin structure and reduce the time for clot degradation in vitro.[214] Further, administration of RU-505 to AD transgenic mice resulted in reduced Aβ plaque burden and associated toxicity as well as improvement in cognitive function.[215]

Autoantibodies

Recently, it was reported that N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor autoantibodies have increased seroprevalence in neuropsychiatric diseases.[216] When APOE knockout transgenic mice with a dysfunctional BBB were injected with N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor autoantibody–positive serum they developed animal correlates of psychotic behavioral impairment, whereas wild-type mice did not, suggesting this seroprevalence could be dependent on an insult to BBB integrity.[216]

Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproduct Inhibitors

Receptor for advanced glycation endproduct is involved in mediating reentry of circulating Aβ across the BBB.[217] Animal studies suggest a multimodal action of Aβ/RAGE-specific inhibitors. Treatment with FPS-ZM1, a RAGE inhibitor, resulted in both decreased inflammatory cytokines and blocked Aβ binding to RAGEs at the BBB, which reduced levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in APPSwe mice.[129] Similarly, the drug pinocembrin, which inhibits RAGE signaling was shown to protect against Aβ toxicity,[218] particularly in relation to reducing BBB injury and improving CBF.[219] A recent clinical trial with the low-dose RAGE inhibitor PF-04494700 slowed cognitive decline after 18 months of treatment.[220] Given the early occurrence of vascular-related events in AD, targets of BBB breakdown and vascular damage have the potential to be considered as alternative treatment options for AD patients or subjects at risk for AD exhibiting vascular dysfunction.

Conclusions and future directions

The lack of preclinical detection is a major limitation for AD treatment efforts. There is a pronounced need in the field to identify molecular, structural, and functional phenotypes associated with defined stages of disease progression that are specific to AD. Clinically, many types of AD-related dementias (i.e., frontotemporal, vascular, mixed, and Lewy-body dementias) in addition to normal aging exhibit both vascular dysfunction and amyloid accumulation. Though amyloid changes occur during preclinical stages of AD, measures of amyloid (CSF levels of Aβ42 and Pittsburgh compound B PET) and tau do not appear to be sensitive enough to predict the onset of cognitive impairment and AD clinical diagnosis. Recently, guidelines have been established for the clinical use of CSF markers Aβ42, pTau181P, and total tau[209] and the identification of early, reliable, and validated AD biomarkers.[221] The Alzheimer's Biomarkers Standardization Initiative is overseeing these efforts with the goal to identify and standardize biomarkers for the diagnostic accuracy of MCI and AD.[209] Reliable biomarkers are essential for (1) early disease detection and intervention and (2) evaluating the effectiveness of clinical trials. It is apparent from existing Aβ treatment efforts that intervening during moderate to advanced AD may be too late in the disease process to effectively reduce and/or prevent pathologic progression and cognitive decline.[222] Recent AD prevention efforts have emphasized the importance for targeting not only neurons but also nonneuronal cell types.[135] Detecting AD during preclinical stages as well as predicting prodromal conversion to AD is essential for successful intervention. Incorporating multiple biomarkers of the NVU with the currently established AD biomarkers, Aβ and tau, could potentially increase the clinical usefulness of CSF biomarkers for early AD-specific diagnosis. The impact of vascular dysfunction in influencing the etiology of sporadic AD is apparent from clinical studies, human AD autopsy reports, neurovascular MRI studies, and transgenic animal model studies. Altogether, research supports a temporal alteration of injury to cells of the NVU in AD. Thus, in light of observed detectable changes, we propose a hypothetical model suggesting differential temporal involvement of cell-specific biomarkers of vascular injury, inflammatory response, and neuronal injury throughout cognitive decline (Figure 3). Additional research is necessary to confirm or amend this general model.
Figure 3

Hypothetical model suggesting the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of cell- and system-specific injury during cognitive decline. Relative CSF levels of vascular injury (red), inflammatory response (green), and neuronal injury (blue) are differentially altered during aging and in the progression from mild dementia (i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI)) to Alzheimer's disease (AD).

In summary, simultaneous detection of molecular biomarkers in combination with structural and functional imaging biomarkers is necessary to identify a biomarker algorithm associated with defined stages of AD development. Future longitudinal CSF and imaging (i.e., BBB and CBF) biomarker studies in human subjects with NCI and/or MCI that incorporate risk factors for AD (i.e., genetic, vascular, environmental, and lifestyle) should continue to interrogate the role of neurovascular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of dementia due to AD and other causes. Elucidating the precise mechanism through which vascular insults influence AD development would be beneficial and might help identify novel biologic targets for drug development and aid in patient-directed treatment efforts.
  218 in total

1.  Neurodegeneration and the neurovascular unit.

Authors:  Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Longitudinal assessment of Aβ and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Victor L Villemagne; Kerryn E Pike; Gaël Chételat; Kathryn A Ellis; Rachel S Mulligan; Pierrick Bourgeat; Uwe Ackermann; Gareth Jones; Cassandra Szoeke; Olivier Salvado; Ralph Martins; Graeme O'Keefe; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Interleukin-1 beta and interleukin-6 are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer's and de novo Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  D Blum-Degen; T Müller; W Kuhn; M Gerlach; H Przuntek; P Riederer
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Microinfarct pathology, dementia, and cognitive systems.

Authors:  Zoe Arvanitakis; Sue E Leurgans; Lisa L Barnes; David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  2014 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Cerebral infarctions and the likelihood of dementia from Alzheimer disease pathology.

Authors:  J A Schneider; R S Wilson; J L Bienias; D A Evans; D A Bennett
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-04-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Recommendations of the Alzheimer's disease-related dementias conference.

Authors:  Thomas J Montine; Walter J Koroshetz; Debra Babcock; Dennis W Dickson; Wendy R Galpern; M Maria Glymour; Steven M Greenberg; Michael L Hutton; David S Knopman; Andrey N Kuzmichev; Jennifer J Manly; Karen S Marder; Bruce L Miller; Creighton H Phelps; William W Seeley; Beth-Anne Sieber; Nina B Silverberg; Margaret Sutherland; Christine L Torborg; Salina P Waddy; Berislav V Zlokovic; Roderick A Corriveau
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  CSF tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231 correlates with cognitive decline in MCI subjects.

Authors:  K Buerger; S J Teipel; R Zinkowski; K Blennow; H Arai; R Engel; K Hofmann-Kiefer; C McCulloch; U Ptok; R Heun; N Andreasen; J DeBernardis; D Kerkman; H- J Moeller; P Davies; H Hampel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Fibrin deposition accelerates neurovascular damage and neuroinflammation in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Justin Paul; Sidney Strickland; Jerry P Melchor
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Effects of a disrupted blood-brain barrier on cholesterol homeostasis in the brain.

Authors:  Ahmed A Saeed; Guillem Genové; Tian Li; Dieter Lütjohann; Maria Olin; Natalia Mast; Irina A Pikuleva; Peter Crick; Yuqin Wang; William Griffiths; Christer Betsholtz; Ingemar Björkhem
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  Folate nutrition and blood-brain barrier dysfunction.

Authors:  Patrick J Stover; Jane Durga; Martha S Field
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  PRDM16 orchestrates angiogenesis via neural differentiation in the developing brain.

Authors:  Libo Su; Xuepei Lei; Hongyan Ma; Chao Feng; Jing Jiang; Jianwei Jiao
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 3.  Cerebral blood flow regulation and neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Kassandra Kisler; Amy R Nelson; Axel Montagne; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Nanomaterial-based blood-brain-barrier (BBB) crossing strategies.

Authors:  Jinbing Xie; Zheyu Shen; Yasutaka Anraku; Kazunori Kataoka; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Melanie D Sweeney; Abhay P Sagare; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  Establishment and Dysfunction of the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Authors:  Zhen Zhao; Amy R Nelson; Christer Betsholtz; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Recent Developments in Understanding Brain Aging: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Ferenc Deak; Willard M Freeman; Zoltan Ungvari; Anna Csiszar; William E Sonntag
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Hyperhomocysteinemia exacerbates Alzheimer's disease pathology by way of the β-amyloid fibrinogen interaction.

Authors:  Y C Chung; A Kruyer; Y Yao; E Feierman; A Richards; S Strickland; E H Norris
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 9.  Brain imaging of neurovascular dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Axel Montagne; Daniel A Nation; Judy Pa; Melanie D Sweeney; Arthur W Toga; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 10.  Neurovascular dysfunction and neurodegeneration in dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Amy R Nelson; Melanie D Sweeney; Abhay P Sagare; Berislav V Zlokovic
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.