Caiguo Zhang1, Yan Liu. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA, caiguo.zhang@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
Cancer remains a major cause of death in the world to date. A variety of anticancer drugs have been used in clinical chemotherapy, acting on the particular oncogenic abnormalities that are responsible for malignant transformation and progression. Interestingly, some of these anticancer drugs are developed from natural sources such as plants, marine organisms, and microorganisms. Over the past decades, a family of naturally occuring molecules, namely sesterterpenoids, has been isolated from different organisms and they exhibit significant potential in the inhibition of tumor cells in vitro, while the molecular targets of these compounds and their functional mechanisms are still obscure. In this review, we summarize and discuss the functions of these sesterterpenoids in the inhibition of cancer cells. Moreover, we also highlight and discuss chemical structure-activity relationships of some compounds, demonstrating their pervasiveness and importance in cancer therapy.
Cancer remains a major cause of death in the world to date. A variety of anticancer drugs have been used in clinical chemotherapy, acting on the particular oncogenic abnormalities that are responsible for malignant transformation and progression. Interestingly, some of these anticancer drugs are developed from natural sources such as plants, marine organisms, and microorganisms. Over the past decades, a family of naturally occuring molecules, namely sesterterpenoids, has been isolated from different organisms and they exhibit significant potential in the inhibition of tumorcells in vitro, while the molecular targets of these compounds and their functional mechanisms are still obscure. In this review, we summarize and discuss the functions of these sesterterpenoids in the inhibition of cancercells. Moreover, we also highlight and discuss chemical structure-activity relationships of some compounds, demonstrating their pervasiveness and importance in cancer therapy.
Introduction: overview of sesterterpenoids and their biological functions
Natural compounds sourced from different organisms exhibit immense structural diversity and possess extensively biological activities against malaria, inflammation, multiple types of cancer, and many infectious diseases. Many of these compounds have been used in clinical therapy, such as etoposide [1], vincristine [2], irinotecan [3], and paclitaxel [4]. As the largest subclass of natural products, accounting for more than 40,000 individual compounds, terpenoids also exhibit diverse biological functions, particularly in the prevention and therapy of multiple cancer types such as skin, lung, pancreatic, colon, and prostate cancer [5, 6]. Based on the number of isoprene units building their parent terpene scaffold, terpenoidscan be generally categorized into hemiterpenoids (C5), monoterpenoids (C10), sesquiterpenoids (C15), diterpenoids (C20), sesterterpenoids (C25), triterpenoids (C30), tetraterpenoids (C40), and polyterpenoids (more than C40) [7, 8]. Among these terpenoids, pharmaceutical effects against tumorcells have been extensively reported in monoterpenoids and triterpenoids [9-11], which exhibit the ability to suppress the growth of cancercells by inducing tumorcell differentiation and apoptosis, and inhibiting tumor angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis [12-14]. In recent years, sesterterpenoids, a small subgroup of terpenoids, have been widely isolated from different organisms, and also exhibit diverse biological properties involving anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anti-feedant, antitubercular, and anti-biofilm formation [7, 8]. Some sesterterpenoids even possess multifunctional activities. For instance, manoalide has both anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial activities [7, 8]. Importantly, many sesterterpenoidscan suppress the growth of cancercells in vitro, and are therefore considered as promising candidates for anticancer drugs [7, 8, 15]. However, their functional mechanisms and molecular targets are barely known to date.Sesterterpenoidscommonly harbor C25 carbon skeletons in their molecular structures. However, some compounds that contain C21–C24 are also grouped into sesterterpenoids, termed as norsesterterpenoids [7, 8]. So far, nearly 1,000 sesterterpenoids have been isolated from terrestrial fungi, lichens, higher plants, insects, and various marine organisms, particularly sponges [8, 16]. Based on the carbocycle numbers contained in their molecular structures, sesterterpenoidscan be broadly classified into 6 subgroups: linear, monocarbocyclic, bicarbocyclic, tricarbocyclic, tetracarbocyclic, and miscellaneous sesterterpenoids [7, 8, 17]. All of these six subclasses of sesterterpenoids have been reported to exhibit significant cytotoxicities against tumorcells.
Linear sesterterpenoids and their cytotoxicities against tumor cells
Although the structures of linear sesterterpenoids are very simple, many of them possess significant cytotoxicities against humantumorcells, with unknown mechanisms of action. Four C22 furanosesterterpenoids isolated from the Ircinia species of sponges, including irciformonins C (1), D (2), 15-acetylirciformonin B (3), and 10-acetylirciformonin B (4) [18], have been reported to significantly inhibit different humancancercells, in which compounds (1) and (2) suppress the growth of colon tumorcells, and compounds (3) and (4) display notable cytotoxic activities against K562, DLD-1, HepG2, and Hep3Bcancercells [8, 19]. Some haslenes (5–7) (from Haslea ostrearia) that house C25 highly branched isoprenoid (HBI) alkenes appear to possess cytostatic effects on humanlung cancercells in vitro [20, 21]. Four furanosesterterpenes isolated from the marine sponge Ircinia oros, ircinin-1 (8) [22], (7E, 12E, 18R, 20Z)-variabilin (9) [23], (8E, 13Z, 18R, 20Z)-strobilinin (10) [23], and (7E, 13Z, 18R, 20Z)-felixinin (11) [23], have been demonstrated to show cytotoxicities against SK–MEL-2 humancancercells by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [8, 22]. Supplementation with ircinin-1 (8) can lead to G1 phase arrest during cell cycle progression, and this process is associated with a marked decrease in protein levels of cyclin D, CDK4 and CDK6 [22]. Ircinin-1can also induce the release of cytochrome c, activation of caspase-3 and caspase-9, and upregulation of Fas and Fas-L [22].Moreover, furospinosulin-1 (12), a marine-sponge-derived furanosesterterpene, exhibits activity against DU145humanprostate cancercells by inhibiting cell proliferation [24]. Subsequent study has demonstrated that furospinosulin-1could suppress the expression of insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2) [24], which is a hypoxia-inducible angiogenic factor and is selectively induced under hypoxic conditions through inhibiting the binding of nuclear proteins to the Sp1 consensus sequence in the IGF-2 promoter region [24] (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Structures of linear sesterterpenoids 1–12
Structures of linear sesterterpenoids 1–12
Monobocyclic sesterterpenoids and their cytotoxicities against tumor cells
A variety of monobocyclicsesterterpenoid compounds have also been demonstrated to exhibit significant cytotoxicities. However, little is known about their functional mechanisms. 24-n-Propyl-O-manoalide (13), a derivative of manoalide, was isolated from Luffariella species [25] and showed significant cytotoxicity against HCT-116cancercells [25]. Some monobocyclic sesterterpenoids isolated from Diacarnus cf. spinopoculum, including ent-muqubilin A (14), ent-epimuqubilin A (15), nuapapuin B (16), epi-nuapapuin B (17), muqubilin B (18), and epi-muqubilin B (19), possess cytotoxicities against NCI-60cells [8, 26]. The diacarnoxides A (20) and B (21), isolated from Diacarnus levii, display cytotoxicities against T47Dbreast tumorcells by inhibiting HIF-1 (hypoxia-inducible factor) activation under hypoxic conditions [27]. It should be noticed here that the activity of HIF-1 is involved in angiogenesis required for tumorcell growth, and thus HIF-1 inhibitors are now under investigation for anticancer effects [28]. The aplysinoplides A–C (22–24) identified in Aplysinopsis digitata have cytotoxicities against P-388 mouseleukemiacells [29]. Luffariolides A–J (25–33), obtained from Luffariella species of marine sponge, exhibit significant cytotoxicities against murinelymphomaL1210cells. Of them, luffariolides A (25), B (26), E (29), and F (30) show the most significant activities [15, 30, 31] (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Structures of monobocyclic sesterterpenoids 13–33
Structures of monobocyclic sesterterpenoids 13–33
Bicarbocyclic sesterterpenoids and their cytotoxicities against tumor cells
Sesterterpenoids with a bicarbocyclic skeleton in many compounds show structures reminiscent of the clerodane and labdanediterpenoids [7, 8]. Kohamaic acid A (34) [32], a compound isolated from Ircinia species of marine sponge, functions as a powerful inhibitor of DNA polymerases [32], which are specialized for DNA replication and repair, and can help cancercells tolerate DNA damage [33]. Some of these enzymes have been developed as viable targets for therapeutic strategies of cancer [33]. The derivatives of kohamaic acid A have also been shown to prevent the growth of HL-60humancancercells through inhibition of DNA replication and repair processes [34]. Several sesterterpenes, including thorectandrols A–D (35–38) [35, 36] and palauolol (39) [37], share similar chemical structures and also display cytotoxicities against a variety of cancercell lines [38]. Palauolol shows significant inhibitory activity against MCF-7, SNB-19, COLO-205, KM12, MOLT-4, H460, A549, LOX, and MALME-3 tumorcell lines, whereas thorectandrols A–D only display weak activities against some of them [38]. Two other sesterterpenoids (40 and 41), which were isolated from the Coscinoderma species of sponge, exhibit moderate cytotoxicities against K562cells [39] (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Structures of bicarbocyclic sesterterpenoids 34–41
Structures of bicarbocyclicsesterterpenoids 34–41
Tricarbocyclic sesterterpenoids and their cytotoxicities against tumor cells
Many sesterterpenoids that possess tricarbocyclic skeleton have also been found to show cytotoxicities. Ophiobolins, including ophiobolin A (42), 6-epi-ophiobolin A (43), 3-anhydro-6-epi-ophiobolin A (44), and ophiobolin I (45), were isolated from Bipolaris species [40]. All of them have cytotoxic activities against A-549, HT-29, and Mec-20 humantumorcells [40]. Mechanistic analysis indicates that ophiobolin A suppresses proliferation and migration of cancercells, and it triggers a paraptosis-like cell death through disrupting internal potassium ion homeostasis [41]. Both 43 and 44 exhibit significant cytotoxicities, whereas ophiobolin I only shows weak activity against tumorcells in comparison with compound 43 [7].Aurorals (46–47) isolated from the sponge Rhabdastrella globostellata were found to exhibit cytotoxicities against KB cells [42]. Seven sesterterpenoids isolated from Petrosaspongia nigra, namely petrosaspongiolides C–H (50–55) and L (56), exhibit cytotoxicities against NSCLC-N6 human bronchopulmunary non-small-cell-lung carcinomacells [43]. The scalarane-related sesterterpenehyatolides A (57) identified in the sponge Hyatella intestinalis has shown activity as a growth inhibitor of several tumorcell lines such as MDA-MB-231, A-549, and HT-29 [44]. Five isomalabaricane-derived natural products from Rhabdastrella globostellata, namely globostelletins C–G (58–62), display different activities against humantumorcell lines such as A549, BGC-823, HCT-8, Bel-7402, and A2780 [45]. A globostelletin-derived compound, namely rhabdastrellic acid A (63), has been shown to have potent inhibition against HL-60cells by inducing apoptosis in M/G2 phase [46]. Further studies indicate that rhabdastrellic acid Acan inhibit proliferation of Hep3B and A549 tumorcells and induce autophagy-associated cell death through blocking the Akt pathway [46]. This process can be negated by transfection with constitutively active Akt plasmid [46] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Structures of tricarbocyclic sesterterpenoids 42–63
Structures of tricarbocyclic sesterterpenoids 42–63
Tetracarbocyclic sesterterpenoids and their cytotoxicities against tumor cells
Tetracarbocyclic sesterterpenoids are emerging as a class of attractive compounds exhibiting significant activities against tumorcells. Scalaranes, the most common sesterterpenoids, have been reported to possess broad and significant cytotoxicities against cancercells [47]. Among them, three scalaranes isolated from Haloragis erecta, namely salmahyrtisol B (64), 3-acetyl- and 19-acetyl-sesterstatin (65 and 66), show significant cytotoxicities against P-388, A-549, and HT-29 tumorcells [47]. A pentacyclicsesterterpene isolated from Haloragis erecta, namely sesterstatin 6 (67), shows significant cytotoxicity against murineleukemia (P-388) and some humantumorcell lines, including BXPC-3, KAT-4, SW1736, NCI-H460, FADU, and DU-145 [48]. Hyatelactam (68), isolated from Hyatella intestinalis, has been shown to inhibit HT-29 tumorcells [44]. Hippospongide B (69), which was isolated from a Hippospongia species of sponge, exhibits significant cytotoxicity against DLD-1, HCT-116, T-47D, and K562tumorcells [49]. Seven other novel scalaranesesterterpenes isolated from Psammocinia species, namely 12-deacetoxy-23-hydroxyscalaradial (70), 12-deacetoxyscalaradial (71), 12-dehydroxy-23-hydroxyhyrtiolide (72), 12-O-acetyl-16-deacetoxy-23-acetoxyscalarafuran (73), 12-deacetoxy-23-hydroxyheteronemin (74), 12-deacetoxy-23-O-acetoxyheteronemin (75), and 12-deacetoxy-23-acetoxy-19-O-acetylscalarin (76), exhibit cytotoxicities against humanrenal cancercell lines (A498, ACHN), pancreatic cancercell lines (MIA-paca, PANC-1), and noncancerous monkey cell line (CV-1) in vitro [50].Hyatelone A (77), 19,20-di-O-acetylhyatelone B (78), and 20-O-acetylhyatolide C (79) posses cytotoxicities against MDA-MB-231, A-549, and HT-29 tumorcells [44]. Beside anti-feedant and anti-inflammatory properties, scalarenedial (80) also displays cytotoxicity against HL-60cells [51]. 12-O-Deacetylnorscalaral B (81), isolated from the sponge Hyatella intestinalis, exhibits activity to inhibit the growth of MDA-MB-231, A-549, and HT-29 tumorcells [44]. Sesterterpene polyols, the mangicols A–G (82–88), which possess unprecedented spirotricyclic skeletal components, show only weak-to-modest cytotoxicities against a variety of cancercell lines in vitro, especially for NCI-60cells [52]. Heteronemin (89), a spongean sesterterpenoid isolated from Hyrtios species, inhibits TNFα-induced NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-B) activation through proteasome inhibition and induces apoptoticcell death [53, 54]. Heteronemin can affect a variety of cellular processes including cell cycle, apoptosis, the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) pathway and the NF-κB signaling cascade, thereby contributing to tumorcell growth inhibition [53, 54]. PHC-2–PHC-7 (90–95), which were isolated from Phyllospongia chondrodes, can increase hemoglobin production in humanchronicmyelogenous leukemiacell line K562 by inducing erythroid differentiation [55]. Neomangicols A (96) and B (97) are cytotoxic to HCT-116humancolon carcinoma in vitro [56].Moreover, scalaradial (80) and cacospongionolide A (98) should be particularly noted; they are isolated from Cacospongia scalaris and Fasciospongia cavernosa marine sponges, respectively, and can significantly inhibit the growth of T47D, A431, HeLa, and HCT116cells with different mechanisms [57]. Detailed studies indicate that treatment of T47Dcells with scalaradial or cacospongionolidecan lead to increased DNA migration and fragmentation [57]. Incubation of HCT116 and HeLacells with scalaradial or cacospongionolide results in increased pro-apoptotic protein levels and the loss of mitochondrial transmembrane [57], implying the activation of apoptosis signaling. These results suggest that scalaradial and cacospongionolide may represent new promising compounds for inhibiting cancercell proliferation (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5
Structures of tetracarbocyclic sesterterpenoids 64–98
Structures of tetracarbocyclic sesterterpenoids 64–98
Miscellaneous sesterterpenoids and their cytotoxicities against tumor cells
Studies also demonstrate that miscellaneous sesterterpenoids exhibit significant cytotoxicities against tumorcells. Salmahyrtisol A (99), which was isolated from Hyrtios erecta, exhibits significant cytotoxicity against murineleukemia (P-388), A-549, and HT-29humancancercells [58]. Terpestacin (100), a miscellaneous compound, was isolated from a Phomopsis species of fungus [59]. Mechanistic study indicates that terpestacin suppresses tumor angiogenesis by targeting UQCRB of mitochondrial complex III in the mitochondrial respiratory chain, thereby causing the inhibition of hypoxia-induced reactive oxygen species and cellular oxygen sensing [59, 60] (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6
Structures of miscellaneous sesterterpenoids 99–100
Structures of miscellaneous sesterterpenoids 99–100
Chemical structure–activity relationships
Some sesterterpenes share similar chemical structures but exhibit distinct cytotoxic activities against cancercells. Thus, it will be interesting and helpful to investigate the relationship between chemical structure and activity. Although many sesterterpenes have been found to show cytotoxicities to tumorcells, it is impossible to compare their activities meaningfully since different cancercell lines were used for different compounds in cytotoxic assays. Here, we track some sesterterpenes isolated by Dr. Liu’s group (from South China Sea Institute of Oceanology) in the past years, and try to find factors affecting their activities (Table 1), thereby providing guidance for modifying the chemical structure of sesterterpenes and obtaining derivatives with more bioactivity in the future.
Table 1
Cytotoxic activities of compounds
Compound
Tumor cell lines
Reference
A549
SK-MEL-2
SK-OV-3
HCT15
XF498
101
29.7
>30
22.1
27.2
24.8
[61]
102
12.3
5.6
9.6
6.5
9.8
[61]
103
10.1
7.8
11.3
9.0
8.9
[61]
104
5.2
4.4
10.2
5.4
5.1
[61]
105
>30
10.7
16.5
>30
10.0
[62]
106
24.1
19.0
18.6
23.5
22.1
[62]
109
19.4
10.9
>30
21.7
>30
[61, 64]
110
24.8
25.7
23.3
23.7
25.9
[61, 64]
111
18.1
7.8
10.0
8.7
24.3
[61, 64]
112
24.1
15.2
7.6
10.5
20.1
[61, 65]
113
8.2
7.5
12.6
19.2
7.8
[61, 65]
114
3.7
9.0
6.6
6.9
5.4
[61, 65]
115
5.0
10.2
9.4
9.8
6.5
[61, 65]
116
3.8
5.9
5.9
4.7
3.7
[61, 65]
117
3.8
8.4
6.2
7.3
5.0
[61, 65]
118
29.7
>30
22.1
27.2
24.8
[61, 65]
119
10.1
7.8
11.3
9.0
9.0
[61, 65]
120
16.89
16.3
26.8
27.5
20.4
[61, 65]
121
15.1
4.1
5.3
5.0
5.5
[61]
122
4.3
3.4
4.0
3.8
3.9
[61]
123
6.3
4.3
6.7
4.9
5.2
[61]
124
16.8
4.8
13.1
5.4
10.5
[61]
125
19.0
3.8
6.9
5.3
5.4
[61]
126
27.1
15.9
26.8
22.3
25.2
[61]
127
>30
13.2
25.9
21.6
>30
[61]
128
>30
10.9
>30
33.0
>30
[64]
129
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
[64]
130
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
[64]
131
>30
>30
>30
>30
>30
[64]
9
>30
7.5
>30
20.5
28.1
[60]
10
7.5
12.3
4.8
11.7
10.5
[60]
Data expressed as ED50 values (μg/mL)
A549 human lung cancer cell line, SK-MEL-2 human skin cancer cancer cell line, SK-OV-3 human ovarian cancer cell line, HCT15 human colon cancer cell line, XF498 human CNS cancer cell line
Cytotoxic activities of compoundsData expressed as ED50 values (μg/mL)A549humanlung cancercell line, SK-MEL-2humanskin cancer cancercell line, SK-OV-3humanovarian cancercell line, HCT15humancolon cancercell line, XF498humanCNS cancercell line
C-21 structures and cytotoxicities against tumor cells
Sarcotin A, a compound isolated from Sarcotragus species, possesses a pair of epimers, C-21R (101) and C-21S (102) [61]. Cytotoxicity analysis indicates that the C-21R epimer is much more cytotoxic than the C-21S epimer. Consistent with this, sarcotin B (103) and isopalinurin (104), and the other two furanosesterterpenes (105 and 106) from Psammocinia species also show much higher cytotoxicity to cancercells in their C-21R epimers than their respective C-21S epimers [62] (Fig. 7)
Fig. 7
Structures of C-21-containing sesterterpenoids 101–106
Structures of C-21-containing sesterterpenoids 101–106
γ-Hydroxybutenolide moiety and cytotoxicities against tumor cells
Some cacospongionolides (98, 107–108) share similar chemical structures with thorectandrols, but exhibit significantly higher cytotoxicities than thorectandrols. Their structure comparison suggests a possible relationship between the γ-hydroxybutenolide moiety and cytotoxicity [57, 63]. Furthermore, some sesterterpenes including a norsesterterpenoidcompound (109), sarcotin I (110) and sarcotin J (111) [61, 64], share similar chemical structures with compound 101. However, their cytotoxicities against cancercells are weaker than compound 101, which contains a γ-hydroxybutenolide moiety. These results clearly demonstrate that the γ-hydroxybutenolide moiety is necessary for the activities of sesterterpenes, and the opening ring of γ-hydroxybutenolide may also cause the decrease in cytotoxicity (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8
Structures of γ-hydroxybutenolide moiety-containing sesterterpenoids 107–111
Structures of γ-hydroxybutenolide moiety-containing sesterterpenoids 107–111
Furan moiety and cytotoxicities against tumor cells
The furan moiety also displays a relevance to cytotoxicity. Comparison of the chemical structures and cytotoxicities of compounds 109 and 112–113 indicates that sesterterpenescontaining a furan moiety have increased cytotoxicity when the furan moiety is oxygenated to form unsaturated lactone or dihydrofuran [63, 64]. Moreover, sesterterpenes 8 and 114–117 containing two furan moieties show higher cytotoxicities than those compounds (118–120) that contain only one furan moiety [65]. That is to say, the more furan rings means stronger cytotoxicities, and the oxidation of a furan ring at an appropriate degree might also improve the cytotoxicities of sesterterpenes (Fig. 9).
Fig. 9
Structures of furan moiety-containing sesterterpenoids 112–120
Structures of furan moiety-containing sesterterpenoids 112–120
Pyrrole moiety and cytotoxicities against tumor cells
The pyrrolosesterterpenes are chemically unique compounds, and incorporate a pyrrole ring to replace the furan ring. The pyrrole moiety also displays correlation with cytotoxicity in sesterterpenes. Comparison of the chemical structures and activities of compound 118 and sesterterpenes 121–126 indicates increased cytotoxicity in compounds harboring a pyrrole moiety [61]. However, sesterterpenescarrying a β-substituted lactam ring (127) instead of the α-substituted one exhibit dramatically decreased activity [61]. Moreover, an alkyl moiety attached on the N-atom of the pyrrole ring is also required for cytotoxicity. For instance, some sesterterpenes (128–131), in which the alkyl moieties are substituted by carboxylic acid sodium, show completely absent cytotoxicity [64] (Fig. 10).
Fig. 10
Structures of pyrrole moiety-containing sesterterpenoids 121–131
Structures of pyrrole moiety-containing sesterterpenoids 121–131
Double bonds and cytotoxicities against tumor cells
The double bonds within the sesterterpenes also have significant effects on cytotoxicity, and the effect is complicated. For instance, comparison of cytotoxicities of two furanosesterterpenes (9 and 10) isolated from a Psammocinia species of marine sponge [60] clearly indicates that compound 10 which carries a double bond in Δ12,13 has much higher cytotoxicity than 9 [60]. Furthermore, the configuration of double bonds also plays important roles for the activities of compounds. Some E-difuranosesterterpenes (115 and 117) have been reported to display lower activities than their respective Z-difuranosesterterpenes (114 and 116) [65]. The different position of double bonds may lead to different activities. For instance, compounds 105 and 106 share similar structures, but have different positions of double bonds. Interestingly, compound 105 exhibits higher cytotoxicity than 106 in SK-MEL-2, SK-OV-3, and XF498tumorcells [62]. These results indicate that the Δ8(10),11(12) conjugated double bonds may increase cytotoxicity, whereas the Δ15(16),17(18) double bonds possibly decrease activity. Taken together, the characteristics of double bonds including number, position and configuration show significant effects on the cytotoxicity of sesterterpenes.
Challenges and future directions
One challenge for cancerchemotherapy is the lack of effective antitumor drugs. The traditional chemotherapeutic medicines cannot selectively kill cancercells, and consequently cause serious side effects including immunological, neurological, metabolic, and infectious diseases. Developing compounds from natural sourcea as anticancer drugs is a new strategy to overcome or decrease these side effects. Interestingly, many sesterterpenoids from natural sources have been reported to exhibit strong cytotoxicities by inhibiting cancercell proliferation and/or inducing cell death. These sesterterpenoids are attracting more interest and may represent new promising compounds in cancer therapy.Although many sesterterpenoids have been reported to exhibit significant cytotoxicities in vitro, few studies have provided insights into their molecular targets and mechanisms. Thus, it is necessary to further explore studies on signal transduction involved in cancer pathways, the in vivo physiological roles and the systematic structure–activity relationships of these compounds. The detailed mechanistic understanding of sesterterpenoids may provide critical insights into future development and investigation of cancer therapeutics with higher specificity and selectivity. The commendable understanding of relationship between structures and activities can, in turn, help us to chemically modify and synthesize powerful compounds against tumorcells. Furthermore, we anticipate establishing a sesterterpenoidcompound-bank to screen effective and specificcompounds against various diseases, including but not limited to cancer. Sesterterpenoids may be used in combination with other chemotherapeutic drugs to increase effectiveness and decrease doses of individual compounds, therefore reducing side effects.
Authors: Jin Li; Bo Xu; Jinrong Cui; Zhiwei Deng; Nicole J de Voogd; Peter Proksch; Wenhan Lin Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Hye Jin Jung; Joong Sup Shim; Jiyong Lee; Young Mi Song; Ki Chung Park; Seung Hoon Choi; Nam Doo Kim; Jeong Hyeok Yoon; Paul T Mungai; Paul T Schumacker; Ho Jeong Kwon Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-02-09 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: M Bury; A Girault; V Mégalizzi; S Spiegl-Kreinecker; V Mathieu; W Berger; A Evidente; A Kornienko; P Gailly; C Vandier; R Kiss Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Halil I Ciftci; Mustafa Can; Doha E Ellakwa; Salih C Suner; Mohamed A Ibrahim; Ayhan Oral; Nazim Sekeroglu; Barış Özalp; Masami Otsuka; Mikako Fujita; Mustafa Alparslan; Mohamed O Radwan Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Ancheng C Huang; Satria A Kautsar; Young J Hong; Marnix H Medema; Andrew D Bond; Dean J Tantillo; Anne Osbourn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 12.779