| Literature DB >> 25878715 |
Sapan Kumar Sharma1, Nandini Gautam2, Narender Singh Atri3.
Abstract
Under present experiments, EPS and IPS production, monosaccharide composition, and antioxidant activities of C. gracilis were studied for the first time under submerged culture conditions. Effect of different factors on polysaccharides production was studied by orthogonal experiments using one-factor-at-a-time method. Incubation of culture in the medium with capacity 200 mL (675.12 ± 5.01 and 385.20 ± 5.01 mg/L), rotation speed 150 rpm (324.62 ± 3.32 and 254.62 ± 4.62 mg/L), 6-day culture incubation time (445.24 ± 1.11, 216.60 ± 1.71 mg/L), pH 6.0 (374.81 ± 2.52 and 219.45 ± 2.59 mg/L), and temperature 23°C (405.24 ± 1.11 and 215.60 ± 1.71 mg/L) produced higher EPS and IPS, respectively. Maximum EPS and IPS production was observed in the medium supplemented with glucose as a carbon source (464.82 ± 2.12 and 264.42 ± 2.62 mg/L) and yeast extract as a nitrogen source (465.21 ± 3.11 and 245.17 ± 3.24 mg/L), respectively. Carbon to nitrogen ratio for maximum EPS and IPS production was observed as 10 : 1 (395.29 ± 2.15 and 235.62 ± 1.40 mg/L), respectively. Glucose was found to be the major monosaccharide (62.15 ± 7.33%). Both EPS and IPS of C. gracilis showed significant DPPH radical scavenging activity, ABTS radical scavenging activity, reducing power, and iron chelating activity.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25878715 PMCID: PMC4387898 DOI: 10.1155/2015/462864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effect of different factors on EPS and IPS yield in submerged culture of C. gracilis.
| Sources | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Medium capacity/mL | ||
| 50 | 302.17 ± 4.46a | 122.13 ± 5.46a |
| 100 | 450.10 ± 5.46a | 203.13 ± 4.48a |
| 150 | 449.12 ± 4.62a | 204.62 ± 4.62a |
| 200 | 675.12 ± 4.01b | 385.20 ± 3.00b |
| 250 | 403.11 ± 5.46a | 199.13 ± 5.46a |
| Rotation speed (rpm) | ||
| 50 | 213.17 ± 2.46a | 121.12 ± 1.62a |
| 100 | 244.62 ± 2.12a | 152.13 ± 5.46a |
| 125 | 255.20 ± 2.51a | 185.20 ± 5.01a |
| 150 | 324.62 ± 3.32b | 254.62 ± 4.62b |
| 175 | 283.13 ± 2.49a | 198.13 ± 5.46a |
| 200 | 187.20 ± 2.01a | 125.20 ± 5.01a |
| Incubation time/d | ||
| 2 | 253.10 ± 3.16a | 123.12 ± 3.42a |
| 3 | 265.22 ± 2.21a | 145.17 ± 3.01abc |
| 4 | 314.12 ± 1.32a | 164.69 ± 2.02abc |
| 5 | 353.19 ± 4.16ad | 173.63 ± 2.46b |
| 6 | 445.24 ± 1.11ab | 216.60 ± 1.71bc |
| 7 | 304.82 ± 2.12a | 164.42 ± 2.62abc |
| 8 | 253.71 ± 1.43a | 157.49 ± 1.46abc |
| 9 | 245.24 ± 4.11ac | 149.22 ± 1.91abc |
| 10 | 204.52 ± 1.63acd | 134.02 ± 2.12abc |
| pH | ||
| 3.0 | 324.11 ± 1.15a | 154.60 ± 2.12a |
| 4.0 | 343.14 ± 1.19a | 173.61 ± 2.16ab |
| 5.0 | 355.29 ± 2.15a | 185.62 ± 1.49ab |
| 6.0 | 374.81 ± 2.52ab | 219.45 ± 2.59b |
| 7.0 | 353.79 ± 2.44a | 197.59 ± 5.16ab |
| 8.0 | 247.19 ± 2.11ac | 169.12 ± 4.93ab |
| Temperature | ||
| 20 | 362.19 ± 2.16a | 172.63 ± 2.33a |
| 22 | 405.24 ± 1.11b | 215.60 ± 1.71ab |
| 25 | 394.82 ± 2.55c | 162.42 ± 2.62a |
| 27 | 253.71 ± 1.46d | 159.49 ± 1.46a |
| 30 | 209.24 ± 4.91e | 147.22 ± 1.91a |
| 35 | 103.19 ± 4.10f | 63.10 ± 2.46ac |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE and the same alphabets in the same column are not statistically significant according to Tukey's test for multiple comparisons with P < 0.05 for different conditions as mentioned in the table.
Effect of different factors on EPS and IPS yield in submerged culture of C. gracilis.
| Factors | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon sources | ||
| Mannitol | 319.12 ± 1.82a | 164.69 ± 2.02a |
| Galactose | 353.19 ± 3.19a | 173.63 ± 2.46a |
| Sucrose | 305.24 ± 1.11a | 216.60 ± 1.71a |
| Glucose | 464.82 ± 2.12ab | 264.42 ± 2.62ab |
| Maltose | 253.71 ± 1.43a | 157.49 ± 1.46a |
| Fructose | 245.24 ± 4.11ac | 149.22 ± 1.91ac |
| Nitrogen source | ||
| Yeast extract | 465.21 ± 3.11a | 245.17 ± 3.24a |
| Peptone | 324.12 ± 1.32a | 164.69 ± 2.69a |
| NaNO2 | 345.24 ± 2.17a | 146.60 ± 1.71a |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 304.82 ± 2.12a | 104.42 ± 2.62a |
| L-arginine HCL | 263.71 ± 3.43a | 107.49 ± 3.46a |
| DL-ascorbic acid | 255.24 ± 4.11b | 99.22 ± 1.91b |
| C/N ratio | ||
| 40 : 1 | 117.70 ± 1.07a | 97.79 ± 1.59a |
| 30 : 1 | 324.11 ± 1.71a | 154.60 ± 2.32a |
| 20 : 1 | 343.14 ± 1.19a | 173.61 ± 2.16a |
| 10 : 1 | 395.29 ± 2.15b | 235.62 ± 1.40b |
| 5 : 1 | 374.81 ± 2.52a | 219.45 ± 2.59a |
| 1 : 1 | 353.79 ± 2.44a | 197.59 ± 5.16a |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE and the same alphabets in the same column are not statistically significant according to Tukey's test for multiple comparisons with P < 0.05 for different conditions as mentioned in the table.
Monosaccharide composition (mean ± SE) of polysaccharides in C. gracilis.
| Monosaccharides | (%) |
|---|---|
| Xylose | 21.14 ± 5.19 |
| Glucose | 62.15 ± 7.33 |
| Rhamnose | 36.81 ± 4.57 |
| Mannose | 13.76 ± 2.44 |
| Galactose | 0.10 ± 0.0 |
Results obtained for orthogonal design.
| Experimental group | Temperature (°C) | pH | Rotation speed/min | Culture time/d | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 316.83 ± 2.35 | 276.83 ± 1.65 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 465.17 ± 12.16 | 315.10 ± 12.16 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 384.25 ± 16.10 | 324.20 ± 16.10 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 618.49 ± 34.15 | 398.19 ± 34.15 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 598.69 ± 14.10 | 408.60 ± 14.10 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 648.69 ± 9.18 | 441.61 ± 7.58 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 248.11 ± 44.47 | 198.20 ± 14.07 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 362.11 ± 3.75 | 252.18 ± 7.75 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 206.76 ± 58.91 | 176.76 ± 18.01 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 11.26 | 9.28 | 15.26 | 14.89 | ||
|
| 24.10 | 14.60 | 13.90 | 15.10 | ||
|
| 11.15 | 9.05 | 14.15 | 14.15 | ||
|
| 12.17 | 4.67 | 0.82 | 2.69 | ||
|
| 451.56 | 351.84 | 424.43 | 327.16 | ||
|
| 678.59 | 576.19 | 622.09 | 478.59 | ||
|
| 302.11 | 342.17 | 362.71 | 444.11 | ||
|
| 389.38 | 84.08 | 25.38 | 92.18 | ||
K 1 = ∑ EPS at culture factor level 1/3. K 1 * = ∑ IPS yield at culture factor level 1/3.
Figure 1(a) Wild fruit body of C. gracilis on Hymenoptera insect. (b) Four-day-old mycelium on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. (c) DPPH scavenging activity of EPS and IPS. (d) ABTS radical scavenging activity of EPS and IPS. (e) Reducing power of EPS and IPS. (f) Iron chelating activity of EPS and IPS.
EC50values of EPS and IPS.
| EC50 | EPS (mg/mL) | IPS (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| DPPH radical scavenging activity | 7.32 ± 0.09 | 6.79 ± 0.04 |
| ABTS radical scavenging activity | 7.08 ± 0.32 | 5.11 ± 0.22 |
| Reducing power | 6.96 ± 0.22 | 5.33 ± 0.27 |
| Iron chelating activity | 1.64 ± 0.41 | 1.49 ± 0.21 |