| Literature DB >> 25878715 |
Sapan Kumar Sharma1, Nandini Gautam2, Narender Singh Atri3.
Abstract
Under present experiments, EPS andEntities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25878715 PMCID: PMC4387898 DOI: 10.1155/2015/462864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Effect of different factors on EPS and IPS yield in submerged culture of C. gracilis.
| Sources | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Medium capacity/mL | ||
| 50 | 302.17 ± 4.46a | 122.13 ± 5.46a |
| 100 | 450.10 ± 5.46a | 203.13 ± 4.48a |
| 150 | 449.12 ± 4.62a | 204.62 ± 4.62a |
| 200 | 675.12 ± 4.01b | 385.20 ± 3.00b |
| 250 | 403.11 ± 5.46a | 199.13 ± 5.46a |
| Rotation speed (rpm) | ||
| 50 | 213.17 ± 2.46a | 121.12 ± 1.62a |
| 100 | 244.62 ± 2.12a | 152.13 ± 5.46a |
| 125 | 255.20 ± 2.51a | 185.20 ± 5.01a |
| 150 | 324.62 ± 3.32b | 254.62 ± 4.62b |
| 175 | 283.13 ± 2.49a | 198.13 ± 5.46a |
| 200 | 187.20 ± 2.01a | 125.20 ± 5.01a |
| Incubation time/d | ||
| 2 | 253.10 ± 3.16a | 123.12 ± 3.42a |
| 3 | 265.22 ± 2.21a | 145.17 ± 3.01abc |
| 4 | 314.12 ± 1.32a | 164.69 ± 2.02abc |
| 5 | 353.19 ± 4.16ad | 173.63 ± 2.46b |
| 6 | 445.24 ± 1.11ab | 216.60 ± 1.71bc |
| 7 | 304.82 ± 2.12a | 164.42 ± 2.62abc |
| 8 | 253.71 ± 1.43a | 157.49 ± 1.46abc |
| 9 | 245.24 ± 4.11ac | 149.22 ± 1.91abc |
| 10 | 204.52 ± 1.63acd | 134.02 ± 2.12abc |
| pH | ||
| 3.0 | 324.11 ± 1.15a | 154.60 ± 2.12a |
| 4.0 | 343.14 ± 1.19a | 173.61 ± 2.16ab |
| 5.0 | 355.29 ± 2.15a | 185.62 ± 1.49ab |
| 6.0 | 374.81 ± 2.52ab | 219.45 ± 2.59b |
| 7.0 | 353.79 ± 2.44a | 197.59 ± 5.16ab |
| 8.0 | 247.19 ± 2.11ac | 169.12 ± 4.93ab |
| Temperature | ||
| 20 | 362.19 ± 2.16a | 172.63 ± 2.33a |
| 22 | 405.24 ± 1.11b | 215.60 ± 1.71ab |
| 25 | 394.82 ± 2.55c | 162.42 ± 2.62a |
| 27 | 253.71 ± 1.46d | 159.49 ± 1.46a |
| 30 | 209.24 ± 4.91e | 147.22 ± 1.91a |
| 35 | 103.19 ± 4.10f | 63.10 ± 2.46ac |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE and the same alphabets in the same column are not statistically significant according to Tukey's test for multiple comparisons with P < 0.05 for different conditions as mentioned in the table.
Effect of different factors on EPS and IPS yield in submerged culture of C. gracilis.
| Factors | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon sources | ||
| Mannitol | 319.12 ± 1.82a | 164.69 ± 2.02a |
| Galactose | 353.19 ± 3.19a | 173.63 ± 2.46a |
| Sucrose | 305.24 ± 1.11a | 216.60 ± 1.71a |
| Glucose | 464.82 ± 2.12ab | 264.42 ± 2.62ab |
| Maltose | 253.71 ± 1.43a | 157.49 ± 1.46a |
| Fructose | 245.24 ± 4.11ac | 149.22 ± 1.91ac |
| Nitrogen source | ||
| Yeast extract | 465.21 ± 3.11a | 245.17 ± 3.24a |
| Peptone | 324.12 ± 1.32a | 164.69 ± 2.69a |
| NaNO2 | 345.24 ± 2.17a | 146.60 ± 1.71a |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 304.82 ± 2.12a | 104.42 ± 2.62a |
| L-arginine HCL | 263.71 ± 3.43a | 107.49 ± 3.46a |
| DL-ascorbic acid | 255.24 ± 4.11b | 99.22 ± 1.91b |
| C/N ratio | ||
| 40 : 1 | 117.70 ± 1.07a | 97.79 ± 1.59a |
| 30 : 1 | 324.11 ± 1.71a | 154.60 ± 2.32a |
| 20 : 1 | 343.14 ± 1.19a | 173.61 ± 2.16a |
| 10 : 1 | 395.29 ± 2.15b | 235.62 ± 1.40b |
| 5 : 1 | 374.81 ± 2.52a | 219.45 ± 2.59a |
| 1 : 1 | 353.79 ± 2.44a | 197.59 ± 5.16a |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE and the same alphabets in the same column are not statistically significant according to Tukey's test for multiple comparisons with P < 0.05 for different conditions as mentioned in the table.
Monosaccharide composition (mean ± SE) of polysaccharides in C. gracilis.
| Monosaccharides | (%) |
|---|---|
| Xylose | 21.14 ± 5.19 |
| Glucose | 62.15 ± 7.33 |
| Rhamnose | 36.81 ± 4.57 |
| Mannose | 13.76 ± 2.44 |
| Galactose | 0.10 ± 0.0 |
Results obtained for orthogonal design.
| Experimental group | Temperature (°C) | pH | Rotation speed/min | Culture time/d | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 316.83 ± 2.35 | 276.83 ± 1.65 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 465.17 ± 12.16 | 315.10 ± 12.16 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 384.25 ± 16.10 | 324.20 ± 16.10 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 618.49 ± 34.15 | 398.19 ± 34.15 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 598.69 ± 14.10 | 408.60 ± 14.10 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 648.69 ± 9.18 | 441.61 ± 7.58 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 248.11 ± 44.47 | 198.20 ± 14.07 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 362.11 ± 3.75 | 252.18 ± 7.75 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 206.76 ± 58.91 | 176.76 ± 18.01 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 11.26 | 9.28 | 15.26 | 14.89 | ||
|
| 24.10 | 14.60 | 13.90 | 15.10 | ||
|
| 11.15 | 9.05 | 14.15 | 14.15 | ||
|
| 12.17 | 4.67 | 0.82 | 2.69 | ||
|
| 451.56 | 351.84 | 424.43 | 327.16 | ||
|
| 678.59 | 576.19 | 622.09 | 478.59 | ||
|
| 302.11 | 342.17 | 362.71 | 444.11 | ||
|
| 389.38 | 84.08 | 25.38 | 92.18 | ||
K 1 = ∑ EPS at culture factor level 1/3. K 1 * = ∑ IPS yield at culture factor level 1/3.
Figure 1(a) Wild fruit body of C. gracilis on Hymenoptera insect. (b) Four-day-old mycelium on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. (c) DPPH scavenging activity of EPS and IPS. (d) ABTS radical scavenging activity of EPS and IPS. (e) Reducing power of EPS and IPS. (f) Iron chelating activity of EPS and IPS.
EC50values of EPS and IPS.
| EC50 | EPS (mg/mL) | IPS (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| DPPH radical scavenging activity | 7.32 ± 0.09 | 6.79 ± 0.04 |
| ABTS radical scavenging activity | 7.08 ± 0.32 | 5.11 ± 0.22 |
| Reducing power | 6.96 ± 0.22 | 5.33 ± 0.27 |
| Iron chelating activity | 1.64 ± 0.41 | 1.49 ± 0.21 |