| Literature DB >> 31820136 |
Abstract
Cordyceps cicadae is a well-known traditional Chinese medicine for treating palpitations and eye diseases. It contains several bioactive compounds such as adenosine, N6-(2-hydroxyethyl)-adenosine (HEA), and polysaccharide. Those bioactive compounds have been reported to perform anti-oxidation and anti-inflammatory properties and provide renal protection. In this study, we researched different fermentation conditions in order to enhance the biomass, adenosine, HEA, and polysaccharide productions of C. cicadae NTTU 868. Solid fermentation was carried out with different grain substrates (barley, oat, rice and wheat). Various submerged fermentation scales were used to produce the C. cicadae NTTU 868 mycelium. The results of solid fermentation revealed that C. cicadae NTTU 868 produced higher adenosine and HEA concentrations in oat rather than in other substrates. C. cicadae NTTU 868 mycelium had obtained the highest concentrations of adenosine and HEA on Day 2 as using the small-scale submerged fermentation. Furthermore, potato dextrose broth with extra 0.2% of yeast extract was able to result in higher HEA concentration. In conclusion, using submerged fermentation to culture C. cicadae NTTU 868 resulted in more efficient adenosine, HEA, and polysaccharide productions than using solid-fermentation, especially when 0.2% of yeast extract was used in the PDB. Importantly, this can be easily scaled-up in the fermentation industry.Entities:
Keywords: Adenosine; Cordyceps cicadae NTTU 868; N6-(2-hydroxyethyl)-adenosine (HEA); Polysaccharide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31820136 PMCID: PMC6901654 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-019-0892-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1Fruit bodies of C. cicadae NTTU 868 fermented with different grain substrates a barley; b oat; c rice; d wheat
The biomass and adenosine, HEA and polysaccharide concentration in solid-fermented C. cicadae NTTU 868 fruit bodies with different grain substrates
| Substrates | Biomass (g) | Adenosine (mg/kg biomass) | HEA (mg/kg biomass) | Polysaccharide (g/kg biomass) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barley | 2.56 ± 1.63b | 893.5 ± 282.2ab | 930.7 ± 24.5b | 21.2 ± 2.5a |
| Oat | 4.53 ± 1.93bc | 1176.9 ± 120.6b | 1034.2 ± 112.6b | 24.4 ± 1.2a |
| Rice | 5.44 ± 0.43c | 851.0 ± 103.2ab | 713.4 ± 87.4a | 21.4 ± 2.2a |
| Wheat | 0.35 ± 0.14a | 730.4 ± 153.6a | 1100.2 ± 124.2b | 21.2 ± 0.4a |
The data is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
a,bDifferent letters indicate significantly different values according to a one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple test (p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Growth curve of submerged-fermented C. cicadae NTTU 868 mycelium and the change of adenosine and HEA concentration: a dry mycelium biomass; b adenosine, HEA and polysaccharide concentration by using HPLC analysis. The data is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
Fig. 3Time course of adenosine, HEA and polysaccharide contents under pilot-up fermentation of C. cicadae NTTU 868
Effect of different basal mediums on adenosine, HEA and polysaccharide in 100-mL submerged-fermented C. cicadae NTTU868 mycelium
| Substrates | Adenosine (mg/kg biomass) | HEA (mg/kg biomass) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 | Day 10 | Day 2 | Day 10 | |
| Barley | 75.8 ± 41.2a | 442.4 ± 16.4b | 45.1 ± 13.0a | 114.0 ± 6.6b |
| Oat | 102.9 ± 44.9a | 529.3 ± 79.3b | 3.9 ± 1.6a | 102.8 ± 11.7b |
| Rice | 17.5 ± 12.3a | 225.5 ± 52.7b | 1.2 ± 3.0a | 9.2 ± 7.8a |
| PDB | 1601.6 ± 295.7a | 1669.3 ± 199.0a | 1359.5 ± 176.8a | 903.6 ± 509.2b |
The data is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
a,bDifferent letters indicate significantly different values according to a one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple test (p < 0.05)
Effect of carbon, nitrogen and mineral supplement on adenosine, HEA and polysaccharide contents of 100-mL submerged-fermented C. cicadae NTTU868 mycelium
| Substrates | Adenosine (mg/kg biomass) | HEA (mg/kg biomass) | Polysaccharide (g/kg biomass) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extra carbon sources | |||
| Dextrose | 1095 ± 16a | 473 ± 7a | 16.2 ± 0.9a |
| Mannitol | 884 ± 356a | 425 ± 57a | 15.6 ± 0.8a |
| Sucrose | 964 ± 274a | 386 ± 82b | 15.9 ± 0.9a |
| Extra nitrogen sources | |||
| MSG | 607 ± 46a | 1335 ± 1230a | 15.9 ± 1.7a |
| Peptone | 1093 ± 22b | 770 ± 57a | 17.6 ± 1.6a |
| Yeast extract | 1266 ± 339b | 1171 ± 1315a | 16.8 ± 1.1a |
| Extra mineral supplement | |||
| KCl | 1038 ± 49b | 481 ± 118c | 16.4 ± 0.7b |
| MgCl2 | 960 ± 143b | 279 ± 6b | 15.9 ± 0.6ab |
| FeCl3 | 344 ± 57a | 109 ± 5a | 15.0 ± 0.4a |
The data is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
MSG monosodium glutamate, KCl potassium chloride, MgCl magnesium chloride, FeCl ferric chloride
a,bDifferent letters indicate significantly different values according to a one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple test (p < 0.05)
Effect of different concentration of dextrose, yeast extract and KCl on adenosine, HEA and polysaccharide in 100-mL submerged-fermented C. cicadae NTTU868 mycelium
| Sources | Adenosine (mg/kg biomass) | HEA (mg/kg biomass) | Polysaccharide (g/kg biomass) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extra dextrose (%) | |||
| 0.00 | 1080 ± 56b | 533 ± 33c | 20.5 ± 1.1b |
| 0.04 | 1020 ± 56b | 472 ± 15bc | 18.9 ± 2.0ab |
| 0.20 | 964 ± 90b | 432 ± 59b | 17.6 ± 0.2a |
| 1.00 | 656 ± 125b | 337 ± 24a | 19.4 ± 0.9ab |
| Extra yeast extract (%) | |||
| 0.00 | 1080 ± 56a | 533 ± 33a | 20.5 ± 1.1a |
| 0.04 | 1134 ± 81a | 544 ± 38a | 21.3 ± 4.0a |
| 0.20 | 1157 ± 376a | 764 ± 120b | 20.8 ± 2.5a |
| 1.00 | 1169 ± 22a | 634 ± 137ab | 22.4 ± 6.1a |
| Extra KCl (%) | |||
| 0.00 | 1080 ± 56c | 533 ± 33b | 20.5 ± 1.1a |
| 0.01 | 1035 ± 60c | 479 ± 40b | 21.2 ± 1.0a |
| 0.05 | 841 ± 38b | 474 ± 81b | 20.0 ± 1.6a |
| 0.25 | 670 ± 56a | 356 ± 51a | 21.6 ± 0.7a |
The data is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3)
KCl potassium chloride
a,b,cDifferent letters indicate significantly different values according to a one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple test (p < 0.05)
The difference of adenosine, HEA and polysaccharide production of C. cicadae NTTU 868 mycelium between different cultivation volume submerged fermentation
| Culture scale (mL) | Adenosine (mg/kg biomass) | HEA (mg/kg biomass) | Polysaccharide (g/kg biomass) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 1157 ± 376 | 764 ± 120 | 20.7 ± 2.5 |
| 1500 | 240 ± 31 | 1157 ± 449 | 14.3 ± 0.4 |
The data is presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3)