| Literature DB >> 26694071 |
Sapan Kumar Sharma1, Nandini Gautam2, Narender Singh Atri3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cordyceps cicadae is known as Jin Chan Hua in Traditional Chinese Medicine and known to possess different pharmacological activities. Presently, it was collected from the wild and isolated. Mycelial culture was optimized for extraction of polysaccharides under submerged culture conditions. Besides antioxidant, antibacterial activities of extracted polysaccharides were tested for first time.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26694071 PMCID: PMC4689043 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0967-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1a Wild fruitbody of C. cicadae, b 6 days old mycelium, c DPPH scavenging activity of EPS and IPS, d ABTS radical scavenging activity of EPS and IPS, e Reducing power of EPS and IPS, f Iron chelating activity of EPS and IPS
Effect of different factors on polysaccharides (EPS and IPS) yield in submerged culture of C. cicadae
| Sources | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Medium capacity/ml | ||
| 50 | 312.14 ± 2.41c | 111.23 ± 2.47a |
| 100 | 350.18 ± 2.41d | 193.13 ± 2.12b |
| 150 | 410.11 ± 4.68d | 234.61 ± 2.11b |
| 200 | 455.19 ± 2.21e | 276.16 ± 2.10c |
| 250 | 413.14 ± 2.17d | 229.13 ± 1.41a |
| Rotation speed (rpm) | ||
| 50 | 211.14 ± 1.52b | 110.11 ± 1.15a |
| 100 | 239.12 ± 1.16b | 134.12 ± 2.16a |
| 125 | 268.15 ± 1.51b | 152.21 ± 2.21a |
| 150 | 274.11 ± 2.12c | 192.10 ± 2.09 b |
| 175 | 282.10 ± 1.99b | 199.14 ± 1.66b |
| 200 | 172.19 ± 1.26a | 175.21 ± 1.21a |
| Incubation time/d | ||
| 2 | 187.12 ± 1.26b | 111.10 ± 1.49a |
| 3 | 215.21 ± 1.27b | 135.11 ± 2.12a |
| 4 | 234.10 ± 1.18c | 164.16 ± 1.92a |
| 5 | 265.12 ± 1.79c | 176.17 ± 1.42a |
| 6 | 315.20 ± 2.15d | 213.67 ± 2.11b |
| 7 | 301.17 ± 2.10c | 204.51 ± 1.98a |
| 8 | 213.11 ± 2.43b | 167.19 ± 1.46a |
| 9 | 215.26 ± 1.91b | 142.15 ± 1.91a |
| 10 | 192.11 ± 2.63b | 138.32 ± 2.12a |
| pH | ||
| 3.0 | 221.13 ± 2.12c | 124.21 ± 1.25a |
| 4.0 | 243.24 ± 2.99c | 143.11 ± 1.26a |
| 5.0 | 257.22 ± 1.35c | 182.12 ± 1.39a |
| 6.0 | 274.11 ± 2.52c | 201.19 ± 1.60b |
| 7.0 | 253.31 ± 2.44c | 192.59 ± 1.26a |
| 8.0 | 231.10 ± 1.12b | 171.10 ± 1.33a |
| Temperature | ||
| 20 | 312.18 ± 2.95c | 172.63 ± 2.33a |
| 23 | 395.29 ± 2.16d | 215.60 ± 1.71b |
| 25 | 390.81 ± 2.55c | 162.42 ± 2.62a |
| 27 | 243.23 ± 3.41b | 159.49 ± 1.46a |
| 30 | 212.20 ± 2.90b | 147.22 ± 1.91a |
| 33 | 93.19 ± 2.61a | 063.10 ± 2.46a |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE and the same alphabets in the same column are not statistically significant according to Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons with < 0.05 for different conditions as mentioned in the table
Effect of different carbon and nitrogen sources on EPS and IPS yield in submerged culture of C. cicadae
| Factors | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon sources | ||
| Mannitol | 302.26 ± 3.82c | 144.71 ± 1.92a |
| Galactose | 213.10 ± 2.29c | 141.13 ± 1.46a |
| Sucrose | 335.12 ± 2.81c | 209.10 ± 2.11b |
| Glucose | 354.22 ± 1.62d | 214.40 ± 2.18b |
| Maltose | 247.19 ± 1.48b | 144.46 ± 1.46a |
| Fructose | 211.34 ± 1.19b | 142.20 ± 2.31a |
| Nitrogen source | ||
| Yeast Extract | 365.21 ± 3.82d | 215.16 ± 3.74b |
| Peptone | 424.82 ± 2.39c | 264.19 ± 2.92a |
| NaNO2 | 305.17 ± 2.12c | 148.15 ± 2.79a |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 293.14 ± 2.15c | 124.12 ± 2.65a |
| L – Arginine HCL | 254.33 ± 2.13b | 99.49 ± 2.16a |
| DL – Ascorbic Acid | 206.19 ± 1.98b | 92.22 ± 2.11a |
| Mineral Sources | ||
| CaCl2 | 231.17 ± 2.79c | 116.63 ± 2.12a |
| CoCl2.6H2O | 242.16 ± 2.45d | 123.62 ± 1.98b |
| FeSO4.7H2O | 264.13 ± 1.11c | 144.42 ± 2.09a |
| KH2PO4 | 313.31 ± 2.49b | 187.10 ± 2.36a |
| K2HPO4 | 275.21 ± 2.13b | 162.32 ± 2.18a |
| MnCl2.6H2O | 210.26 ± 1.92b | 112.83 ± 2.90a |
| C/N ratio | ||
| 40:1 | 111.15 ± 2.07a | 92.12 ± 2.13a |
| 30:1 | 229.18 ± 2.32c | 142.16 ± 2.57a |
| 20:1 | 243.94 ± 2.79c | 179.15 ± 2.36a |
| 10:1 | 295.17 ± 2.15c | 232.11 ± 2.45b |
| 5:1 | 274.17 ± 2.91c | 209.40 ± 1.99b |
| 1:1 | 253.19 ± 2.64c | 185.16 ± 2.37a |
Values are expressed as mean ± SE and the same alphabets in the same column are not statistically significant according to Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons with < 0.05 for different conditions as mentioned in the table
Monosaccharide composition of polysaccharides in C. cicadae
| Monosaccharides | (%) |
|---|---|
| Xylose | 20.12 ± 2.29 |
| Glucose | 63.10 ± 4.15 |
| Rhamnose | 39.11 ± 3.57 |
| Mannose | 15.16 ± 1.34 |
| Arabinose | 2.05 ± 0.37 |
| Galacturonic acid | 0.06 ± 0.0 |
| Galactose | 0.12 ± 0.0 |
Results obtained for orthogonal design by one factor at a time method
| Experimental group | Temperature (°C) | pH | Rotary speed/r · min − 1 | Culture time/d | EPS (mg/L) | IPS (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 312.13 ± 1.75 | 262.81 ± 2.60 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 367.10 ± 12.19 | 310.12 ± 11.26 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 377.15 ± 12.19 | 334.21 ± 12.29 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 598.41 ± 22.10 | 378.12 ± 24.10 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 564.68 ± 13.19 | 401.56 ± 12.19 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 648.69 ± 9.18 | 421.60 ± 6.77 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 238.15 ± 42.17 | 188.10 ± 12.27 |
| 8 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 364.15 ± 3.79 | 250.10 ± 2.70 |
| 9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 209.16 ± 28.11 | 166.16 ± 15.7 |
| K1 | 10.16 | 9.18 | 14.84 | 14.65 | ||
| K2 | 22.11 | 13.91 | 13.78 | 14.98 | ||
| K3 | 11.15 | 9.02 | 14.06 | 14.39 | ||
| R | 12.10 | 4.15 | 0.82 | 2.19 | ||
| K1* | 452.16 | 343.80 | 422.13 | 317.46 | ||
| K2* | 572.19 | 516.12 | 542.14 | 378.16 | ||
| K3* | 312.18 | 318.10 | 362.18 | 412.21 | ||
| R* | 382.11 | 82.18 | 23.18 | 97.75 |
K1 = Σ EPS at culture factor level1/3., K1* = Σ IPS yield at culture factor level1/3
EC50 value of EPS and IPS
| Antioxidant assays | EC50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPS (mg/mL) | IPS (mg/mL) | Ascorbic Acid | EDTA | |
| DPPH radical scavenging activity | 7 | 6 | 24.42 ± 2.15 | - |
| ABTS radical scavenging activity | 6 | 5 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | - |
| Reducing power | 6 | 5 | 0. 29 ± 0.01 | - |
| Iron chelating activity | 1 | 1 | - | 0.06 ± 0.0 |
Different letters represent the significant difference in each column and row (p ≤ 0.05)
Antibacterial activity of EPS and IPS from C. cicadae
| Bacterial Strains | Inhibition Zone EPS (mm) | Inhibition Zone IPS (mm) | Positive control (tetra cycline) | Negative Control (EDTA)- | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 % (con.) | 50 % (con.) | 75 % (con.) | 100 % (con.) | 25 % (con.) | 50 % (con.) | 75 % (con.) | 100 % (con.) | |||
|
| 7.1 ± 0.5 | 9.2 ± 0.3 | 10.2 ± 0.4 | 11.1 ± 02 | 8.0 ± 0.2 | 10.8 ± 0.2 | 11.8 ± 0.9 | 11.9 ± 0.1 | 21 ± 1.52 | - |
|
| - | - | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 9.3 ± 0.6 | - | - | 8.9 ± 0.3 | 10.8 ± 0.3 | 23 ± 2.35 | - |
|
| - | 7.2 ± 0.2 | 9.3 ± 02 | 10.5 ± 0.8 | - | 7.8 ± 0.7 | 9.9 ± 0.2 | 10.9 ± 0.6 | 19 ± 1.50 | - |
|
| 8.2 ± 0.3 | 9.4 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.7 | 12.5 ± 0.3 | 8.6 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 11.5 ± 0.6 | 12.9 ± 0.2 | 18 ± 1.21 | - |
|
| - | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 10.5 ± 0.2 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | - | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | 11.2 ± 0.7 | 18 ± 2.15 | - |
|
| - | - | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 10.1 ± 0.2 | - | - | 9.5 ± 0.8 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | 15 ± 2.33 | - |
|
| 7.3 ± 0.6 | 9.2 ± 0.4 | 10.4 ± 0.5 | 11.1 ± 0.9 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 11.5 ± 0.8 | 16 ± 1.92 | - |
|
| - | - | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 9.2 ± 0.5 | - | - | 8.2 ± 0.1 | 9.9 ± 0.9 | 15 ± 1.88 | - |
con. – concentration, p values < 0.05
MIC of polysaccharides extracts against tested microorganism
| Species | EPS extract (mg/mL) | IPS extract (mg/mL) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 80 | 60 | 40 | 20 | 100 | 80 | 60 | 40 | 20 | |
|
| ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
|
| + | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ |
|
| + | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | - | + | + | ++ | +++ |
|
| - | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | - | + | ++ | ++ | +++ |
|
| - | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | - | + | ++ | ++ | +++ |
|
| - | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | - | + | ++ | ++ | +++ |
|
| * | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
|
| + | + | ++ | ++ | +++ | + | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ |
*MIC concentration; − No growth; + Cloudy solution (slight growth); ++ Turbid solution (strong growth); +++ Highly turbid solution (dense growth)