| Literature DB >> 26998481 |
Xiujun Gao1, Peisheng Yan1, Xin Liu2, Jianbing Wang1, Jiajia Yu1.
Abstract
To optimize the production conditions for exopolysaccharides with higher antioxidant activities from Xerocomus badius cultured in shrimp byproduct medium, Plackett-Burman design, path of steepest ascent, and response surface methodology were explored. Based on the results of Plackett-Burman design and path of steepest ascent, a Box-Behnken design was applied to optimization and the regression models. The optimal cultural condition for high yield and antioxidant activity of the exopolysaccharides was determined to be 10.347% of solid-to-liquid ratio, a 4.322% content of bran powder, and a 1.217% concentration of glacial acetic acid. Culturing with the optimal cultural conditions resulted in an exopolysaccharides yield of 4.588 ± 0.346 g/L and a total antioxidant activity of 2.956 ± 0.105 U/mg. These values are consistent with the values predicted by the corresponding regression models (RSD < 5%).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26998481 PMCID: PMC4779826 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2043787
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Plackett-Burman experimental design matrix for screening the cultural medium and conditions with mycelium biomass and yield of crude EPS as response.
| Runs | Experimental factors | Yields of EPS (g/L) | T-AO activity (U/mg) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 1 (10.0) | −1 (5.0) | 1 | −1 (100) | 1 (10.0) | 1 | −1 (120) | −1 (1.30) | −1 | 1 (30) | 1 (96) | 3.634 ± 0.124 | 2.146 ± 0.130 |
| 2 | 1 (10.0) | −1 (5.0) | 1 | −1 (100) | −1 (8.0) | −1 | 1 (150) | 1 (1.63) | 1 | 1 (30) | −1 (72) | 1.956 ± 0.171 | 1.371 ± 0.098 |
| 3 | −1 (8.0) | 1 (6.5) | −1 | −1 (100) | −1 (8.0) | 1 | 1 (150) | −1 (1.30) | 1 | 1 (30) | 1 (96) | 1.724 ± 0.163 | 0.864 ± 0.074 |
| 4 | −1 (8.0) | −1 (5.0) | 1 | 1 (125) | 1 (10.0) | −1 | 1 (150) | −1 (1.30) | 1 | −1 (25) | 1 (96) | 2.135 ± 0.174 | 1.776 ± 0.106 |
| 5 | 1 (10.0) | −1 (5.0) | −1 | 1 (125) | −1 (8.0) | 1 | −1 (120) | 1 (1.63) | 1 | −1 (25) | 1 (96) | 1.481 ± 0.133 | 1.542 ± 0.095 |
| 6 | −1 (8.0) | −1 (5.0) | −1 | 1 (125) | 1 (10.0) | 1 | 1 (150) | 1 (1.63) | −1 | 1 (30) | −1 (72) | 1.519 ± 0.147 | 1.557 ± 0.107 |
| 7 | 1 (10.0) | 1 (6.5) | −1 | −1 (100) | 1 (10.0) | −1 | 1 (150) | 1 (1.63) | −1 | −1 (25) | 1 (96) | 0.935 ± 0.131 | 0.785 ± 0.034 |
| 8 | 1 (10.0) | 1 (6.5) | −1 | 1 (125) | 1 (10.0) | −1 | −1 (120) | −1 (1.3) | 1 | 1 (30) | −1 (72) | 2.493 ± 0.195 | 2.217 ± 0.112 |
| 9 | −1 (8.0) | −1 (5.0) | −1 | −1 (100) | −1 (8.0) | −1 | −1 (120) | −1 (1.30) | −1 | −1 (25) | −1 (72) | 2.061 ± 0.144 | 1.563 ± 0.083 |
| 10 | 1 (10.0) | 1 (6.5) | 1 | 1 (125) | −1 (8.0) | 1 | 1 (150) | −1 (1.30) | −1 | −1 (25) | −1 (72) | 1.664 ± 0.209 | 1.782 ± 0.091 |
| 11 | −1 (8.0) | 1 (6.5) | 1 | −1 (100) | 1 (10.0) | 1 | −1 (120) | 1 (1.63) | 1 | −1 (25) | −1 (72) | 0.091 ± 0.010 | 0.637 ± 0.047 |
| 12 | −1 (8.0) | 1 (6.5) | 1 | 1 (125) | −1 (8.0) | −1 | −1 (120) | 1 (1.63) | −1 | 1 (30) | 1 (96) | 0.704 ± 0.017 | 0.345 ± 0.022 |
Notes: X 1, solid-to-liquid ratio (%, m/v); X 2, bran powder content (%); X 3, volume of liquid medium (mL); X 4, inoculation amount of mycelium (%); X 5, rotation rate (rpm); X 6, concentration of glacial acetic acid (%); X 7, cultural temperature (°C); X 8, cultivation time (h); A, B, and C refer to dummy columns.
Experimental trials in the path of steepest ascent (descent).
| Trials | Experimental factors | Yields of EPS (g/L) | T-AO activity (U/mg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 9.00 | 5.80 | 1.46 | 0.19 ± 0.022 | 0.337 ± 0.027 |
| 2 | 9.50 | 5.40 | 1.36 | 1.418 ± 0.015 | 1.365 ± 0.102 |
| 3 | 10.00 | 5.00 | 1.26 | 3.548 ± 0.269 | 2.154 ± 0.114 |
| 4 | 10.50 | 4.60 | 1.16 | 4.346 ± 0.124 | 2.779 ± 0.138 |
| 5 | 11.00 | 4.20 | 1.06 | 3.351 ± 0.169 | 2.787 ± 0.171 |
| 6 | 11.50 | 3.80 | 0.96 | 3.015 ± 0.184 | 1.228 ± 0.103 |
| 7 | 12.00 | 3.40 | 0.86 | 1.644 ± 0.093 | 1.162 ± 0.087 |
| 8 | 12.50 | 3.00 | 0.76 | 0.136 ± 0.055 | 0.649 ± 0.046 |
Box-Behnken designs of different factors with their responses.
| Trials | Experimental factors | Yields of EPS (g/L) | T-AO activity (U/mg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | 0 (10.5) | 1 (5.4) | 1 (1.36) | 2.547 ± 0.077 | 1.296 ± 0.326 |
| 2 | 1 (11.5) | −1 (3.8) | 0 (1.16) | 1.909 ± 0.108 | 2.068 ± 0.083 |
| 3 | 0 (10.5) | 0 (4.6) | 0 (1.16) | 4.412 ± 0.173 | 3.072 ± 0.860 |
| 4 | 0 (10.5) | −1 (3.8) | 1 (1.36) | 4.088 ± 0.156 | 2.633 ± 0.122 |
| 5 | 0 (10.5) | 0 (4.6) | 0 (1.16) | 4.522 ± 0.151 | 2.929 ± 0.096 |
| 6 | 0 (10.5) | −1 (3.8) | −1 (0.96) | 3.366 ± 0.231 | 1.674 ± 0.078 |
| 7 | −1 (9.5) | 0 (4.6) | 1 (1.36) | 3.515 ± 0.095 | 2.092 ± 0.113 |
| 8 | 0 (10.5) | 0 (4.6) | 0 (1.16) | 4.483 ± 0.07 | 3.184 ± 0.105 |
| 9 | 1 (11.5) | 0 (4.6) | 1 (1.36) | 2.634 ± 0.229 | 1.676 ± 0.098 |
| 10 | 1 (11.5) | 0 (4.6) | −1 (0.96) | 2.384 ± 0.072 | 1.534 ± 0.128 |
| 11 | 1 (11.5) | 1 (5.4) | 0 (1.16) | 1.023 ± 0.094 | 1.251 ± 0.086 |
| 12 | 0 (10.5) | 0 (4.6) | 0 (1.16) | 4.588 ± 0.186 | 2.879 ± 0.104 |
| 13 | 0 (10.5) | 0 (4.6) | 0 (1.16) | 4.496 ± 0.108 | 2.602 ± 0.094 |
| 14 | −1 (9.5) | 1 (5.4) | 0 (1.16) | 2.025 ± 0.104 | 1.838 ± 0.083 |
| 15 | −1 (9.5) | 0 (4.6) | −1 (0.96) | 3.288 ± 0.144 | 1.429 ± 0.114 |
| 16 | 0 (10.5) | 1 (5.4) | −1 (0.96) | 2.900 ± 0.117 | 1.909 ± 0.077 |
| 17 | −1 (9.5) | −1 (3.8) | 0 (1.16) | 3.109 ± 0.139 | 2.303 ± 0.080 |
ANOVA analysis for the Plackett-Burman factorial model of yield and T-AO activity of crude EPS.
| Source | Yield of crude EPS (g/L) | T-AO activity (U/mg) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
| Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
| |
| Model | 8.966 | 8 | 1.121 | 92.357 | 0.0017 | 3.899 | 8 | 0.487 | 35.366 | 0.0069 |
|
| 4.111 | 1 | 4.111 | 338.816 | 0.0003 | 1.408 | 1 | 1.408 | 102.194 | 0.0021 |
|
| 0.014 | 1 | 0.014 | 1.132 | 0.3654 | 0.286 | 1 | 0.286 | 20.763 | 0.0198 |
|
| 0.123 | 1 | 0.123 | 10.155 | 0.0498 | 0.227 | 1 | 0.227 | 16.483 | 0.0269 |
|
| 2.231 | 1 | 2.231 | 183.843 | 0.0009 | 0.921 | 1 | 0.921 | 66.852 | 0.0038 |
|
| 0.057 | 1 | 0.057 | 4.708 | 0.1185 | 0.232 | 1 | 0.232 | 16.844 | 0.0262 |
|
| 0.024 | 1 | 0.024 | 1.944 | 0.2576 | 0.008 | 1 | 0.008 | 0.600 | 0.4950 |
|
| 1.287 | 1 | 1.287 | 106.067 | 0.0020 | 0.801 | 1 | 0.801 | 58.148 | 0.0047 |
|
| 1.119 | 1 | 1.119 | 92.195 | 0.0024 | 0.014 | 1 | 0.014 | 1.041 | 0.3826 |
| Residual | 0.036 | 3 | 0.012 | 0.041 | 3 | 0.014 | ||||
| Cor total | 9.002 | 11 | 3.940 | 11 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
Figure 1Pareto plot for Plackett-Burman parameter estimates for 8 factors.
ANOVA analysis for quadratic regression model of the yield and T-AO activity of crude EPS in BBD.
| Source | Yield of crude EPS (g/L) | T-AOA (U/mg) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
| Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
| |
| Model | 18.603 | 9 | 2.067 | 364.998 | <0.0001 | 6.312 | 9 | 0.701 | 19.041 | 0.0004 |
|
| 1.987 | 1 | 1.987 | 350.869 | <0.0001 | 0.160 | 1 | 0.160 | 4.356 | 0.0753 |
|
| 0.089 | 1 | 0.089 | 15.798 | 0.0054 | 0.166 | 1 | 0.166 | 4.496 | 0.0717 |
|
| 1.977 | 1 | 1.977 | 349.111 | <0.0001 | 0.710 | 1 | 0.710 | 19.287 | 0.0032 |
|
| 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.023 | 0.8829 | 0.068 | 1 | 0.068 | 1.842 | 0.2168 |
|
| 0.010 | 1 | 0.010 | 1.731 | 0.2298 | 0.031 | 1 | 0.031 | 0.841 | 0.3896 |
|
| 0.289 | 1 | 0.289 | 51.015 | 0.0002 | 0.618 | 1 | 0.618 | 16.772 | 0.0046 |
|
| 7.982 | 1 | 7.982 | 1409.456 | <0.0001 | 1.680 | 1 | 1.680 | 45.618 | 0.0003 |
|
| 0.119 | 1 | 0.119 | 21.009 | 0.0025 | 1.612 | 1 | 1.612 | 43.760 | 0.0003 |
|
| 5.158 | 1 | 5.158 | 910.869 | <0.0001 | 0.802 | 1 | 0.802 | 21.778 | 0.0023 |
| Residual | 0.040 | 7 | 0.006 | 0.258 | 7 | 0.037 | ||||
| Lack of fit | 0.023 | 3 | 0.008 | 1.914 | 0.2688 | 0.063 | 3 | 0.021 | 0.431 | 0.7422 |
| Pure error | 0.016 | 4 | 0.004 | 0.195 | 4 | 0.049 | ||||
| Cor total | 18.643 | 16 | 6.570 | 16 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
Figure 2Response surface plots of the yield of crude EPS. (a) Interaction of the solid-to-liquid ratio and bran powder content; (b) interaction of the solid-to-liquid ratio and the concentration of glacial acetic acid; (c) interaction of the bran powder content and the concentration of glacial acetic acid.
Figure 3Response surface plots of the T-OA activity of crude EPS. (a) Interaction of the solid-to-liquid ratio and the bran powder content; (b) interaction of the solid-to-liquid ratio and the concentration of glacial acetic acid; (c) interaction of the bran powder content and the concentration of glacial acetic acid.