Literature DB >> 25877209

MyHip: supporting planning and surgical guidance for a better total hip arthroplasty : A pilot study.

Jérôme Schmid1, Christophe Chênes2, Sylvain Chagué3, Pierre Hoffmeyer4, Panayiotis Christofilopoulos4, Massimiliano Bernardoni5, Caecilia Charbonnier3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) aims to restore patient mobility by providing a pain-free and stable artificial joint. A successful THA depends on the planning and its execution during surgery. Both tasks rely on the experience of the surgeon to understand the complex biomechanical behavior of the hip. We investigate the hypothesis that a computer-assisted solution for THA effectively supports the preparation and execution of the planning.
METHODS: We devised MyHip as a computer-assisted framework for THA. The framework provides pre-operative planning based on medical imaging and optical motion capture to optimally select and position the implant. The planning considers the morphology and range of motion of the patient's hip to reduce the risk of impingements and joint instability. The framework also provides intra-operative support based on patient-specific surgical guides. We performed a post-operative analysis on three patients who underwent THA. Based on post-operative radiological images, we reconstructed a patient-specific model of the prosthetic hip to compare planned and effective positioning of the implants.
RESULTS: When the guides were used, we measured non-significant variations of planned executions such as bone cutting. Moreover, patients' hip motions were acquired and used in a dynamic simulation of the prosthetic hip. Conflicts prone to implant failure, such as impingements or subluxations, were not detected.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that MyHip provides a promising computer assistance for THA. The results of the dynamic simulation highlighted the quality of the surgery and especially of its planning. The planning was properly executed since non-significant variations were detected during the radiological analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guiding blocks; Impingements and joint instability; Joint kinematics; Medical imaging; Pre-operative planning; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25877209     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1177-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  50 in total

1.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation.

Authors:  Mark E Nadzadi; Douglas R Pedersen; H John Yack; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  William J Maloney; James A Keeney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Effects of CT image segmentation methods on the accuracy of long bone 3D reconstructions.

Authors:  Kanchana Rathnayaka; Tony Sahama; Michael A Schuetz; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation.

Authors:  Richard L Wixson; Margot A MacDonald
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Activity-dependence of the "safe zone" for impingement versus dislocation avoidance.

Authors:  D R Pedersen; J J Callaghan; T D Brown
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate.

Authors:  Burkhard Lembeck; Otto Mueller; Patrik Reize; Nikolaus Wuelker
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Computer-assisted versus manual alignment in THA: a probabilistic approach to range of motion.

Authors:  Anthony J Petrella; Joshua Q Stowe; Darryl D D'Lima; Paul J Rullkoetter; Peter J Laz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Cup size and risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robin Peter; Anne Lübbeke; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  2 in total

1.  ArthroPlanner: a surgical planning solution for acromioplasty.

Authors:  Caecilia Charbonnier; Sylvain Chagué; Bart Kevelham; Delphine Preissmann; Frank C Kolo; Olivier Rime; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Bone-to-Bone and Implant-to-Bone Impingement: A Novel Graphical Representation for Hip Replacement Planning.

Authors:  Arnab Palit; Richard King; Zoe Hart; Yolanda Gu; James Pierrepont; Mark T Elliott; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.