Literature DB >> 15190563

Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty.

William J Maloney1, James A Keeney.   

Abstract

Restoration of hip biomechanics, including femoral offset and leg length are desired goals in performing total hip arthroplasty. Minor leg length discrepancies, less than a centimeter, are common after total hip arthroplasty and usually well tolerated. However in some patients, even these small discrepancies are a source of dissatisfaction. In addition, more significant discrepancies can be a risk factor for nerve injury and are a relatively common cause of litigation. Although leg length discrepancy cannot be eliminated after hip arthroplasty, it can be minimized through a series of steps both preoperatively and intraoperatively. These include physical examination to determine true and apparent leg length, and radiographic evaluation to both assess leg length and to preoperatively template the surgical procedure. Finally, the preoperative plan needs to be executed in the operating room using appropriate intraoperative cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15190563     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  46 in total

1.  Influence of self-reported limb length discrepancy on function and satisfaction 6 years after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Maura D Iversen; Nidhi Chudasama; Elena Losina; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

2.  A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael J Archibeck; Tamara Cummins; Joshua Carothers; Daniel W Junick; Richard E White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  MyHip: supporting planning and surgical guidance for a better total hip arthroplasty : A pilot study.

Authors:  Jérôme Schmid; Christophe Chênes; Sylvain Chagué; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos; Massimiliano Bernardoni; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Ahmad Malik; Johan Witt; Fares Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: a review of literature.

Authors:  Aravind S Desai; Asterios Dramis; Tim N Board
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

6.  What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Matthew T Jennings; Arlen D Hanssen; Mark W Pagnano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Femoral shortening during hip arthroplasty through a modified lateral approach.

Authors:  Domagoj Delimar; Goran Bicanic; Kresimir Korzinek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A novel non-invasive mechanical technique of cup and stem placement and leg length adjustment in total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hips.

Authors:  Takashi Murayama; Hideo Ohnishi; Toshiharu Mori; Yuichi Okazaki; Kenji Sujita; Akinori Sakai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or less: do we improve activity profiles?

Authors:  Margaret Kuhn; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Karen Steger-May; Gail Pashos; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Basic science considerations in primary total hip replacement arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saqeb B Mirza; Douglas G Dunlop; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Syed G Naqvi; Shafat Gangoo; Saif Salih
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.